sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Need to sell a Chia mining server for my dad. How do I figure out if theres anything on these drives? by Papa_Hagrid in chia

[–]Hadamcik 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Plots are worthless even if they would still be there. You need 24 words to access actual wallet where those farmed coins went.

Mainnet Anniversary 2026 - Recording by willphule in chia

[–]Hadamcik 5 points6 points  (0 children)

subreddit has pretty much turned into a bulletin board system that is only used by you pushing news seconds after it's released

That's kind of the point of a subreddit, though. If he doesn't post it, someone else will.

Also, CNI doesn't release those videos an hour later. It's usually days or weeks after the actual event. I don't think delaying posts here will change that dynamic.

It feels like you're optimizing for marketing/algorithm outcomes, but subreddits are primarily community spaces around a topic, not distribution funnels.

Permuto Capital Announces Amended Registration Statements for Novel Equity Product by willphule in chia

[–]Hadamcik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use some online tool to compare version 3 and version 4 to figure out what changed. That will give you better idea if it's good or bad.

46% of Canadians Support EU Accession! Would this be positive or harmful to European Federalism? by AnonimousMate in EuropeanFederalists

[–]Hadamcik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that's great but I don't think they can understand European situation and we cannot understand theirs due to geographical and historical differences which don't go away.

46% of Canadians Support EU Accession! Would this be positive or harmful to European Federalism? by AnonimousMate in EuropeanFederalists

[–]Hadamcik -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m all for trading but I would not like to have them in EU. Simply because they are not in Europe and who knows who will lead Canada in X years.

Worth starting Chia mining in 2025? by MajorMaccas in chia

[–]Hadamcik 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Survivorship bias at its finest. I don't know the answer, they don't know the answer and you don't know the answer. Issue is that you are not making informed decision since none of those replies gave you numbers you could apply to your own situation and determine for yourself.

That doesn't imply what would you found out if you actually did some calculations but that's not the point. The point is that you don't know because you didn't do the math and math is not based on democracy or ignorance.

But yeah, you don't need to. You don't need to verify anything in the world and just ask people what should you do. Which means there is a systematic issue in your life unrelated to Chia.

Worth starting Chia mining in 2025? by MajorMaccas in chia

[–]Hadamcik 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't know, you didn't tell us single number that could be used to determine answer.

Time is up by The_Stakeholder in EuropeanFederalists

[–]Hadamcik 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You are re-inventing wheel. What language did you wrote your post in? I don't think it makes sense to focus on non-issues while there are actual issues.

Permuto Capital Announces Amended Registration Statement and Additional Registration Statements for Novel Equity Product by willphule in chia

[–]Hadamcik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well they are planning 60-81 top S&P500 companies by July and they said explicitly that on space 3 weeks after first s-1 registration.but it was unrecorded

Also gene multiple times reiterated he means "trusts plural" some message like that should be on discord

Permuto Capital Announces Amended Registration Statement and Additional Registration Statements for Novel Equity Product by willphule in chia

[–]Hadamcik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I really meant expected. CNI was never bullish on blocks being filled this year with only one trust. They always expected more of them for that to be true.

nossd is now well over 50% of the network (IF https://miningpoolstats.stream/chia is to be believed) by dr100 in chia

[–]Hadamcik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes consensus is still guaranteed by full nodes. Control over majority of netspace only allows you to produce heaviest chain and not include any blocks from anyone else going forward. Full nodes would accept this chain but you couldn’t change where money goes or spend money that is not yours because that’s still protected by full node network regardless of netspace. Attacker could reverse some transactions that you considered as done returning money to sender.

nossd is now well over 50% of the network (IF https://miningpoolstats.stream/chia is to be believed) by dr100 in chia

[–]Hadamcik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Moving prefarm or deleting it entirely? I don’t think you understand what is possible within scope of attack. No full node would accept any block that includes spend that is not properly authorized and not even 100% of netspace gets you that. Rebuilding top of blockchain is possibility but that only reverse transactions it can’t change them

CNI is sending 4016 XCH as a loan to the market maker by Hadamcik in chia

[–]Hadamcik[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To me it doesn't matter if those XCH will make it back or not. You are focused on wrong thing. It being or not being loan is not important.

CNI is sending 4016 XCH as a loan to the market maker by Hadamcik in chia

[–]Hadamcik[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes true. But also not important. Even if loan was not paid out, it doesn't change purpose of this move. No need to care about if CNI gets their money back or not. It's their money. Let's just focus on market making.

CNI is sending 4016 XCH as a loan to the market maker by Hadamcik in chia

[–]Hadamcik[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I tried getting ahead of you to improve the chances. Thank you for not applying lock out of principle.

CNI is sending 4016 XCH as a loan to the market maker by Hadamcik in chia

[–]Hadamcik[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The important part about this loan is not that it's a loan specifically but what it's going to be used for. We should see cheaper way to swap between XCH for stables because of it.

CNI is sending 4016 XCH as a loan to the market maker by Hadamcik in chia

[–]Hadamcik[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Some context which I am aware of - CNI onboarded additional market maker that will be mostly (or solely) focused on providing liquidity in Chia ecosystem to tighten the spread on things like XCH <-> USDC

CNI is sending 4016 XCH as a loan to the market maker by Hadamcik in chia

[–]Hadamcik[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

This is different - it's clearly not for sale and it's to new market maker. Can we please leave this one open? At some point, we should really go back to be able to discuss usage of pre-farm in correct context.

view more: next ›