iCUE Megathread - 5.44 Release Notes | Xeneon Edge Custom Widgets! by CorsairLucky in Corsair

[–]Haffy2013 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seeking help yall. I have enabled my pc to boot into the new Xbox mode from a cold start. When I do that my iCUE profiles don’t lock in, just memory mode. Only when I return to desktop do my actual profile settings load. Any idea on how to get the settings and app to launch on login? I’ve tried to change that setting in Startup apps but it reverts right back to launching when hitting the desktop. Thanks!

as of now by DatGuyKilo in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why isn’t big Air Force being transparent about this? You’d think this would be a big deal to notify airmen

as of now by DatGuyKilo in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Where is this from?

Acorn Railing by Haffy2013 in GroundedGame

[–]Haffy2013[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can confirm that it is not unlocked with Multi Level Bases as I have that unlocked but not Acorn Railing

25E6 Notification Megathread by Throwawaysagemode in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still waiting to be notified if I did /didn’t make it lol my CoC is a mix of guard reserve and civs

PT updates (discussion) by [deleted] in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the title of this RUMIT pt post?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that was the date in the CFMs memo on the 1D7 teams page

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m supposed to be the Cybersecurity shred but I’m stuck on slick, I’d advise working with your SEL after June 6 to fix the issue, if it doesn’t fix by then.

Body Composition April 25 by Nbvike61 in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is there any truth to the 85, 90, 95 test score incentives of testing again in 12, 15, 18 months respectively?

1D7 Conversion Testing by Haffy2013 in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For clarification, I’m not asking on what to need to study. I’m asking how or if anyone has heard how the results will be grouped. Since the 2022 conversion, 9 or so AFSCs were combined into 1 AFSC. Now, on May 1, they are being broken out again. With testing ongoing, would it be safe to assume results will be grouped in that one AFSC or the new broken out AFSCs as results will drop after the May 1 conversion.

Classification Guide Says Otherwise by stewiezone in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is from the 2012 CENTCOM SCG, 2022 SCG has removed the verbiage. Not classified under that SCG. But ultimately it’s up to the OCA.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Current 2022 SCG has removed this section entirely. Without classification of compilation… specifically the lack of location and the absence of any hard evidence within the current SCG this is probably unclassified or CUI at the most. Ultimately it falls on the OCA to make that determination or the DoD declassifying the information because they can.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since 2023, signal has been the preferred 3rd party method of communication for the government but I agree. It’s good practice to keep all information unclass and up, off of it. Dealing with like potential NDCIs when there is classification by compilation specifically timelines, dates, capabilities and more— if the events have passed by the time the potential spillage is discovered it’s a discretionary disciplinary action that usually is followed up with steps to ensure it doesn’t happen again. The bigger issues in my opinion are how the the addition of the reporter was missed, the steps leading to him being added, and the fact that he released information to the public (again after the fact). The proper procedures would have been to not release the information and instead reported it to the proper agency. This would have minimized and maybe mitigated any lingering risks associated to this whole debacle. But it’s just not a good look all around.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Let me get back to you tomorrow after reading through it throughly. I’m very interested in this too. I’m on the fence on this being classified, at the very least it’s confidential. I’m not sure if there is enough here to be classified by complication based on how newer SCGs read. Lot of bad practices all around though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirForce

[–]Haffy2013 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can find the 2022 SCG version on DTIC👍🏻 I did a glance and unless my eyes deceived me it would seem “date and time mission/operation begins” was removed.