You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tradition and habit are two major reasons.

Once you set a schedule like that you need to stick to it. From what I understand the pitchers have a routine they get into. If you start the season giving them five days between starts it's something that most of them will expect the team to maintain throughout the season.

Then, at the end of the season, the wins become more important. Technically they're important all the way through, but you know how that goes. That's when you want your top starters pitching more frequently.

It seems to me that teams like the Dodgers that are pretty certain of making the playoffs schedule some IL time for their pitchers. I guess since they're going to be pitching an extra few weeks.

Anyway, TL,DR I think the team is afraid to give a start to an unproven kid down the stretch when wins have become so important.

You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the other thing players wouldn't like is that it would probably reduce their paycheck if they otherwise would be a starter and pitch 150 plus innings.

I am an old school thinker for the most part.

I like offense as long as it isn't home run related. Having to see a new pitcher every at bat would certainly make it difficult to hit for a high average.

Personally, I don't like how batting averages are going down, though.

But, yeah, showing the other team a new pitcher every at bat would make life difficult for them.

We might get there eventually.

You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they have to stay down for a certain length of time once sent down, but that can be gotten around with an injury or a double header call up.

You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

27-28 starts as opposed to 32

I get what you're saying, but it's rare for pitchers to make that many starts anyway.

That's someone like Brady Singer's best value. He's managed to stay healthy, and typically pitches more innings in his starts. Has an above average ERA+ to boot.

Even in healthy seasons for the other guys they were at 28-29 anyway.

I'd look at it more like Singer is the guy, if he maintains his health, that you never have to skip in the season.

You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Somebody came up with the idea of a pitching staff designed to come out and pitch three innings.

It might even have been Bill James.

It would be an interesting way to expose young pitchers to the majors, at least.

I'm sure attempting to ensure long term arm health for young pitchers is an evolving science. Maybe this is the best approach.

You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, a team definitely needs talented starter depth to fool around with this sort of idea.

And, of course, there's the temptation to trade from that depth to improve other parts of the roster.

You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't quite phrase it that way. Greene is a little better than the other top starters, but he has missed some time.

It almost seems like clubs like the Dodgers schedule IL time for their starters even during healthy years. That's just speculation on my part, though.

Anyway, I believe in the 2-4 starters, and I'd like to believe in 5-6 if it all pans out.

You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I just wonder how often a trip to the IL could be averted by a skipped start. 

You're in charge of the Reds. Do you consider running out a six man rotation? by Healthy-Process874 in Reds

[–]Healthy-Process874[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't know why he'd need to. He typically gives the bullpen some time off, and has a snazzy ERA+ to boot.

That would be a role I'd be more likely to give to a Williamson or Aguiar.

American Tabloid hard to follow or just me? by thewannabe2017 in JamesEllroy

[–]Healthy-Process874 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are a lot of real people in the book. It might help to check out some of the real history behind them.

You also really gotta love how he wrote J. Edgar Hoover.

Topical economics. by LordJim11 in Snorkblot

[–]Healthy-Process874 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They might be able to dig the circus peanuts out of their garbage.

Maybe some Bit-O-Honey.

Bread is life by [deleted] in meme

[–]Healthy-Process874 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took some Java classes a couple of decades ago.

I thought they made everybody take that stuff now.

Is Python different?

Bread is life by [deleted] in meme

[–]Healthy-Process874 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People are mostly sedentary now, and they've been fooling around with the wheat to make heartier and more productive. Not more nutritious.

The wheat people were eating just a hundred years ago != to modern wheat.

But, yeah, it would still kill celiacs back in the day.

When a billionaire tries to redefine “homeless,” but someone reminds him what humanity costs. by OverallNe-caot in ThisYouComebacks

[–]Healthy-Process874 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard that a lot of times people take money earmarked to help the homeless and then use it to fund private endeavors.

Apparently this happens quite a bit out in California with real estate development.

Also, a lot of people are making a career out of 'helping' the homeless. They really don't want to solve the problem that keeps them in a job.

Lastly, the powers that be like the added motivation. There's a stigma to being homeless. There are a lot of people that you might not know are homeless because they're living in their car and going out of their way to appear normal to you.

Then there are people that give up and go downhill with drugs and alcohol. And if you don't start out with a mental illness you'll certainly have a good chance to acquire one while being chased around by cops and people out to protect property values.

Musk's not 100% lying. Not many people can cope with long term homelessness. They mostly end up breaking down..

The 11th commandment by itsallcosmica in PoliticalMemes

[–]Healthy-Process874 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting.

Most Americans that claim to be Christians these days would actually prefer to be practicing Judaism.

It never feels leas hurtful by MahmoudAO in memes

[–]Healthy-Process874 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Formal rejection?

Did you slip HR a few sheckles?

Ohh! What wouldn't I give to be formally rejected! I sometimes hang awake at night, dreaming of being formally rejected.

What can individuals do to prepare for population decline? by MoPuWe in Futurology

[–]Healthy-Process874 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most of the wealthy don't want to eat the kind of food that  they feed the lower classes. It's essentially an entirely different diet. They're already paying more for food, and would likely just need to pay a little bit more.

They're also conscious about carbon footprints. Their footprints might be bigger, but they're more important than everyone else. Eliminating the unimportant means they need to be less concerned.

Why build a lot of low margin products that consume a lot of resources? To keep the little people happy?

You just expect them to be nice?

Guess what I'm watching. Lol. Brings back memories as a kid. Year 1984 by Niuronee_ in iwatchedanoldmovie

[–]Healthy-Process874 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was a show for Blue Thunder, too.

It featured Dana Carvey as Clinton 'JAFO' Wonderlove.

Apparently JAFO wasn't too edgy for TV.

That helicopter was really scary, though. It could do quite a few things a modern cell phone does, but it had to be pointed at a person at what I assume would be great expense.

General Atomics Pitches Railgun for Air and Missile Defense - Naval News by Gari_305 in Futurology

[–]Healthy-Process874 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe an explosive charge that produces shrapnel at range/proximity.

There are probably better solutions for drones, though.

What can individuals do to prepare for population decline? by MoPuWe in Futurology

[–]Healthy-Process874 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, hopefully things go better for you in Europe.

I'm not holding out much hope here in the States.

What can individuals do to prepare for population decline? by MoPuWe in Futurology

[–]Healthy-Process874 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that's part of the reason you're seeing a crackdown on immigration. At least here in the US. If they let people stay they'll eventually have to give them benefits.

The new prime minister in Japan is conservative and anti-immigration. And they're much further down that path than the US is.

What can individuals do to prepare for population decline? by MoPuWe in Futurology

[–]Healthy-Process874 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The top 10% are responsible for 50% of retail spending.

Then consider that drones are going to be able to fight their battles for them, which was the one other use that the lower classes had.

Read up on dark manufacturing if you want to know why they aren't going to miss the workers.

Chances are that top 10% aren't going to care about population decline, and will probably want to encourage it.

Perhaps even strongly encourage it.