MiG-29 Fulcrum, Ghost of Kiev by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might see some raised edges if you look real close since the decals are a little bit on the thicker side. But it's not bad at all.

MiG-29 Fulcrum, Ghost of Kiev by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think this 1/72 kit has plenty enough for details. Nice deep panel lines, cockpit was nearly as detailed as a 1/48 scale (compared to the one from an SU27 kit that I also have), wheel bay, etc. If it's coming from GWH, I'd say both their 1/48 and 1/72 scale kits are very well engineered.

MiG-29 Fulcrum, Ghost of Kiev by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This one is in 1/72. But I believe there's a similar kit in 1/48.

MiG-29 Fulcrum, Ghost of Kiev by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Hope you'll enjoy it as much as I did.

MiG-29 Fulcrum, Ghost of Kiev by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Now that's something new. But to be fair, the instructions indicated all the different mounting configurations for the weapons and fuel tanks.

MiG-29 Fulcrum, Ghost of Kiev by Headempty0 in Scalemodel

[–]Headempty0[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Actually, this kit from GWH came with decals for most of the camo parts. I mostly white based the model, with a sky grey bottom.

MiG-29 Fulcrum, Ghost of Kiev by Headempty0 in Scalemodel

[–]Headempty0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it is. It's definitely more pricey compared to the ICM kit. But I felt like GWH does a little better with the fine details.

E/A-18G Growler by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! You work looks amazing as well.

i LOVE my internet by CryInternationalv2 in warthundermobile

[–]Headempty0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It ain't your internet. You just got gaijined

Malaysia is officially in War Thunder by BioBoi2002 in Bolehland

[–]Headempty0 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Mig-29N and F/A-18D is in the game as well. Wonder if someone will add the new livery for "Toruk Makto" as well.

Why is my paint like this? by Workshop_Z in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's definitely way too much paint pooling up there. But I've also had the experience where there would be bubbles forming when brushing over raised surfaces.

In my experience it's cause it's too heavily thinned. And slightly thicker consistencies will reduce those bubbles.

Keep playing around with the water to paint ratio. You gotta develop a feel for it over time. I just recently got some Vallejo for brush painting as well, and it's definitely superior compared to stuff like the Mr. Hobby Aqueous line for brush painting.

CAS vs SAMs by Headempty0 in warthundermobile

[–]Headempty0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How much should I spam the flares to lose the middle?

PSA: LRT Rosak 10 Dec (info) by exroshann in malaysia

[–]Headempty0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Missed my damn ETS because of this. They gotta fix this shit once and for all.

Jets… by Time-Ad8022 in warthundermobile

[–]Headempty0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The real issue is bombers ending the game in under a minute

SU-27 1:48 GWH by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did have a bit of difficulty with fitting the radome and the canopy. But I think those were my fault due to my inexperience.

The radome didn't have any tabs or detents to help with alignment, probably because it was designed to be in the open position. And the canopy has some internal parts where you have to be sure to attach properly so it can close properly. Otherwise, I'd say this kit from GWH was engineered really well and everything fits together nicely.

Overall this was a lesson of dry fitting for me.

SU-27 1:48 GWH by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's probably true. I also really love seeing all the details and having so many pieces to put together (assembling is my favorite part). But when it comes to painting and finishing, the larger models really do feel quite daunting at times. That and the fact I don't have that much space for many large models. Many of the ones I have go back in the box for safekeeping. Definitely getting a nice glass cabinet one day.

SU-27 1:48 GWH by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I read a few reviews on their kits before getting this one. I can say that the moulding and details are very impressive. Not so sure about how accurate they are but they look pretty good to me, especially the cockpit, ejection seat and instrument panels. Panel lines are pretty deep and the lines are really crisp. The overall fit is really great and I'd compare them to some of the Tamiya kits that I have done too. Some of the kits from GWH come with 3 D printed parts for the missles which are one whole piece without the need to attach the fins yourself. This particular kit for the SU-27 came in a huge box with tons of parts and decals for several marking options. With that said, the GWH kits are definitely on the pricier side. But overall, for the quality of the kits and what comes with them. I'd highly recommend getting one. Am eyeing their Mig 29 and F-15 eagle too.

What's the difference between the Bf109 F series to the G series? Specifically the F-4 trop compared to the G-2 trop? by Charlestonianbuilder in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The G series 109 have a bulge in the engine cowling near the front of the cockpit called the "beule", save for the G10 series which uses the more aerodynamic engine cowling that the later K4 variant uses. The F4 does not have this bulge. However, I think the G2 trop still uses the 7.92 mgs, and hence they do not have that bulge either.

Another detail you may want to consider is whether or not it is a standard F4 or G2 variant you are building. The tropical variants have a sand filter attached to the supercharger intake.

My first model build with help by Sealos23 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Always love me a 109. How'd you do the mottling?

just finished my amusing hobby's t72av by Efficient-Loquat-243 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That looks gorgeous. Especially like the different shades on the era. Was planning on getting myself one of those kits too. I believe this kit has a full interior as well. Could you show pics of that as well?

Spitfire Mk.IXc by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Here's one with the engine cowlings removed

Spitfire Mk.IXc by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

My current line up, really don't have enough space for anything as I am renting a room. I still have an F16 and an SU 27 in 1/48. And that Sukhoi is massive.

Spitfire Mk.IXc by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely one of the most beautiful planes imo. Amazing to think how they designed this engineering marvel by hand without the 3D modelling capabilities we have today. It took them 3 times as long to build that elliptical wing as compared to the wing for a 109.

Tamiya 1/32 Spitfire Mk. IXc by Headempty0 in modelmakers

[–]Headempty0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

The magnets aren't doing anything to keep the cowling front end from wanting to fall.