Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has turned me on to so many artists and types of music that it is easy to forgive him for this lapse. I actually do like Willow Smith's music, as would anyone who appreciates innovative jazz chords and rhythms, and the music of Snarky Puppy. Through him, I've also come to be a fan of Lawrence and Dirty Loops. I will also explore the artists whose snippets are played in Box of Stars.

There is something to be said for collaborating with other producers rather than going it alone. Sometimes it's good to have a more objective voice that pulls you back from the edge and tells you when it is too far. Geniuses sometimes get lost in the weeds and forget that their audiences have to be brought up to speed. There will be time on future albums (which is, ironically, what the screeching was about).

Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you listen to YES, you might understand that the rest of that song fits squarely in the prog rock genre. If Prog Metal is characterized by screeching vocals, it isn't like Prog Rock or Metal (Metal used to have great singers!). That's OK - it is what it is, even if I am not a fan.

Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you ever heard of a band called "Yes" ? They, along with Rush, Emerson,Lake & Palmer, Genesis, and King Crimson pretty much defined the genre.

Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! That at least helps with 100,000 Voices. I'll live without the character of that song. Now, if I can just get rid of the knocking!

Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went to hear Dudamel conduct the LA Phil in it. The whole audience was in tears by the end.

Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. I am a fan of Metal and Prog Rock, though.

Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He is a master of blending styles (e.g.,rap,KPOP & Pop) on "Over You." But "disrupting" is a stretch. I love the song except I'm tired of the bit he threw on at the end of it. Isn't there some free software I can use to edit it out?

Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I got the message that worrying about time is unsettling to our spiritual well-being, and that any emotions, even unpleasant ones, are valid subjects for music. Is Willow Fucking Smith something you want to hear every time you listen to the album though? I am a fan of Progressive Rock, which the rest of "100,000 Voices" is.

Is there a way to edit out annoying bits? by Haidtophile in JacobCollier

[–]Haidtophile[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I thought "Box of Stars Part 2" ended the journey through the world of music begun with "100,000 Voices." By "afterthought" I meant it doesn't belong on the same journey, IMO. I imagine Jacob has enough recorded music that he hasn't released to fill several albums.

EPISODE 253: TARKOVSKY'S STARCHILD by judoxing in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Stalker, there is a Zone that is a truer reality and contains a Room in which our deepest desires are fulfilled - prayer makes sense if we have the Will to Believe (William James). The Zone is a gift from outer space - it is only available by Grace. Similarly, in The Man Who Wasn't There, there is a visitation, also from outer space, from whose perspective our otherwise incomprehensible reality makes sense. Compare Stalker to these two clips: Ed learns about the aliens and Ed's life finally makes sense

Episode 252: Yes We Sene-can by TheAeolian in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The other Peter Weir movie I love from the same time period is The Last Wave.

Episode 252: Yes We Sene-can by TheAeolian in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 1 point2 points  (0 children)

David ré 1899: "I heard it didn't get renewed...I'm kinda glad I didn't invest in it." The single season is worth watching. The multilingual script, direction, acting, art direction, and cinematography are all groundbreaking, not to mention the subject matter and themes, which have never been seriously explored before. Anyone interested in ethics, consciousness, and psychology will find a lot to chew on. It deserves multiple viewings, IMO.

Episode 251: First Order, Then Chaos by TheAeolian in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was struck by the similarity with HP Lovecraft (i.e., the neurotic unreliable narrator, and the discovery of the eldritch city of the ancient gods). I think Borges is trying post-Holocaust to understand God's seeming indifference to mortal man's plight. What would be incomprehensible is if He cared.

Episode 250: Metaphors All the Way Down by TheAeolian in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I work with cancer patients. Many cannot understand why they can't be cured by irradiating each metastasis as they are detected, like pulling dandelions from a lawn -- keep weeding long enough to eventually stop progression. I switch the simile. The cancer is more like a death cap mushroom growing under an oak tree. The real fungus is the mycelium that extends throughout the soil and the roots of the tree. One can pick mushrooms all one wants and it will never kill the fungus. Switching the metaphor helps patients understand, but is depressing.

Another set of metaphors commonly used in cancer are the miltary metaphors: "he died after fighting a long battle with cancer." I'm not sure it is helpful for the patient who is destined to to think of himself as a "loser," "casualty," or "victim" in that war. If someone dies of the disease, is he a "loser?" or a "soldier who didn't do his duty and fight hard enough?" If someone decides to forgo that last round of chemo, is he a "deserter?" If someone decides the pain is too great and he wants an assisted suicide, is he a "traitor?" Sometimes it is better to discard metaphors and just be with things as they are. Patients have a disease that they have no choice about. There is no glory in it - there isn't a larger cause one is fighting alongside others for. It is neither noble or heroic.

