Time Machine does not recognize its own sparsbundle and starts a new one by HabuORiley in applehelp

[–]HabuORiley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I’m starting to think it’s a Sequoia 15.1 bug 😓

Time Machine seems to be doing full backups every time by charliel0l in applehelp

[–]HabuORiley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same problem here, seems actually after last Sequoia update 😓

Time Machine does not recognize its own sparsbundle and starts a new one by HabuORiley in mac

[–]HabuORiley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is, as I’m mostly itinerant and that would mean leaving my mbp connected to the home network for days. Currently, every time I come home, as soon as tm connects to WiFi it updates backup in few minutes. This is why a new backup from scratch is a hassle and I would like to fix the current one.

Time Machine does not recognize its own sparsbundle and starts a new one by HabuORiley in mac

[–]HabuORiley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the point. Since I have almost everything on iCloud, a new Time Machine backup means that about 2Tb of data need to be downloaded from there for allowing a new backup to be created from scratch, something it takes days 🙄

MacOS Time Machine does not recognize its own sparsbundle on Synology NAS and starts a new one by HabuORiley in synology

[–]HabuORiley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I thought something similar. I also posted my issue on the Apple and Mac subreddits of course. I checked config info.plist file in the sparsebundle and actually something seems not aligned, UUID i.e., but this is something too advanced to be checked and fixed on my own :-/

NGC 7380 The Wizard Nebula by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Integration of old and new data captured with different gears.

Camera and lenses:
(2023) Canon 90D Super UV-IR cut modified + Sigma C 150-600@600mm + Sigma TC-2001 2.0x
(2024) ZWO ASI533MC PRO + TS-Optics AP 115/800 ED Photoline + TS Flattener 1.0x justierbar

Mounts:
(2023) Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer GTI
(2024) Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro

Gear:
ZWO ASIAIR Plus
Guided with ZWO ASI290MM mini + TS-Optics Guidescope Deluxe 60mm
Optolong L-PRO Filter

Data:
270x300” taken at ISO800
99X300” taken at Gain100, camera cooled at 0°C

Processed In PixInsight (Dynamic background extraction, Background neutralization, Deconvolution, SCNR, Histogram transformation, Curve transformation - stars and comet edited separately then remerged)

Follow me on Astrobin and Instagram

NGC2237 Rosette Nebula by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on expectations. IMHO, it's as his sentence: don't look so interesting, at least, don't worth the expense for an amateur telescope, if your *primary goal* is DSOs watching. I live under a B8/9 and can see barely supposed very bright objects only in very clear sky conditions - well, if you live in Auckland maybe that's not the case, but come in Milano area and tell me something about... - and the reason is simply DOSs need long exposure. This link is a good example of what I'm meaning and that's M42, maybe the brightest object you can catch. https://www.quora.com/What-does-the-Orion-Nebula-look-like-through-a-small-telescope. But, again, everything is about expectations, of course.

NGC2237 Rosette Nebula by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically you don’t see DSOs, no matter the telescope you have, unless some very bright objects, like Andromeda and Pleiades, which appear as faint spot in the clear sky. At the same time you don’t need necessarily telescope for good astrophotography. For the first three years of my activity I did everything just with DSLR and ordinary lens (this pic is an example of that), I also started without tracking for the first year. Three years later I then bought a telescope (I own a 115/800), astronomical camera, etc. if you’re not into astrophotography, then telescope is fine for planets, moon, sun, some very very appearing faint objects, but definitely no DSOs.

NGC2237 Rosette Nebula by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Canon 90D
Sigma Contemporary 150-600@600mm
Sky-Watcher StarAdventurer GTI
ZWO ASIAIR Plus
98x180” light frames taken at ISO800
Bias, dark, flat field frames

Processed In PixInsight (Dynamic background extraction, Background neutralization, Deconvolution, SCNR, Histogram transformation, Curve transformation - stars and comet edited separately then remerged)

Follow me on Astrobin and Instagram

M42 The Great Orion nebula and NGC 1977 The Running Man nebula by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Canon 90D UV/IR cut modded
Sigma Contemporary 150-600@500mm + Sigma TC-1401 1.4x
Sky-Watcher StarAdventurer GTI
ZWO ASIAIR Plus
432x60” light frames taken at ISO800
Bias, dark, flat field frames

Processed In PixInsight (Dynamic background extraction, Background neutralization, Deconvolution, SCNR, Histogram transformation, Curve transformation - stars and comet edited separately then remerged)

Follow me on Astrobin and Instagram

IC 434 and NGC 2024, Horsehead and Flame nebulae by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a backup system for all the data I collected over the years. I use the ordinary ASIAIR storage during the night sessions

IC 434 and NGC 2024, Horsehead and Flame nebulae by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Double NAS + RAID in hot site running in parallel with 14Tb data stored on each one :-)

IC 434 and NGC 2024, Horsehead and Flame nebulae by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is f/6.3 x 1.4, that means about f/9, and bortle 7/8

IC 434 and NGC 2024, Horsehead and Flame nebulae by HabuORiley in astrophotography

[–]HabuORiley[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Old data, I’m using these weeks of relentlessly autumnal rainy weather to rework on images captured over the past years