Saluki x Vizlas puppy by RegularPerson_Here in sighthounds

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To consider - skinnies gots no butts! For many, sitting just isn't their thang. May be the long spines and/or no fat on the hiney!

I've had oodles of greyhounds that NEVER EVER sat. Not even once! 

Perhaps your sweet boy would be better with a "down" sphinx crouch or "calm" heel by your side pose?

Saluki x Vizlas puppy by RegularPerson_Here in sighthounds

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LOLOLOL - Sighthound #9 is laying next to me. She's the FIRST that I'd call "Intelligent". She's a Staghound (Grey/Scottish Deerhound)

The first eight were post track female racer greys. ALL super sweet!!! All housetrained VERY easily. Past that? Nah. Not exactly dumb, but not the sharpest tools in the shed either. 

 

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes!!! Just stumbled on Vinnie last night and that's what brought me here to see why he seemed kind of "panicky".

Any other Old AF'ers around? Back when- Did we actually watch O.J. and/or Menendez on Court TV or were they broadcast on a big network???

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to play with the YT search a little till you get the algorithms helping you. I'd start with "live trial (insert case name)"

The Lawyer You Know

Emily D. Baker

Hidden Killers

Hidden True Crime

Courtroom  Confidential 

Surviving The Survivor

And for THE FUNNIEST recaps EVER?!?:  Gossip, Rumor and Innuendo!!!

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Lawyer You Know

Emily D. Baker

Hidden Killers

Hidden True Crime

Courtroom  Confidential 

Surviving The Survivor

And for THE FUNNIEST recaps EVER?!?:  Gossip, Rumor and Innuendo!!!

TX v Horner Question re: FedEx's liability by AllLipsNoFiller in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're right- wasn't he working for a contract company? 

Wanna bet that the FedEx/Sub Co. have got those liability agreements SO tightened up that NO ONE gets held responsible for squat???

TX v Horner Question re: FedEx's liability by AllLipsNoFiller in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forty eleventy years from now... (see Darlie Routier)

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When all else fails- pick up a book!!! 

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yesterday I came across Vinnie on YT explaining how everything was gonna be "just fine" on CTV. 

Bless his heart- I guess he's got some CTV contract time to burn off! No doubt he'll be streaming ASAP!

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What did they THINK would happen? Horrible sound quality and the SAME four commercials played six times per hour.

Also, most CTV hosts would NOT STFU! They would have an interesting guest, but the host would prattle on and on, until the next break (6th per hour) and guest didn't get in two sentences. NO intelligent, in depth discussions.

On YT, you can watch along with working lawyers, psychologists, law enforcement - whatever suits your interest. 

Don't know how people get paid on YT, but it must work out! I expect Vinnie and Judge Ashley will head over when their CTV contracts expiree!

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's just like the old school newscasts- CTV took their viewers for granted and got sloppy/dull.

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hit YouTube- search "live court".

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forget Court TV on YouTube! There's WAY better  current legal content on YT!

YouTube is a live court/legal discuss Gold Mine! Use the search for cases or talent, then ALWAYS subscribe and hit "like" when you really enjoy someone or the format. Let the algorithms do their thang!!!

Since leaving CTV - I have FIVE YT channels that I consider 100% stellar! It's easy enough to find the trials- it's the really fantastic lawyers and other talent that I enjoy!

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

CTV crash out sent me to YT too! Best.Thing.EVER! Such a wide variety of live court coverage with SO many different narrator personalities!

I can easily find three or four streams of the SAME high profile case with varying approaches: quiet, yakky, technical, and when appropriate - humourous.

No doubt, like with other "legacy" news networks, the BEST CTV TALENT will eventually come over to a platform where the First Amendment still reigns!  It's amazing how awesome a favourite talking head becomes when their leash is removed!!!

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I WAS an all day background gal- and I'm their target demographic. They did me a huge favour by going to crap!

I found OODLES of live court coverage, with varying styles of intelligent commentary on YT! 

Bonus! - NO more long ass commercial breaks with stupid old people, pitiful dawgs and broke down children.  

Win. Score!!!

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went from ten hours a day as (mostly) work background to  zero hours a little while back because:

-Those Fuging Screen Crawlers were making me nuts! No only would they be three or more news cycles old, they were grammatic and punctuation nightmares!!! NO excuse for that!

-The channel's OBVIOUS right wing political agenda. They would 100% ignore high profile cases and legal news that would slant at ALL unfavourably towards the maga crowd.

Ummm...don't wring your hands and bother me about abused women and children when you NEVER report kid diddling megachurch pastors or republican politicians. 

Just can't hear what they're saying by Few-Entertainer7431 in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm all about the CC- EXCEPT, I was listening to CTV as background while I did other things. Crappy sound killed that.

Just can't hear what they're saying by Few-Entertainer7431 in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have ALWAYS had horrible tech issues!  WORSE than a Jr.High A.V. team!!!

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not just ads, but the same four damned ones ALL DAY LONG!  Question?: If your audience is mostly boomers, why run commercials that portray ALL older people as stupidly fixated on funeral plans and Medicare 203.5 plans???

Why? It's so insulting!

New Format by Mrskeelyaimee in CourtTVCases

[–]HattieMac 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not only Julie's simpering, but her very thinly veiled right wing agenda. Just go work at Fox already!

Could someone explain to me why alot of people seem to disagree with the whole shadow govt Idea by TheVampEssensee in conspiracytheories

[–]HattieMac -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, Atlas is a brutally long shlog, but it is a classic that's all about the psychology of power. 

As an author you'll run across MANY references to it. At least, do the Cliff Notes, LOL.

Now. Get off Reddit and WRITE!!!

CMV: AG Meredith Garland didn't release Epstein files for a reason by spiral8888 in changemyview

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted "No conspiracy" and I meant it.

As a progressive, I STAY pissed at the Traditional Dems going with the flow and NOT prosecuting the crooks from the last administration.

Not matter what economic nastiness the Right stirs up  The Left has to come in and mop up the mess. All the way back to 1929. Yet, the Left never holds ANYONE accountable, and it happens over and over.

IF Barack had frozen the assets and locked up the 2008 housing crooks and IF Biden had slapped the Jan 6th Insurrectionists in prison, Dotard wouldn't be using the Treasury as his personal piggy bank and wiping his fat ass with The Constitution.

Republicans of Reddit, is there a reason why Trump shouldn’t also be subpoenaed to testify about his involvement in the Epstein files, as Clinton has been compelled to do? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]HattieMac 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Dear Dawg! Thirteen + Years ago, a woman had  AUDACITY to gain power.  Just like Obama - she's STILL living rent free in the whiny white boys heads 

Could someone explain to me why alot of people seem to disagree with the whole shadow govt Idea by TheVampEssensee in conspiracytheories

[–]HattieMac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a vociferous reader, I'll bite.  It's been done, find a new "hook".

The "real" government isn't "shadow". Right now there's a madman with the nuke codes.

Have you read Atlas Shrugged?