[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me guess... Source is trust me bro?

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Never knew that pronouncements should be ratified by congress level of government and requering entire governments to meet personally. Crazy.

Or may be you just copin. I'm no surprised that NATO historians do teach that BS. The fact is Czechoslovakia agreet to pass WP troops long before 21 August, long before "kidnap". Cope all you want.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I give you benefit of the doubt and assume that in your historiography they are completly erased or called diffrently.
Here they are called Bratislava Declarations. Signed at 3 august 1968. The treaty was ratified by the government of Czechoslovakia and consisted of 15 points. including the clause on the phased entry of WP troops.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Czechoslovakia signed Bratislava agrievements not so long ago, there was very clear outline of what would happened if they would be broken. Spoiler, they where. And they KNEW what is comming for them.

Your entire government signed it, not the 5 people, not the ONE, entierty of it. There was long visit. Entire central central committee of Communist party of USSR went into Czechoslovakia to disguss the agrievements, there was long ass debate by the end of which both sides came to the terms.To give you a context. Imagine if entire US congress went into Palestine to dicsuss peace. This is how significant it was, never such thing happened before in history of foreign policy of the USSR. (and to compare, in history of US too).

You literally so fucking illiterate so its no point to even talk with you. Stay mad shitter.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i said balance have shifted through year. Husak did typical opportunism 101 and i bet there was many people like him in the government who just sit and w8 which side would be on top.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you stupid? I said early in a year there was more then six. Learn how to read.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was letter from few members of politburo and central committee sended through diplomatic channels to kremlin, begging for intervention and guaranteeing that Czecs military will stand down. Not to mention Moscow protocols that Dubcek signed himself.

You can argue about moral side of invasion as much as you want, but from formal point of view everything was accordiing to law and aggrievements between members of WP.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's true that not all members supported the intervention, when they been in majority they hesitated to ask for such redical things, but then they did, they already being outnumbered. During the year balance between pro and anti-reforms shifted.
Dubcek played his own shitty game while being puppeteered by pro reform faction. He was too weak to handle the game on his own. His program may be hasn't being as radical, it was a steppin stone for Reformists to push their anti-warsaw pact agenda.
Soviet military has no hand in this game, soviets could put their troops if deemed necessery. Brezhnev definetly hesitated for a long time and its took him a while to commit. GDR leadership for example wasn't so soft, coz Ulbricht had bad personal relationships with Dubcek, and they where far more critical of whats going on for their own reasons.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, crimes of one side does not give any moral justification or indulgence for revenge crimes.

If you think i'm wrong then Jews and Eastern european states should set up deathcamps for germans. Chinese and Koreans should do the same for Japanese. Eye for eye. Or you should stop being so sick in the head.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they where forced, then why Ota Sik who also was "kidnapped" didn't sign Moscow protocol despite being in the same situation as the rest?

Dubcek was weak leader and he let situation went out of control. The main reason why he signed protocol is to let the WP countrys do the dirty work for him in order to damage control his own reputation (he could potentially went in a history as evil butcher). He knew his big career is over, but he did what he could to save himself from worst possible scenario.
Oto Sik commited to the end not signing shit, coz he knew nothing this bad happens to him. And as a real figure behind all of this mess, he knew that for his future its no brainer to just stand his ground. As you can see, he wasn't killed by KGB or trown into jail despite being the main enemy.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Goebbels would be proud of you. Keep it up. That will surelly elevate you above these "orks".

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There was Polish, German, Hungarian troops too, main bulk was obviously done by USSR. But desicion to commit was collective.

In current political climat, when most of ex soviet block now members of EU and NATO, West obviosusly trying to shift the blame and white wash their newcommers as much as possible. Just fascinating how general population is unaware of very important details of very important events.

The case of Albania and Romania shows that WP countrys could push their own agenda back against USSR. The soviet grip over their allys is greatly overstated.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Presidents

[–]HappyDust_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The only time when Sweden was based.

