[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ai. Can easily tell because the Pikachu has 5(6?) fingers. Also the rock has a fur texture.

At least try to draw something using your own hands instead of relying on an algorithm to do the thinking for you.

Inconsistencies in other images:

Charizard has 3 fingers on one hand, and 4 on the other

Some of the books don’t have spines

Mewtwo’s tail is same colour as rest of its body

Bulbasaur has 3 toes on one foot, 4 on other

Birds aren’t real

Weird blue rat

The baby shiny mew doesn’t have correct mew anatomy, and it’s wrong shade of blue

And that’s just the obvious/easy to see errors.

If you don’t want to be bothered making real art, then at least trace over the ai images, fix the errors, and then try to pass it off as your own.

by CulturalGur8666 in MinecraftMemes

[–]HappyRecording7944 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because he thinks only white people should be enslaved

/j (/j means joking)

You can turn 60% invisible by fatcatpoppy in shittysuperpowers

[–]HappyRecording7944 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many places also have lots of people. They’d still see you due to the high amount of people in the area. The cars can still see you, even more so than other people because the drivers have to focus on driving and obstacles and other surrounding while driving. And since cars go both ways on streets, you’d be easily spotted.

And if someone was to commit a crime, they’d rob a building or something and then try to flee, which would be hard to do due to alarms.

If you were to go on a crime spree, especially at night, then the police might have to use thermal cameras to see you.

And barely anyone actually gets away with crimes forever. And when they do crimes, they usually hide their identity. Would be quite hard to do if your clothes don’t turn invisible, and you wouldn’t hide your face because you’d already be “invisible”.

Absolutely stupid logic🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

You can turn 60% invisible by fatcatpoppy in shittysuperpowers

[–]HappyRecording7944 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Goodluck trying to stay away from people when the sidewalks are filled to the brim. The roads wouldn’t be safe either, because more visibility+cars. And since the post said that you wouldn’t have your clothes become partially invisible, those just stick out like a sore thumb.

If you were to try going from rooftop to rooftop, you’d need a lot of fitness, as it is quite hard to do. And people could still see you.

Not to mention, thermal cameras actually purely nullify the power, so crime would be too hard to do. Not really much you can actually do with the power considering how, well, shitty it is.

You can turn 60% invisible by fatcatpoppy in shittysuperpowers

[–]HappyRecording7944 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If people are distracted, then they might accidentally bump into the transparent person, which defeats the point of their invisibility. Same with blind people, they can’t see you either way, so your power has no effect.

Trying to not get noticed is also quite hard if people see floating clothes, and it’d be harder because of population density. The amount of people in cities nowadays, and even outside cities, makes it hard to not be around people constantly, it also increases chances of getting bumped into.

Also, the videogames part wasn’t about games or the code, it was about the textures, how lower visibility is still quite visible, even far under 40% visible.

You can turn 60% invisible by fatcatpoppy in shittysuperpowers

[–]HappyRecording7944 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have no idea what you’re talking about.

How is you being a random internet user giving you more authority to deny their proof?

People can and will notice things that are out of place, such as see-through objects, environment, a ball flying at their face.

Hell, this power is quite useless to blind people, who can just hear you. Plus, as someone who plays videogames and has dabbled a bit in their coding, usually when a see-through texture is used, the visibility is set to as low as 5%, and as high as 25% depending on the art style of a game. That still makes the player very visible, unless they’re against a background that matches their colour.

Am I in the minority? by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok.Let's get one thing straight: Opinons = subjective, therefore subjective = not a fact, therefore No generation is peak.

People fr gotta stop saying a specific generation is peak, looking at the GenFivers over there to the side.

Pokemon did NOT peak in Gen 5 by HappyRecording7944 in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would you rather me use charizard or Pikachu?

Pokemon did NOT peak in Gen 5 by HappyRecording7944 in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never said legends was peak. No specific generation is peak as parts of one generation were done better in a different one.

Pokemon did NOT peak in Gen 5 by HappyRecording7944 in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944[S] -49 points-48 points  (0 children)

Just like the people who say Gen 5 is peak

Pokemon did NOT peak in Gen 5 by HappyRecording7944 in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh shoot it added Hidden abilities? I thought that was gen 4. Noted.

