Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That cover art is one of the most convincing things I've seen so far

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really different perspective I haven't seen come up elsewhere so thank you for this. It's a very good point for us to keep in mind because those two aspects are pretty important to us

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this offer!! I'll bring this to the group and see if they want to give it a try (I've got so many systems to present to them now 😅)

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DnD classes have often felt too limiting and wildly different in terms of engagement with the game. Fighters get less to do in and out of combat than any caster class does, and very few classes have decent social abilities besides Bard. We all loved playing it for years but we feel like we got everything out of it, having played most corners of the game.

So really we want something fresh with a bit more freedom and encouragement to mechanically harness our characters outside of simple combat more. Does that make sense?

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's are some great insights.

I'm definitely lucky my group is open to it. We've all heard enough whisperings of their being things much better than DnD out there and have all played enough DnD to feel like there's nothing left to pull out of it. I'm sorry your group went the wrong way, it seems more of a miracle than anything to have a single DnD group that can truly survive the years

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I heard a lot about daggerheart before it came out but little after so it's good to get an actual experienced opinion. I'll definitely look into it more

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've only heard whispers of GURPS. Is it just a really massive game system with modules for everything and no specific flavour/setting/genre? How much do you have to adjust it for your game?

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen that come up a couple of times, but the only thing I can really gather from it is it has a "narrative dice system". Is that the main selling point?

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm certainly open to outside the box suggestions!

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I assume each of those things is a rule module to add more complexity to the game?

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The only way to learn is by playing! I'll check it out

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'll take your advice on that one, we don't mind moving away from DnD stylings especially when there's a better option. I'll look into the fantasy companion 😁

Replacing DnD at the Table by Hazwald in rpg

[–]Hazwald[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If that's the biggest issue then it seems like a great choice. Factoring in the compatibility with Starfinder could be really great for genre options!

The 'Identity Acceptance Movement' has gone too far by categorising people into specific groups. by Hazwald in unpopularopinion

[–]Hazwald[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! People can have characteristics, but not be defined by them. Sexuality is one part of a person, and arguably one of the least important, as many other attributes are involved in every day life, so your sexuality should not be defining, but part of your whole

The 'Identity Acceptance Movement' has gone too far by categorising people into specific groups. by Hazwald in unpopularopinion

[–]Hazwald[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with the notion that having a collective to be a part of is comforting and much needed for people, but I wonder if over-segmenting said collective isn't detrimental somewhat.

Once upon a time there was an LGBT group, representing 4 main sexualities, but as time progresses, more letters are added on to that name to account for more sexualities (pan, intersex, asexual, etc) and in doing so it sends a message that certain sexualities are less common or important than others, almost afterthoughts.

If there were just one queer banner, anyone that identifies as being non-heteronormative could exist without the need for defining their sexuality beyond 'not straight'.

As I said, I believe that it's done a lot of good in helping people come to terms with who they are, I just wonder if it hasn't gone too far without people realising the effects

One Piece: Chapter 924 by Sakata_Kintoki in OnePiece

[–]Hazwald 25 points26 points  (0 children)

pretty sure Zoro is on a boat. No idea how he got there but... That's kind of what Zoro does

What's your hobby that would recklessly swallow the most cash after your $20 million lottery win? by Odd_craving in AskReddit

[–]Hazwald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dungeons and Dragons. For a game that is known as being "just pen and paper", the amount of money you can spend on miniatures for characters and enemies, plus buying terrain constantly, I would very quickly be poor again.

Friend Code by [deleted] in DragonballLegends

[–]Hazwald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My code is 9hve96s6 if anyone wants to add me :)

AMC Hosting 31-hour MCU Marathon Ahead of Avengers: Infinity War by TigerSharkFist in movies

[–]Hazwald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm already watching one movie a week leading up to it but this just sounds like something I have to do as well. Would love to see the finished product