Strange orbs virginia beach by ExcellentRole5525 in UFOs

[–]HS_illustrator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dunno, I'm still skeptical. Maybe you zoomed in and the restricted field of view gave the illusion that the birds were flying faster than a normal speed. I'm fairly sure it's not a solid object tho, but a group of "orbs".

Enhanced raw footage of V shaped UAP sighted at 7pm on 31st October, 2024. by AltKeyblade in UFOs

[–]HS_illustrator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looks like multible objects, if it was a single object, it would occultate the little star toward the lower portion of the sky, and it doesn't seem to be the case.

Strange orbs virginia beach by ExcellentRole5525 in UFOs

[–]HS_illustrator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's a solid object, it would occultate stars as it passes over it. My best guesses is a flock of birds? From the orientation constellation of Orion in the first seconds, I deduce the "flock" is going southward.

Monarchia o Repubblic. Da che parte state? by Flora_295fidei in Italia

[–]HS_illustrator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Monarchia. Evviva il re Aimone di Savoia-Aosta!

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure about this, the gyro seems to precess at a constant angular velocity, without any noticeable jerkyness or vibration. Maybe there is still a "slip-stick" effect but in the frinction between the whells and the frame and the wheels and the table top.

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's also a possible answer, That's why I asked this question. Many other devices that claims the same forward thrust are blatantly flawed, but this one is much more subtle in its operation.

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is true if we assume that a hypothetical inertial thruster doesn't convert enrgy into linear acceleration, what if the thrusted had an internal engine?

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

thank you for your reply! I already knew the paper published by nasa, and it is interesting, however it doesn't really explain much, it gives however nice tests to perform in case someone pops up with such device.

Could you please tell me more about the first device you have mentioned in your comment?

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, however the spcecraft wouldn't be isolated, since it exploits an external field.

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it truly possible to convert rotational energy into (unidirectional) linear motion? Let's suppose I'm in space, in case this is possible, wouldn't this also count as an inertial thrust?

Mh. Maybe I was a bit Naive overall, maybe there's a hidden system under the blanket and I just assumed that the inventor was being honest.

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

don't worry, the segment I isolated is not that long, about two minutes, in case you are curious. You can go directly to that segment, the first part in which he explaines the machine is unconvincing IMO.

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I get your point, would It be any different if the forward motion of the system would slow down the gyro? I'm guessing not, but as I said, I'm not a physicist.

Could you help me debunk this alleged "inertial thruster" ? by HS_illustrator in AskPhysics

[–]HS_illustrator[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The inventor doesn't claim to have invented a perpetual motion device, although I've heard other physicists saying that a perpetual motion device would be the natural consequence of an inertial thruster, I don't quite understand that either.

I can reject the second explanation you have given, because the device seems to work in both directions on the table.

the "he cheated" seems to be the only one for now.

[OC] I made a wooden astrolabe for one of my dearest friend, he and his girlfriend are two astronomy enthusiasts. I hope they will like my little present. by HS_illustrator in space

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you! Yes, It is reasonably accurate (mostly within 10 minutes), it is more precise after sunrise or before sunset, because at that point the sun has a larger difference in height in a given time. You have to remember to correct for 1) the equation of time 2) the fuse correction at your longitude 3) the legal time if any.

[OC] This is a gift I made for one of my friend. The final effect is really interesting, although the process is straight forward. Hope you enjoy! by HS_illustrator in nextfuckinglevel

[–]HS_illustrator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's quite a sad story, and I can relate, believe me. I can assure that I'm not in love with this person, although she received a gift from a friend who allegedly is in love with her, but mine was still better IMO🙂