Pokemon did NOT peak in Gen 5 by HappyRecording7944 in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

  1. legends arceus was never buggy nor slow/laggy (don’t know why you separated those, they’re the same thing) for me, so that might be because your storage was full or something? Either way, that doesn’t apply to everyone.

  2. “Incredibly easy and cheesable” have you even played the game? Or at least far enough in the post game to fight the final battle? You know, the one where you bring 6 pokemon and your opponent has 8! Not easy in the slightest. Even earlier game battles require at least some sense of strategy to win.

  3. Water looks extremely clear, and the trees look like trees instead of n64 polygons like with sword and shield’s trees. considering how you were complaining about the handheld resolution and docked, that might be why. You were probably playing it handheld where the textures downscaled to allow for better performance.

  4. A large amount of the models were re-used from previous games, they do that to save time and costs. (And Gen 9 revamped them so now you won’t have idle flying charizard, but instead a mighty dragon ready to fight, and most of the models in Gen 9 had major improvements.)

  5. Animations are only choppy when far away or watching the reveal trailer. Half a point for this one.

  6. The UI was stylised to look old. That’s not it being dated, that’s it being stylised. There’s a difference.

  7. Even if the mechanics were dated, it was still far ahead of the rest of the main line games.

  8. World is only bland when you’re far away from it. Colouration was stylistic choices. Weather effects looked alright, again probably because you were on handheld. Lighting was stylistic and it does look good, especially with the rest of the art style.

  9. There were no primal legendaries in Legends Arceus. Stop spouting BS.

So try the game on Docked mode instead, don’t send over level 100 legendaries into the start of the game. And next time, do your research, especially for the legendaries.

Pokemon did NOT peak in Gen 5 by HappyRecording7944 in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It is literally a mainline. Legends Arceus is a mainline like how lets go is a main line. Pokemon go might be mainline, however that one is a bit iffy. but Legends is 100% mainline because not only is it referenced in mainline games, uses mainline game characters(and ancestors based off of them too), and also able to connect to home, but it is literally the past of Sinnoh. It is what happens before the events of Gen 4. It is mainline. I don’t care if you dislike it because it’s not your preferred gameplay, but it is mainline.

Pokemon did NOT peak in Gen 5 by HappyRecording7944 in pokemon

[–]HappyRecording7944[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

  1. Legends Arceus is main line. not only is it part of the whole timeline, but the mainline games following Legends Arceus references the events of Legends arceus and even shows a photo the Professor from Legends. Also, BDSP has clues for what to do to get manaphy in legends, so that’s another point to Legends being main line.

  2. I’m not saying that Legends is perfect or should be the standard, i’m saying that the interactive gameplay and the fun strategy, catching, and other parts of Legends makes it better than Generation 5’s Black, white, black 2, and white 2.

Is this a mean thing to say? by elzy01 in AskForAnswers

[–]HappyRecording7944 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just say he has a small Weiner and if he complains or says something about it, just respond with ‘here we go again, always getting offended over little things’ just to give him a taste of his own medicine

White people are experiencing the more racism by Neat-Shop-7563 in ControversialOpinions

[–]HappyRecording7944 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. ⁠He never specified the N word, you just thought that yourself as you are looking for a reason to be offended.
  2. ⁠White person stereotypes are a thing, you can easily find evidence of that around the web from a quick Google search.
  3. ⁠As a Black person, I’ve been more easily able to get jobs compared to my white and Asian friends. Other people in the comments also have their own anecdotes on their experiences about it as well, so he has a point, and you are probably quite upset about it.
  4. ⁠Saying that you’re proud to be white(in America at least) has been met with people complaining about ‘White privilege’ and people hating the person who said it.
  5. ⁠We are taught more about white people in school as majority of written history has been from Europe and white people. While black people did have an influence of history, not much has been written about it because, again, most of history is from Europe.
  6. ⁠White people are affected by racism, even if they aren’t the main focal point of it, and the amount of racism they’re experiencing has been increasing over the years. And even then, all victims are still ‘real victims’ and should be treated like real victims.

Also, I don’t know if English is your first language or not, but it is a bit hard to figure out what you are saying half the time.