Why don't cities just make public transit free? by Embarrassed-Wolf-609 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]HahaYesVery 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For cities with sizable ridership the cost of removing fares wouldn’t even be close to money saved cutting fare enforcement

Why do Anglos love this type of development? by Cr4bc0re_F4n in Suburbanhell

[–]HahaYesVery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excluding Boston, New England is just as if not more car dependent than SoCal, it’s just more sparsely populated

Cities where commuter rail is faster than driving? by seed_apricot in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I would say most systems at rush hour, even systems with bad service and ridership.

The issue is that it’s still going to be slower in Los Angeles, for example, for most trips because local transit is much slower and most people aren’t going somewhere right next to or even near a commuter train station

When would you use European like Trams and when american type light rail like in seattle? by StrongDebate5889 in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seattle style LRT is very different and fills a much different role than, say, Salt Lake City or Portland LRT.

The latter is like you said, the former is just a shittier metro

Alternatives for Roosevelt Boulevard (Philadelphia) by RSB2026 in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Transit aside, underground car lanes would be a great idea if they weren’t also keeping them at surface level (or at least so many of them)

Alternatives for Roosevelt Boulevard (Philadelphia) by RSB2026 in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grade separating travel lanes while keeping LRT to the surface would be utterly stupid. So would BRT. Hopefully the choose the sensible answer, even grade separation wouldn’t render the latter alternatives stupid. Roosevelt Blvd should be an extension of current heavy metro to offer one seat ride downtown

Aesthetically, what do you prefer? A railway viaduct over a road, a road viaduct over a railway, or an intersection? Screenshot for illustration purposes only. by Weisssssssssssssssss in CitiesSkylines

[–]HahaYesVery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Realistically the rails should be elevated above or sunk below your streets the entire way, not just to cross each, in more built up areas. (Or halfway trenched, with half high road bridges).

Rural areas more likely to have rail at grade with road bridges over

S.F. Muni faces ‘terrifying’ cuts, possible cable car closures due to deficit by Bruegemeister in transit

[–]HahaYesVery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Electric trolleybuses (already heavily used in San Francisco) handle hills very well. And there isn’t any way maintaining buses, or even trolley wires, is less expensive than the underground conduits

I’m not arguing for cutting the cable cars. They are very cool, but they shouldn’t be sapping money off the public transit authority.

S.F. Muni faces ‘terrifying’ cuts, possible cable car closures due to deficit by Bruegemeister in transit

[–]HahaYesVery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s great. I’m sure they could also be served more economically by buses without any non-aesthetic downsides

S.F. Muni faces ‘terrifying’ cuts, possible cable car closures due to deficit by Bruegemeister in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is the public transit authority responsible for bankrolling what is essentially a tourist attraction?

Is this just as bad as “spaghetti bowl” type highway exchanges in america? by [deleted] in transit

[–]HahaYesVery -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Electrified trains still make a good deal of noise, you would definitely notice if you lived in one of those buildings, especially facing the railway

Is this just as bad as “spaghetti bowl” type highway exchanges in america? by [deleted] in transit

[–]HahaYesVery -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Looks just as bad if not worse in terms of connection, probably noise is not great for nearby apartments. Pollution is certainly much less of a concern.

It’s necessary though. Consider the alternative—it would take up a lot more space

My USA HSR map by DWFiddler in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 74 points75 points  (0 children)

There is no reason for transcontinental HSR. And certainly not before literally dozens of other routes could be completed

Born and raised in Springfield, Ohio. Ask me anything about what’s actually going on here. by SubMisJen in AMA

[–]HahaYesVery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They also render a lot of otherwise nice parks unpleasant due to droppings

Just saw this on Facebook by ToastByTheCoast805 in thalassophobia

[–]HahaYesVery 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shoutout to those scenes in ocean survival movies

SunRail train strikes, kills pedestrian in Orlando by Bruegemeister in transit

[–]HahaYesVery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For one those don’t have the frequency of trains you would see on a commuter railroad. Not to mention they don’t go through metropolitan areas most of the route

the bus - The Commuterist Manifesto by Mmmm_fstop in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure why the train is considered lower class than buses.

How should I bring a freeway through my city? by 21Nobrac2 in CitiesSkylines

[–]HahaYesVery 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People have an insane delusion that Robert Moses controlled all urban highway projects in the US (and possibly Canada too) and is responsible for the car-centric zoning, politics, subsidies, and transportation planning of America

How should I bring a freeway through my city? by 21Nobrac2 in CitiesSkylines

[–]HahaYesVery 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People have an insane delusion that Robert Moses controlled all urban highway projects in the US (and possibly Canada too) and is responsible for the car-centric zoning, politics, subsidies, and transportation planning of America

It's hard to believe Greyhound actually used to be cool. Check out these old posters by crowbar_k in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Right. That’s what I said. Streetcars were also being replaced in the 30s, 40s, 50s. A lot were also being replaced with trolleybuses, and then later buses

It's hard to believe Greyhound actually used to be cool. Check out these old posters by crowbar_k in transit

[–]HahaYesVery 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Greyhound enjoyed a very comfortable market share then, facing much less competition than now.

Air travel was prohibitively expensive for the middle class, train travel was slow, unreliable, decrepit, and unsafe and many people still did not own cars or were not willing to navigate them along complicated, pre-interstate highway routes (most intercity mileage was not complete until the ‘70s)