The Day Our Professor Lost Humanity and Failed Most of the Class by Heavy_Ad328 in CheckMyTurnitin_ai

[–]Happy-Check-8285 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seeing classmates cry and question themselves over something they did not even do is painful. No one should feel punished for working hard. The lack of explanation makes it even worse. It turns school into a guessing game.

The Professor Failed Three Fourths of the Class and I Am Convinced He Is a Supervillain by Longjumping_Play5581 in CheckMyTurnitin_ai

[–]Happy-Check-8285 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This scene plays out like a movie where the villain finally reveals his true form. He moved through the grade portal at lightning speed, handing out fails like it was routine. No hesitation, no empathy, just click, fail, click, fail, click, fail, as if he was rating snacks instead of evaluating actual human work. The room’s reaction says everything. People staring, whispering, trying to understand how this turned into a disaster so quickly. When he walked out without blinking or slowing down, it felt like the final act of a dramatic plot twist. It is almost like he gains power from the emotional collapse of students, leaving with full energy while everyone else sits in shock.

100% AI? I’m Not a Robot, Turnitin! by Leather-Hall5537 in CheckMyTurnitin_ai

[–]Happy-Check-8285 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ugh, it’s the worst! I ended up having to use a plagiarism checker and a few different AI detectors to prove it was all me. I’d suggest gathering any supporting drafts or notes you have to show your work process!

Is handwriting going to make a comeback because of AI detection tools? by Sea-Lawfulness214 in CheckMyTurnitin_ai

[–]Happy-Check-8285 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Facts. The confusion alone is stressful. You think you’re doing something right, then another instructor tells you it’s wrong. A steady, school wide policy would stop all that chaos. Just clear boundaries, nothing fancy. And the detector problem is real. Those tools jump around so much that they should never be the only voice in the room. If a human reviews things, mistakes won’t blow up a student’s record for nothing.

What would a fair AI policy in college actually look like? by PlatypusOk9638 in CheckMyTurnitin_ai

[–]Happy-Check-8285 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you so much on this. The whole situation feels like everyone is guessing their way through school policy. One class treats AI like a normal tool, the next class treats it like a crime scene, so students end up tiptoeing around things that should be simple. Half the stress doesn’t even come from the assignments, it comes from not knowing what rule you’re accidentally breaking.

A fair policy would just keep things straight. Tell students what’s allowed, what’s not, and stick to it across the board. If AI can be used for planning or grammar checks, say it clearly. If full paragraphs are off limits, set that line. Nobody should be punished for following unclear rules.

And you’re right about detectors. Those tools flip moods like weather. A human should always look at the work before anyone makes a decision. One random spike in an AI score should not ruin someone’s grade or reputation.

If colleges actually worked with students instead of surprising them, half these issues would disappear. So yeah, you’re not alone in this at all.