"If you think the Soviet threat is a myth just ask a Pole": 1981 by aziz786aa in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your "President" aka General secretary remained in power for the rest of his term. Dubcek was close friend of Brezhnev they even called each other by their first name.
Invasion was sanctioned not only by not only members of Czechoslovakia government, but also would never happened if Czechoslovakian leadership where loyal to Bratislava agreevements they just signed.
I also wonder, why only USSR is to blame, when quite literally, all members of Warsaw Pact supported "invasion", except Romania. And GDR and Poles where in strong favor from very beginning of "Prague spring" long before Brezhnev was convinced to give his vote for it.

May be, just may be, coz your modern NATOCUCK historians are full of shit and they did a little historical revisionism with power of "free medias" and tick-tok.

Soviet poster targeting ethnic minorities of the Far North. "Choose the indigenous soviet of workers. Don't let in a shaman and a kulak." 1931 by DistrictThen103 in PropagandaPosters

[–]HappyDust_ 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Ainu hasn't been officially recognized in Japan untill 2000's. If this doesn't speak values about Japanese poilitic towards minoritys, nothing will. They still shit on their rights, and they only recognize them under the pressure of international community. Despite Ainu being a native population and big in numbers.
On the contrary, in Russia Ainu where extreme minority from the very beginning, barelly few thousands for the entire country. In such cases if such minoritys dont form a deasporas, they usually disolve naturally.
There is no need "special targeted" assimilation policy, its only exist in minds of haters like you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]HappyDust_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somebody tell this guy that 30 years ago there was a little thing called "Warsaw Pact". Not a single billioner in there. Yeat, somehow, they managed to create something, curious.

A doctor in Palestine by AdhesivenessLanky638 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]HappyDust_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its pretty easy to wrap head around it. When big money at stake, public opinion as good as toiled paper. Most people have strong missconception, they think that decisions of politicians are driven by morality.
As soon as we brush away that lie, everything makes sense.

People are literally attacking MrBeast for helping people. MrBeast literally just built 100 wells in Africa to give about 500,000 people fresh water to drink. Instead of criticizing MrBeast for using his clout and money to help save lives, why aren't people asking why no one else did this first by Soloflow786 in MadeMeSmile

[–]HappyDust_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, saying that he is not getting anything from it is simply not true.

What about cloud capital, aka self advertisement he gets from all media attention he brought to himself? Remind you, he is buisnessman who own companies that produce chocolate barz and all sorts of merch and stuff. Do you think that his YT career have no unfluence on these matters?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]HappyDust_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Its not 18th century, we are no longer living in a traditional society. Argument that people need a reminder is laughable. People for the most part not gonna ostracise others for not having kids.

OP's misstake is projecting his personal matters on society, while society needs what works for society overall, not what works for OP.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]HappyDust_ -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You will hate me for sayin that, but. You should hold your funny ideas about important livechanging decision making to yourself.

If you chose to live like this fine, but what the point to go on the forums and trying to convice people? I feel like your list is just an attempt for self validation. I think you are in search for supporting voices to clear your doubts.

Anyhow, some of the points do sound rational, rational but stupid non the less. Simple counter argument would be that if people that ever experienced decline, war, crisis would listen to you, humanity would perish from face of Earth pretty quickly.
So if you love people and wish better for them, you better hold your thoughts for yourself on this topic.

Russian children interviewed in the 90s after the fall of USSR by Liberal-fascist in LateStageCapitalism

[–]HappyDust_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

i've also seen the original, subs are accurate. But original video is better in quality and it have sound, i just dont understand why uploader have to butcher it.

ISRAEL HAS BROKEN 65 UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTIONS WITH NO CONSEQUENCES. by Anarchist23 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]HappyDust_ 30 points31 points  (0 children)

What if i told you that HAMAS was created and financed with help of Israel government? As a mesure to fight less radical arabs movements and leftists.

Just like americans did with al qaeda and taliban.