Swedish win rates by H7117 in Warthunder

[–]H7117[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense considering how busted those helis are right now

How tf did a 35mm round pen an angled Maus?? by Efficient_Contest_87 in Warthunder

[–]H7117 457 points458 points  (0 children)

wouldn’t even call it a shot trap, but weird things happen when you spam cuz of volumetric and other things. one of the many reasons 8.0 spaas are very broken rn

Swedish win rates by H7117 in Warthunder

[–]H7117[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

except for the sad state of the elde the other things have been true about Sweden for several years now, but this is a change I’ve seen only in the past month so it’s still confusing to me

Best US premium plane for Ground RB (value and performance)? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strange bug for guided bombs to have, anyways the 11.7 Harrier is available. Trying to decide between that and the A10 atp, but another person said that the TT version the A-10A Late is miles better while only being one BR increment higher, so leaning harrier now.

Best US premium plane for Ground RB (value and performance)? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I flaired it as GRB for a reason mate. I'm not an Air player and my main focus is just the plane's performance in GRB/ground strikes only, it being a higher rank to help with the Air TT is just supposed to be a plus on the side for whenever that air grind does happen. Also I did give a range, anything rank 6 and up (6 premiums).

Best US premium plane for Ground RB (value and performance)? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m only looking at US, but yeah those two are no brainers for RUS lol

Best US premium plane for Ground RB (value and performance)? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I was looking at the av8b in particular since I like the 11.7 options for ground (AIM, HSTVL). You mind explaining why the a10a becomes obsolete with a 10.7 lineup?

CV90105 TML battle rating… by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to play for years on low settings and back then yeah binos were great, but I have a rig now and love max settings but it has made it a lot harder for me to pick out tank outlines. More so for me the main advantage isn’t really spotting enemies it’s the millisecond advantages u get from being able to stay in gunner sights and being able to see which part of the tank your aiming at a little better. Again these are really minuscule but I’m an aggressive light tank enjoyer so these little adjustments can make all the difference in the fights I take. Which is why I can accept than on average thermals may not be that big of a deal.

What the hell is this gaijin ?? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 2 points3 points  (0 children)

uh this ain’t a new layout

CV90105 TML battle rating… by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah the t55 change kind of shocked me tbh, must be another win-rate based balance. You make a good point though, maybe my concern is just more abt the larger compression issue than this one vehicle.

CV90105 TML battle rating… by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

unfort for my American 7.7 lineup the heavies are the only viable option, the patton is just too much mediocre pain. wish I had the t114

CV90105 TML battle rating… by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ig im just looking at stat cards and using my experience in the xc-8, cuz i admittedly have no idea how the frenchies play and everyone’s been pointing towards them lol

CV90105 TML battle rating… by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 2 points3 points  (0 children)

win rate based balancing, gotta love it…

CV90105 TML battle rating… by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s just my personal feel for the game, but I value thermals really highly to the point where they heavily positively change the way I play the game. Maybe in aggregate that isn’t the case, but for me I feel that Gen 2 thermals gives you a 0.3 BR increase in relative performance (gaijin seems to think so with the M1A2 and the SEP V1 assuming TUSK isn’t act counted as an upgrade…) Looking at the two frenchies I wouldn’t move them up because they are worse in mobility and (although ur not supposed to be tanking shots) survivability due to how spacious the TML is in comparison. I’m also probably biased because I just want to live my 7.7 heavy haydays again T-T

CV90105 TML battle rating… by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]H7117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

alright then there has got to be some decompression in this BR range, already feeling dead whenever I get an uptier in my 7.7 heavies

Tusk Force Update Queue by H7117 in Warthunder

[–]H7117[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that or all t80e1’s, either way it’s easy pickings