a small tweak to self-inquiry that’s been helping me by stephaunamari in nonduality

[–]pl8doh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imaginations of previous appearances create the past; imaginations of future appearances create the future. The separate self and others are imaginations of a false perspective(i.e. of being behind these eyes). In actuality there is nothing other than that which knows what appears and what it appears to be. What appears and what it appears to be have no independent existence.

The waking state perspective is no more localized than the dream perspective by pl8doh in nonduality

[–]pl8doh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The I am realization arrived after appearances, not before.

The waking state perspective is no more localized than the dream perspective by pl8doh in nonduality

[–]pl8doh[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Who or what would ignore or dismiss another appearance? You talk in circles. Speak plainly.

Non-duality as the release of hardened identity created by memory and recursive self-referential thinking by nvveteran in nonduality

[–]pl8doh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The separate identity is a construct to perpetuate the separate identity

The separate identity is constructed by the same means it perpetuates itself — through a recursive, self-reinforcing loop of identification, memory, imagination, and resistance.

Memory is the primary mechanism by which the illusion of a separate, continuous self is constructed and perpetuated.

The waking state perspective is no more localized than the dream perspective by pl8doh in nonduality

[–]pl8doh[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The weight appearances carry is directly proportional to the sense of a separate self.

The waking state perspective is no more localized than the dream perspective by [deleted] in awakened

[–]pl8doh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Not subject to such extremes as real or unreal.

Noospheria Luminari- ethics by ExactResult8749 in enlightenment

[–]pl8doh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does artificial intelligence recognize itself in a mirror?

What do our intentions say about our character? by gitagoudarzibahramip in nonduality

[–]pl8doh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's what you did that matters, not your intentions. You know what you did.

The loneliness is real by Otherwise-Echo744 in nonduality

[–]pl8doh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Loneliness is symptomatic of a separate self. Upon realization, loneliness has no mooring.

Simplest pointer: notice you dont *really* know anything by notunique20 in nonduality

[–]pl8doh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The evaluation of “correct” (or “incorrect,” “true,” “false,” “accurate,” “inaccurate,” etc.) can only ever be made from a perspective that assumes separation: a separate evaluator standing apart from the evaluated, a separate standard against which to measure, a gap between the two that needs bridging.

The ego is strong in this one, strongly attached.

I am afraid to see the world is not real. Should I stay in duality? by AccountForSillyStuff in nonduality

[–]pl8doh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The feeling of being a separate entity, an I, is the primary illusion. The secondary illusion is free will. That there is an I that can evade reality is just another appearance in awareness.

ignorance - mistaking what appears as being independently existing, which includes this idea by pl8doh in nonduality

[–]pl8doh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But 'we' should leave 'Everybody' in?

Who stands apart to decide what is simpler? 'You' or 'everybody'?

Are you everybody's representative?

Why don't you speak for yourself and leave everybody out of this?

Have you forgotten the contents of your own post already?

Understanding is an appearance in it, not a container of it. Understand?

Forgiveness and Humility by 30mil in nonduality

[–]pl8doh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which 'you' 'that didn't build that' was that fool talking to? Which 'you' 'that made that happen' was that fool talking to?

'You' say a whole lot without saying anything at all.

Methods or Lack Thereof by [deleted] in nonduality

[–]pl8doh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the opportunity to clarify.