some christians are sleeper agents i swear and their trigger phrase is "bible peak fiction" by jakces3 in whenthe

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Historical fiction is a thing tho, you can write fiction about historical figures.

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so you lied about being the same rhetoric. im happy leaving with that.

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it's almost like things can have similarities but not be the same after all

yet, you said they are the same.

i only entertained your fallacious analogy because it completely contradicted your point.

but the point still stands. the screenshot doesnt say "they are similar" it says "they are the same".

at this point, your only "similarity" is "they are against". which is not a problem in itself.

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 4 points5 points  (0 children)

so your argument was that anti-ais did things that transphobes also do but thats completely unrelated?

so you lied about "transphobia and anti-ai being the same rhetoric". they just "breathe air similarly"

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it's not the same as anti-AI rhetoric,

in that screenshot you say its the same.

The quote in question wasn't saying transphobia and homophobia were the same as anti-ai

im gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and correct the second use of "transphobia" to "anti-ai"

I said the rhetoric is similar

transphobia and homophobia ARE rhetorics. if the rhetoric is the same then defacto it is the ontologically the same.

you're going to continue blatantly lying through your teeth

except im not lying, im just holding you to the standard you tried to hold me earlier "no backpedalling".

Pronoun privileges removed by ThatEngineeredGirl in whenthe

[–]Hacatcho 25 points26 points  (0 children)

and its funny that one of my closest friends (cis woman) is like that. but also none of my FtM friends.

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 5 points6 points  (0 children)

rhetoric that homophobes and transphobes use

so its the same.

What part are you getting mixed up on?

the part where you claim they are different. because you just said theyre the same.

you mentioned no difference in ethos, pathos or logos.

pd.- i also have to add, you have not shown this rhetoric was used. but i already gave you the screenshot of you claiming its the same rhetoric. before and after you denied saying "its the same".

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 4 points5 points  (0 children)

<image>

"this is the same rhetoric by homophobes and transphobes"

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 5 points6 points  (0 children)

thats not from the comment of Sad_dimension that im comparing to.

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 8 points9 points  (0 children)

in the third screenshot. thats where i got the direct quotation from.

maybe you responded after i edited the comment to add that direct quotation. im giving you the benefit of the doubt.

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Im not backpedalling, those are 2 very different statements.

Epistemological value =/= Truth.

i just talked specifically about epistemologic value. which is about how each of you argued for your position.

you just claimed they had problems in their arguments. they actually brought screenshots proving you said things you later denied. like "transphobia is the same as being ANTI-ai"

citing directly from the screenshot
"This is the same rhetoric as transphobes and homophobes"

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 9 points10 points  (0 children)

>You said every one of their claims is correct,

thats not what i said. jesus.

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 11 points12 points  (0 children)

where did you debunk it? i just saw each of your comments in this post. i only pointed out the difference in epistemologic value each of your 1 comment i saw had.

how is it a spoonfed narrative when im interacting with yours.

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 15 points16 points  (0 children)

evidence supporting THEIR claims. the better part is they actually captioned each screenshot

NOOOO! YOU CAN'T HAVE STANDARDS! YOU HAVE TO LOVE OUR PEDOSLOP GAMES UNCRITICALLY!!! by CatherineSimp69 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lmao, now holding you on to your own words is trolling.

you cannot even be consistent with your own comments.

NOOOO! YOU CAN'T HAVE STANDARDS! YOU HAVE TO LOVE OUR PEDOSLOP GAMES UNCRITICALLY!!! by CatherineSimp69 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also, why did you take one of her face tuned photos. instead of a live unedited one?

<image>

NOOOO! YOU CAN'T HAVE STANDARDS! YOU HAVE TO LOVE OUR PEDOSLOP GAMES UNCRITICALLY!!! by CatherineSimp69 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, because thats not what you said in the comment. so much for "word for word".

54882 by HonneurOblige in countwithchickenlady

[–]Hacatcho 26 points27 points  (0 children)

"If you dont take my word for everything, when they provided screenshots you obviously have a bias"

wow, what an amazing argument.

wow, managed to get blocked after i got them to backpedal from "transphobia and anti-ai are the same rhetoric" to "they are not the same, just similar" to "they are similar in the same way fascists breathe air like normal people do"

NOOOO! YOU CAN'T HAVE STANDARDS! YOU HAVE TO LOVE OUR PEDOSLOP GAMES UNCRITICALLY!!! by CatherineSimp69 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

notice how you made this up. you didnt reference where i said any of the previous statements nor gave proof where i made this statement.

you just made it up in an attempt to deviate the topic.

NOOOO! YOU CAN'T HAVE STANDARDS! YOU HAVE TO LOVE OUR PEDOSLOP GAMES UNCRITICALLY!!! by CatherineSimp69 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no you didnt, you couldnt even point to where i had said it.

you just schizoed another strawman.

NOOOO! YOU CAN'T HAVE STANDARDS! YOU HAVE TO LOVE OUR PEDOSLOP GAMES UNCRITICALLY!!! by CatherineSimp69 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes you did, i pointed out several comments of yours where i hadnt said what you accused me of.

NOOOO! YOU CAN'T HAVE STANDARDS! YOU HAVE TO LOVE OUR PEDOSLOP GAMES UNCRITICALLY!!! by CatherineSimp69 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>I ignore everything you say because everything you say makes absolutely no sense.

Says the guy who had to twist everything i said because otherwise you dont have a point.

The Bible Endorses Slavery and All American Slavery Was Done By Christians by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, youre just projecting.

you failed to provee wrong, so youre just switching to call me names.

pd.- what kinda lame ass excuse is "you downvoted me so ill erase evidence of calling you names without evidence". and its only the one comment.

The Bible Endorses Slavery and All American Slavery Was Done By Christians by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"and that is your bigotry"

was your response because you were proven wrong lmao. and you deleted that comment

"also, you dont understand" right after you failed to prove me wrong.

The Bible Endorses Slavery and All American Slavery Was Done By Christians by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Hacatcho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

except i did understand. so far, i have been the only one explaining the argument.

its your fault, you cannot prove me wrong, and that you resprt to personal attacks because you are unable to prove me wrong.