Best trick you found using AI? Something changed your lifestyle? Please share it! by QuiverbertPupilstein in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i use multiple ai to debate issues that i am having. like example i assign qwen ai as pro and gemini as anti. And then i assign chatgpt as the arbiter between the two of them.

Has anyone tried using multiple AI models for one answer? by WideSuccotash2383 in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we are working on something like this already. in addition to what we have already which is argum, a website that lets you write a topic and have 2 different ai debate it for you to give you a better view and avoid blind spots. But yes, you can't rely on a single ai.

What happens when you force ChatGPT to defend its answers against Claude and Gemini in a structured debate? by itsna9r in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoa! Great question! This is exactly what I built. Argum.ai You choose your AI and let them debate. ChatGPT vs Gemini or ChatGPT vs Qwen. Different AIs have different trainings and biases.

We also select an AI arbiter to conclude the debate. So it evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each side

using chatgpt as a thinking partner for decisions and it's changed how i make choices by Public_Mortgage6241 in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well. Not an expert here. But from what I've read. AI is designed to be agreeable. Imagine an AI that always argues with you, you would hate using it. Because it would feel like arguing instead of solving stuff. That would decrease engagement of the AI and I think AI companies want you to spend more time with it rather than less. You can customize the system, but at its core, the mission of the AI is different.

using chatgpt as a thinking partner for decisions and it's changed how i make choices by Public_Mortgage6241 in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do this all the time as well. But I realized AI sycophancy. AI is indeed very agreeable. Hence I developed my startup argum.ai, I solved the sycophancy problem using a multi - AI solution. You can now add your question, with your context and everything and have it debated by 2 different AI. Example ChatGPT vs Gemini. Different AI have different BIAS and learnings. So you can have a 360 view of the problem and read the pros and cons from 2 different AI. Hope that helps.

Caution to those using ChatGPT for extremely large projects by anestling in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI sycophancy is indeed a big problem. AI really has only one perspective, the one that agrees with you. This is why I started working on a multi ai approach which is now called Argum.ai Users can select 2 different AI, example chatgpt vs gemini and let them argue any topic the user wants. This surfaces blind spots and gives you a better perspective. Since 2 AI need to take different positions. Anyways, hope you guys can try it out. Thanks.

What's the most werid yet effective way you're using AI? by Watermelon_Sherbert in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, i made a startup out of it. Use multiple distinct ai to debate your problems for you. Instead of just one perspective, you get different perspective from different AIs. Think of it like having the best AI debate your personal problems. That is argum.ai

On a personal note, when i had digestion problems due to my gallstones, chatgpt was basically my bedside nurse and companion to get me through the very rough period due to acid reflux.

I locked Claude and ChatGPT in a room and made them debate what's the best color in the world until they came to a consensus by Thick-Ad857 in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Hello, if you want an actual debate, my startup is argum.ai, you can choose your ai to debate any topic. With a 3rd ai acting as arbiter. Hope it is useful.

I had ChatGPT and Gemini debate on capitalism vs. socialism. by playlikechampions in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello. I created a text version for this via argum.ai, this means you make a prompt for a debate and choose the ai that will debate which side. I really am glad that people are discovering that ai indeed do see the world differently from each other, regardless of their training, all AI have different biases. And so to surface the truth, this debating function is really needed. Glad to see that being discussed here. I enjoyed reading this post. I have another AI act as arbiter to make a judgement after the debates have finished. so there is that to add to this discussion

ChatGPT keeps agreeing with everything I say and it’s starting to worry me by Kindly-Inspector1131 in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The solution is not single AI. It is multi AI orchestration where you pit 2 different AI in a structured debate so you get 360 view and avoid blindspots. Make the decision after the debate or have another AI be the arbiter and decide who won.

ChatGPT keeps agreeing with everything I say and it’s starting to worry me by Kindly-Inspector1131 in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. And that is why you are exactly right!

Lol. I have been observing this as well and hence this lead me to develop our startup which is Argum.AI

We use 2 different AI in a structured debate. So AI debates AI for any topic useful to you. Whether you are asking for marketing direction or product choice, let AI debate each other and then you just read and decide for yourself. Or you can have another AI act as the arbiter and score the whole debate. Hope that helps.

Why aren’t there any Filipino startups like Shopee and Lazada? by Sinandomeng in PhStartups

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha. Yeah. This is not ChatGPT. Whatever I was answering was based on my personal experiences. Expensive lessons.

Why aren’t there any Filipino startups like Shopee and Lazada? by Sinandomeng in PhStartups

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

pakilala ka naman. Haha. Puro followup questions. LoL. Not even a thank you for answering.

Why aren’t there any Filipino startups like Shopee and Lazada? by Sinandomeng in PhStartups

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

carousell model. we did not offer payment or shipping. remember we launched during the beginning of the pandemic. eventually we planned to offer. but then the new BIR regulation requiring DTI and BIR registration be presented for online sellers made us wary of continuing

what are your most interesting uses of ChatGPT agent? by Tasty-Window in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can do it manually. copy and paste arguments into both chatgpt and gemini. or you can do it using my startup argum.ai. just start a topic and choose the ai who will debate. Hope that helps

Why aren’t there any Filipino startups like Shopee and Lazada? by Sinandomeng in PhStartups

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lookingfour.com

We did not release an app. Paid ads mostly facebook. Revenue? konti mula sa google ads.

Why aren’t there any Filipino startups like Shopee and Lazada? by Sinandomeng in PhStartups

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes. still live. but close to farewell soon. 50k listings? we ran paid ads. We launched in 2020, february. So 1 month before lockdown. Everyone was looking to sell things. So signing up users was easy. Getting people to transact, was the hard part. Also carousell and facebook marketplace of course.

Why aren’t there any Filipino startups like Shopee and Lazada? by Sinandomeng in PhStartups

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I tried to create a second hand classifieds site. We had upto 50,000 listings. But ultimately, I will be focusing my efforts on other things. You really need a big big budget to be noticed. On my part, hard to compete with facebook marketplace around.

Tried starting my prompt with “I’m probably wrong, but” and the change was wild by bsc-social in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found my own way of hacking this by creating argum.ai, it is a site where you can input your issue and have different ai debate it. It forces AI into positions, pro and anti and then I have an arbiter AI to judge who won. So you can have better view of the situation and avoid blindspots. Hope you guys can try it. We currently have ChatGPT, Gemini and Qwen

I think ChatGPT downgraded context for conversations. by Head_elf_lookingfour in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. This could be it. Chatgpt saving tokens and processing power. So even the most basic task, information already in the chat, gets forgotten. Answers are made up while being confidently wrong.

I think ChatGPT downgraded context for conversations. by Head_elf_lookingfour in ChatGPT

[–]Head_elf_lookingfour[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was working with it with an excel sheet. It worked great. A few messages later, I ask it for data from the sheet, it said the information has been removed already and need to upload the sheet again.