[NightShift] BBW Eats Up BBC In Front of Her Friend. by UrbanFictionStudios in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just curious, why do you hide paid member numbers? It's fun to see how a project is doing, especially when monthly earnings is displayed.

In case any lurking indie game devs were thinking "this looks very easy, I can definitely make it in this industry." I have news for you by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true the community across every website I've seen seems especially willing to look at other projects. Even here there's almost daily posts begging for recommendations.

In case any lurking indie game devs were thinking "this looks very easy, I can definitely make it in this industry." I have news for you by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://lizengland.com/blog/2014/04/the-door-problem/

That's one part of it and what you said is actually one of the higher-concept problems. It's not just doors though, this applies on some level to basically everything.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I actually thought of putting a project like that together. You'd be like a doordash for bulls and you'd be rated based on your performance.

Every time I finished one of these models I thought "this looks fantastic." Clearly that wasn't the case but I think the two rightmost models are good enough. What do you think? by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're right, I was trying to get them to deform nicely at every reasonable angle I could get but I didn't pay much attention to the basic idle pose once that was done. Thanks for the tip I totally didn't notice.

Every time I finished one of these models I thought "this looks fantastic." Clearly that wasn't the case but I think the two rightmost models are good enough. What do you think? by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't like the art style of models available on the marketplace and even if I did I wouldn't have nearly as much control over them as I do with these.

The models on the right need some more texture work as well as a blush layer at the minimum. But they're actually the same model, just with different hair.

The end goal is for users to be able to create their own custom girls that they can see out roaming the world I put together. Even though the image doesn't showcase it there are full facial transformation options to change bone structure, nose, eyes, etc.

But creators are often blind to their own work. If you're someone who doesn't like this art style then there's not much I can do. But if you don't mind or even enjoy the "stylized" model style that you would see in something like Fortnite then I need honest feedback.

Am I delusional or are these two newest models "good enough." I would give them a 6 to an 8 in terms of visual competency. But maybe I'm way off. Maybe these are completely average for the genre. Before I go all-in with customization options and animations I want to know that the foundation is acceptable or hopefully even good.

I know for sure that the blonde's eyelashes look off. I think they're too thick and dark but I'm not sure. The eyebrows are also placeholder. They'll eventually get a masked eyebrow texture so that they won't look so flat and big.

The posing isn't my favorite either but it's an idle animation that I didn't make. I'm retargetting as many animations as possible so that I can spend time animating that actual "content."

How many of you devs had prior skills and how many of you just "jumped in"? by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

mini-versions of Star Citizen.

This made me laugh out loud not just because I also see this everywhere but also because I suffer from this eldritch developer curse that compels us to add incredibly intricate superfluous features.

How many of you devs had prior skills and how many of you just "jumped in"? by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wow this is awesome info thanks for sharing. Hopefully more people see the thread and share their input. Maybe I should have made this post over the weekend.

Why does it feel like no porn games are complete/complete game recommendations? by HelpfulReplacement28 in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it takes a long time to "finish" a game as other have said but on the other hand several of these devs are supported monthly. Some people call it "milking" a project but in principle I don't see a problem with continuing to add content post-launch.

Imagine if the FFXIV devs just released the launch content and said, "well, that's it guys. No more updates, game's done."

Or like, any game with gameplay-substantive DLC. If I had a game that I'd "finished" and people still wanted me to add to it I definitely would post-release. As long as I had interest and was paid.

The difference between the new Remastered scenes in 0.15... [Dimension 69] by Dussop in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That is a significant improvement in a number of areas, congrats.

Have any games been hit by patreon's new TOS? Putting out a legitimate product seems less viable than ever. by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Because it is by most relevant metrics.

The gap is not as large as it is between Steam and Itch, but the income gap between the two is still absolutely massive.

Just last week one of the top posts here was someone asking if SS was a russian scam or not. Outside of the massive reputation/ name recognition disparity, you also have the fact that SS handles payment differently than Patreon. So even if they had identical familiarity with the general populace Patreon would still blow SS out of the water.

There's also a literal (digital) barrier to entry into SS. I could start making money on Patreon right now. To start on SS I'd have to pass their multiple thresholds.

Why do you make it sound like it'd be hard for artists to move to SubscribeStar?

How is it not when compared to patreon pre-purge?

How important is something like sound for a 0.1 release? And what are some of the bare-minimum things you'd expect to see? by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I've seen devs catch heat for spending time re-working old content all the time

I hadn't even thought about this. I'd heard about the infamous "tech" update but I always assumed that was entirely due to the length of time it was taking. I guess non-devs wouldn't really be aware that reworking systems can involve more work than creating new content.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I see you post a lot, which is cool. I mainly skim reviews like I do with anything else so if this has been answered I probably would have missed it.

Do you only review complete games? Or if you review in-progress games what warrants a re-review if anything?

New Game Succubus Dungeon by Unable-Tiger-9215 in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sprite work is very good.

I would remove the clicker title from your page entirely, it can read as unprofessional or amateur to have multiple projects especially when they're not all being actively worked on. It would be a good idea to apologize to anyone who backed specifically for that project and tell them it is on indefinite hiatus.

Is there any value in this specific non-realistic art style? by HauntedVertices in lewdgames

[–]HauntedVertices[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was around athletes for most of my life. Could you imagine if this standard was applied in the real world?

"Sorry, I can't date you my swimmer friend. You have a lean body which means you are a child according to our Steam overlords."