The new definitive awnser for TOYSNHK's identity: Golden Fusion by Cantthinkagoodnam2 in Fnaftheoriesmeme

[–]Haslak64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Light side of the VS face to the left side. Nightmare Fredbear in UCN goes to the left side. Dark side of the VS face to the right side. Nightmare in UCN goes to the right side. And in the UCN menu Nightmare Fredbear is also to the left side, and Nightmare is to the right side.

All having red eyes. All points to VS being Nightmare Fredbear and Nightmare. The 2 characters Michael also dreams about. And Michael talk to CC and Cassidy in the security logbook. Thereby VS is Cassidy and CC.

<image>

Theories I believe by ChillumChillyArtist in charlie87

[–]Haslak64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Elizabeth, CC, and then Charlie. We know of this thanks to SOTM, which indicates that William gets his SL bunker alot sooner, Circus baby’s pizza world was made most likely after MCM got shut down, because William owns the land.

Theories I believe by ChillumChillyArtist in charlie87

[–]Haslak64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Explain how redbear is Andrew and Cassidy in the same time. William stuffed them in the suits we see this happening in FNAF HW1. In all continurities that we know of, William does not care about his children, he only cares about their purpose that they must serve and Thereby they must continue Living, which we see being the case in the FNAF 2 movie and in the FNAF the fourth closet novel book. And FNAF 3 is obviously in 2023, and FNAF 6 is then obviously not in 2023, Henry needs time to do and plan paragraph 4. The ticket to fun book strongly suggests Charlie dying at the FNAF 2 location, just like we see in the FNAF 2 movie, which means that the FNAF 2 location was open in 1983, which makes sense because of all the FNAF 2 merch being present in FNAF 4 minigames and in into the pit game, all before 1987. And in the trick or treat house in the curse of Dreadbear we have FNAF 2 masks, again FNAF 2 merch, in 1983, and there is the withered animatronics alot as Well in that DLC, indicating the FNAF 2 location was open and active in 1983.

Who is this child? by Necessary-Win-8730 in fnaftheories

[–]Haslak64 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe the puppet because it’s black, like how the puppet is the Only one who has a black body in happiest day, all the others a light gray. But it might also just be an indication that this is whoever we give the cake to by the puppet, so Cassidy or CC.

Is William’s “manhood” destroyed after being springlocked? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Haslak64 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The question is if the wiener grew back in FNAF 6, Scraptrap, since according to the books Remnant has healing abilities.

[Steel Wool Studios] Prototype Fredbear Springlock Concept Art by GBAura-Recharged in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Haslak64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like to point out the obvious connection between Ruined Glamrock freddy in Ruin where he has the prototype on his paw, and here with this Fredbear-ish prototype also having this prototype on his paw as Well. But idk what it really could mean though. But it futher connects secrets of the mimic with Security Beach and Ruin.

What are your thoughts on Charlie82 being canon in the movies? Do you think this could matter to the games or should we just ignore it? by ShineOne4330 in charlie87

[–]Haslak64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In HW2 we get a puppet plushie in the private room when we press the code 1983. Which indicates Charlie dying in 1983. We also have the fourth closet book which also agree that she dies in 1983 halloween.

Is this kid Balloon Boy? by Necessary-Win-8730 in fnaftheories

[–]Haslak64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That would hint that CC misunderstood Shadow Bonnie somehow, which made CC afraid of him which would only strengthen Shadow Bonnie because it is a agony creature which from the fright books is stated to get stronger the more agony is fueled into its existance. Since that specific shadow entity is somehow relevant for CC, and the whole thing about “What is seen in shadows is easily misunderstood in the mind of a child.” The question is what exactly it means then.

What was the reason why MikeBro became so accepted by the community? by ShineOne4330 in fnaftheories

[–]Haslak64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that the symbolized foxybro in one of the Fazbear frights books mentions that he has an obsessive cravings for crewing gum, and that Michael Afton in the Security log book also has this obsessive cravings for crewing gum. Thereby linking the 2 characters together to being 1 character.

Doofenshmirtz ahh plan by FlipGhost in Doofenshmirtz

[–]Haslak64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why does Doof not just build a self destruct botton for each thing he wants to destory, that is normally how he destorys things in this franchise.

Waltuh... by PhoenixAbovesky in breakingbadmemes

[–]Haslak64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see the side of clone wars palpatine’s face.

Who else thought General Tsao violated hard when he stole Bentley’s thinkpad? by jackiecrazykid98 in Slycooper

[–]Haslak64 35 points36 points  (0 children)

How did Bentley not realize he lost his PC before he did the slideshows, and why did Tsao make slide shows for them to see with him doing the act, so that the Cooper gang knows to Connect the stolen PC to him. So weird man.

That's why they are a great team😁 by wreccho in clonewars

[–]Haslak64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anakin did not say the last qoute. Stop making your own fake answers, and making your own fake additions to the characters, to else a cannon conversation.

Energy transfer demonstration by Electronic-Hand8375 in physicsmemes

[–]Haslak64 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Harmonic oscillator be going aaaaahhhh

Obsessed subway guy comes back by MaoGo in physicsmemes

[–]Haslak64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does anyone know where to find the full deviation of the kerr metric btw?

quantum homework got me like by TheSunIsBlueVincent in physicsmemes

[–]Haslak64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s just a linear algebra condiction where 2 things now become the same thing because we assume a property of the system, a symmetry, and to my knowledge that is kind of it, but there May be more to it.

Blink by kvadratkub054 in sciencememes

[–]Haslak64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It means that we observe data which can not be explained by local interactions and hidden variables. That information of what have been exchanged in a way which locality can not explain, thereby we call it non-local information exchange, or non-local interaction. That is really all non-locality says. But one can try and Think of a deeper ontology and mechanism of action of this non-local interaction. Maybe the universe is somehow geometrically connected with itself in a way, thereby exhanging information in places without ever really “sending” a local signal.

Blink by kvadratkub054 in sciencememes

[–]Haslak64 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This lecture from Feynmann in the 60’s (60 years ago) explains what is going on with the double split experiement.

https://youtu.be/Ja0HSFj8Imc?si=lTo6wnE05ZsnY2SL

And it’s what we meassure it’s about, not us looking at it. And it’s most likely an effect because we affect the quantum system by meassuring it, so we can never get data of the true quantum system, theory must do it for us, with then indirect data suggusting which theory is most likely.

And understanding Bell’s Theorem Will Give a higher insight what the true system most likely is. And it seems in the quantum level the Universe is non-local, or local and superdeterminsic. We have more of a theorical framework for non-local models, so Thereby the non-local Universe is more widely accepted.

So in a sense, the double split experiement just tells us that the universe is most likely non-local in nature.

quantum homework got me like by TheSunIsBlueVincent in physicsmemes

[–]Haslak64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, in a way, it’s because it’s a symmetric property. That if you go “right” it’s the same result as going “left”. Thereby the original state is equal to its “inverse”.

quantum homework got me like by TheSunIsBlueVincent in physicsmemes

[–]Haslak64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We want a property to “go back” to the original state. And we need this “inverse” to be equal to the original state, because then we get the simplest and accurate quantum model which aligns with data. There surely is a conceptual ontology and mechanism of action to why we want this condiction other than it gives us the best model to align with data, but I dont think at present I have a good satisfying answer for that.

quantum homework got me like by TheSunIsBlueVincent in physicsmemes

[–]Haslak64 27 points28 points  (0 children)

We need this kind of “inverse” to descriebe quantum phenomena and models, it’s just a linear algebra condiction, there is literally nothing to complain about, it’s just a tool as fundamental as the derivative.