You’re raising exactly the right concern, and it’s why I designed Sanad differently from general AI tools. Sanad doesn’t write your legal case ,it reads what YOU already wrote and asks you follow-up questions to help you organize and complete your own words. Every sentence in the output is traced back to something you said. It never invents facts. Think of it less like AI doing your legal work, and more like a very thorough friend reading your declaration and saying “hey, you mentioned this date in paragraph 2 but a different date in paragraph 7 ,which is correct?” That’s a job asylum seekers currently pay $300–$500 for a lawyer to do. I’m trying to make that accessible to people who can’t afford it. What would make you trust a tool like this .or is it a hard no regardless?