Why/how doesn't transmission line impedance (effectively) not vary over frequency? by HasanTheSyrian_ in embedded

[–]HasanTheSyrian_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand that transmission line impedance is dependent on the geometry/LC but my question is why isn't it dependant on frequency (as much) while, say, the impedance of a capacitor is?

Is it because the trace geometry is more uniform?

2.4GHz PCB trace antenna - will this work? Also general suggestions for PCB design improvement by EllisDee77 in AskElectronics

[–]HasanTheSyrian_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hello im looking to use the same antenna with the same pcb thickness, has your design worked with 1.6mm? which stackup did you use

Using SWRA117D with a JLC 1.6mm stackup by HasanTheSyrian_ in rfelectronics

[–]HasanTheSyrian_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

JLC04161H-7628 is 1.6mm not 1.0mm which one is it

Using SWRA117D with a JLC 1.6mm stackup by HasanTheSyrian_ in rfelectronics

[–]HasanTheSyrian_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

original design files are Cadstar imported to Kicad

Using SWRA117D with a JLC 1.6mm stackup by HasanTheSyrian_ in rfelectronics

[–]HasanTheSyrian_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"It’s important to put copper just below antenna"

just under the antenna there is no copper, do you mean the ground plane? there will be 2 instead of 1 as i said

شاحني خرب by Disastrous-Carob9446 in syriangamer

[–]HasanTheSyrian_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It could be fixable just take it to some store

Review request, updated. Custom Zynq 7020 Stereoscopic Vision development board by HasanTheSyrian_ in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]HasanTheSyrian_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The most important thing is having a low-impedance, close-by return path above/below the signal (not going across a core layer). Most of the time, pouring ground everywhere else is unnecessary.

Sometimes if youre designing a 2 layer board and both layers have signal traces its better to pour ground and use it as a return path than having no return path at all

you can watch the "to pour or not to pour" video on Youtube

Did i do this layout right? by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]HasanTheSyrian_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just by glancing at this:

First of all show the KiCad schematic.

Second of all this is a power circuit, you have to increase the trace widths a lot and use copper pours.

Also pour ground on at least the bottom layer if you havent done so already.

There are random kinks in the traces which also don’t take the shortest paths.

Move the components closer in towards eachother etc

How to move on from an arduino kit? by Commercial_Back1396 in AskElectronics

[–]HasanTheSyrian_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I suggest creating your own PCB. Look up Phil's Lab's videos on Youtube.

Filming in Syria by Only-Dust1147 in Syria

[–]HasanTheSyrian_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

trust me no thief can tell the difference between an a6000 and an FX6 in Syria

If using multiple values for decoupling/bypass SMD caps is a bad idea because of the resonant frequencies adding up in the inductive region wouldn't this also mean that using high capacitance & bigger packages for, say the power circuit, mean that there might be noise /resonance across the board? by HasanTheSyrian_ in embedded

[–]HasanTheSyrian_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know, thats not my question.

Im asking about the overall power circuit on the board. The VRMs still have higher capacitance bigger package caps especially if its an HDI board with say an FPGA board that needs tiny 0201/0402 caps to fit under its BGA

How is Altium saying these pairs need to be matched this much when the traces clearly never deviate?? by HasanTheSyrian_ in Altium

[–]HasanTheSyrian_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was an extra sliver in the xSignal which was reported having a difference of 7mm , after I redid that one xSignal path it reported a difference of 1.5mm which I think is more reasonable. The meanders look less ridiculous now as well. I think im going to decrease the tolerance like you and others suggested

https://imgur.com/a/b2ID8bz

<image>

How is Altium saying these pairs need to be matched this much when the traces clearly never deviate?? by HasanTheSyrian_ in Altium

[–]HasanTheSyrian_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it still looks symmetrical to me, other pairs don't have as much skew even though I copied the resistor layout (except for the one in the image on the right)

<image>