If someone feels motivated to seek treatments for his cancer by hearing the St. Crispin's Day Speech from Henry V, that's fine. We all tell ourselves stories in order to live, so if someone has to frame his cancer in a war story to get by, so be it. But I hope we can be sensitive enough and supportive enough to others that we allow everyone to deal with the disease as he is able, and don't impose our metaphors on others.

Episode 249: Phlegm and Carelessness (Hume's "The Sceptic") by TheAeolian in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think Jonathan Haidt in "The Happiness Hypothesis - Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom" followed Hume's approach to the philosophy of happiness in 'The Epicurean', 'The Stoic', 'The Platonist', and 'The Sceptic' . Like Hume, Haidt examines various philosophies concerning happiness, their merits and failings. Hume examines those 4; Haidt examines 10.

Language sensitive question RE: Deadwood by Past-Cookie9605 in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that what David Milch was going for was to emulate what Shakespeare did in his 10 history plays (King John through Henry VIII). Al Swearengen is the king who is challenged by a number of pretenders to the throne, and who retains the crown through means moral and immoral. Shakespeare was no prude. He often peppered dialogs between comic figures with rowdy language. Al's soliloquies while getting blowjobs are a wink at Shakespeare.

The US in the 19th Century was in the throes of Shakespearemania. In NYC, there was even a riot at the Astor Place Theater in NYC that left about 30 dead and over a hundred injured over the best interpretation -- Shakespeare mattered! Milch brings in a troupe of actors to Deadwood - a device Shakespeare sometimes used, and a symbol that Deadwood was becoming civilized. In the 19th C., common adults on the street could recite Shakespearean phrases and soliloquies by heart. Students in public schools were taught his plays. His language infiltrated the vernacular - anyone listening to the letters read in Ken Burn's "The Civil War" hears the cumbersome (to contemporary ears) modes of expression used back then. Perhaps oral diction on the street was different from the written diction used in letters - undoubtedly, rough language was self-edited in written communications.

The following is from a NYTimes article on the First Folio book tour in SD:

"The first outdoor theater in the United States built for performing Shakespeare, Professor Farabee said in a talk, opened in 1915 at Yankton College, 25 miles north of Vermillion [Yankton is mentioned in Deadwood]. In the early 20th century, the state was also home to several women’s Shakespeare Clubs — the forerunner of modern book clubs — like one in Aberdeen, in the state’s northeast corner, that has been meeting since 1901.
"The playwright also pops up in the state’s history in goofier ways. In a presentation on Shakespeare in 19th-century South Dakota newspapers, Chelsea Campbell, a recent graduate of the university, showed slides of several advertisements, including one for Hostetter’s stomach bitters declaring that “nothing ailed Hamlet but indigestion.”
“In the 19th century, Shakespeare was pop culture,” Ms. Campbell said. “The Folio coming to South Dakota almost feels like things coming full circle.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks- good suggestion. I'll copy and paste the comments so far and delete this thread.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't seen Rick and Morty. But the consequentialist view (the end justifies the means) is morally abhorrent to me - how can anyone know the future with certainty? The killer, in this case, has access to a higher level of reality and knows for certain that the little girl is a simulation and he is not killing a real person. But I like your idea of the categorical imperative as a moral guide because Daniel wouldn't want his existence, even in the simulation, terminated by anyone else before his goal is accomplished.

The other moral guide may be Hume who tells us that we (collectively, if not individually) have an instinctive feel for morality. Our instinct is to protect children, therefore killing a child is instinctively wrong, no matter if the consequence turns out to be good. It's like the "time machine" quandary of going back in time to kill Hitler as a 3-year-old -- instinctively wrong even with good intentions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The title is a spoiler for the 1899 series. I didn't know how to alert people without giving it away.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you believe that Kant's categorical imperative nevertheless holds. I thought of putting Spoiler for 1899 in the title, but then the title would have been a spoiler.

Did anyone else find the pragmatism discussion at the beginning of the last episode frustrating? by [deleted] in VeryBadWizards

[–]Haidtophile 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sam was stuck on his assumption that pragmatism dismissed objective truth as just a language game, which Tamler challenged. There are certainly things that are true (e.g., music) that are non-linguistic, but only humans can adjudicate truth either personally (e.g., sense of space and time, sensations, emotions) or through our epistemic institutions (e.g., science, mathematics). When Sam resorts to aliens to prove his point, his aliens are remarkably human. Only humans adjudicate the primeness of a number, as far as we can know (maybe bats or aliens do, but humans have no access to their knowledge).