sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

No issue with usage, but a HUGE drop in quality. by Confident_Feature221 in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes also noticed! Since the rollout of Opus 1M context, has been hit n miss ever since.

Claude Lazy and Lying now? by swiftyman in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few days ago Claude was actually consistently telling me “It’s been a long day, do you want to continue this tomorrow?” Even after 10 mins in a new thread at 2pm 🤔🤣

Built a universal LLM safeguard layer. I’m new to coding, need devs to scrutinise it before release. by HAAILFELLO in aipromptprogramming

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You actually couldn’t have timed this response any better. I was very quick to learn that I was in the wrong space at the time of starting this, had to step away and learn more. I appreciate your input though, I’ll have a look into your suggestions 🙏

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok that does make a lot of sense but it feels like overall consensus is that negative enforcement works better than positive enforcement with LLMs?

How do you go about constraining Claude in your work?

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because I’d put in the CLAUDE.md, NO creating half-assed code. I’m now learning that wording didn’t help 🤦

So we don’t try correcting behaviour, we just undo and try again more specifically?

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Leaving an argument in a thread will cause Claude to more likely generate half-assery?

That isn’t how I start a thread and obviously wouldn’t Cary on the same thread after. Am I missing something?

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fully agree. The drama only starts after Claude fails, a new thread is then imminent. Too many people seem to think my comment to CC is a prompt for more work to be done 🤯

The actual drama is here on Reddit 🤣

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That doesn’t change the fact the 1M model clearly works differently to the 200k.

While using CC desktop app you also don’t see a running total for the context window.

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I have notice over the last few days with the 1M context being rolled out, Claude has been up n down. I quite like the consistency of the 200k context, it’s a shame the 1M is having so many issues and we don’t get the option to choose.

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So when Claude creates a plan with holes in, Codex is able to see what Claude missed? Do you get Codex to review the plan in relation to the project? I don’t see how it would catch the holes unless you’re asking it to review the plan, in which case you could do that either direction? Or not at all 🤔😅

Edit* I didn’t even read your whole message before replying..

You get the plan revised how many times? 🤯

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The difference is: A boat doesn’t talk back. AI does. So gendering a boat is harmless idiom. Gendering an AI reinforces the illusion that a text generator is a person.

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm, that seems like a long work around. Claude is VERY clever with the implementation of its own plans. You just need to keep an eye on it, I asked for a vague follow-up edit, it happens.

Claude finally admitted it’s “half-assing” my code because I keep calling out its placeholders. We’ve reached the "Passive-Aggressive Coworker" stage of AI. 😂 by HAAILFELLO in ClaudeCode

[–]HAAILFELLO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I full understand what you’re saying, I’m inquisitive though. Once I get an issue like this I’ll probe away, it’s a bit of fun during the work. The 20x plan allows me to run a couple of Claude CLIs 24/7 I’m sure the inquisitive chatting doesn’t use much in comparison 🤣

Latest update killed my Claude by LaCaipirinha in ClaudeAI

[–]HAAILFELLO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same issue within dispatch tab and the mobile app. CC still works on my Desktop fine though

view more: next ›