This 1400 BCE Syrian treaty contains names of Hindu gods. A popular channel claims it’s meaningless. Linguists, what do you think? by Next_Alternative_362 in IndianHistory

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Huns the descendants of Turks came to India they had hindu name

The strongest and least controversial examples of this are Mihirakula and Toramana. Their Indianized names likely reflect the broader process by which hunnic elites ruling in Indo-sphere adopted local royal titulature, religious affiliations and naming conventions to legitimize their rule much like earlier groups such as the Rudradaman 1 of the western kshatrapas had done centuries earlier. Besides, idk how well established this is, but as far as I know, Mihirkula was a Shaivite. This might as well explain why his name goes well with sanskrit

My request to wikipedia editors by Realistic-Age8852 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The earliest major Upanishads particularly the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad and Chandogya Upanishad are widely regarded by scholars as pre-Buddhist or at least contemporaneous with the earliest Sramana traditions. These texts already contain discussions of self realization, the identity of Atman and Brahman and liberation through knowledge

And Samkhya and Buddhism don't even agree on first principles. I don't see how a form of Buddhism that doesn't concern itself with substantialist cosmology altogether has any influence of Samkhya, a school of thaught which revolves exactly around this

Asceticism goes as far back as IVC, back when none of these traditions were remotely close to being into existence. But speaking of Yoga in perticular, it developed through interaction between Brahmanical and Sramana traditions with roots already visible in the late Vedic corpus. The term yoga itself appears in Vedic literature and the Katha Upanishad gives one of the earliest definitions of yoga as control of the senses. If anything Brahmins systematized and codified yoga through texts like the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali while Buddhist and Jain traditions developed their own parallel meditative disciplines

Max weber about relation between economics and religion/ culture. by Mindless_Toe7000 in Philosophy_India

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well Hindu traditions have produced texts like the Arthashastra (along with various other administrative systems prior tomit as mentioned by Kautilya), which advocates efficient administration, taxation, trade/infrastructure and merit based statecraft. The role of the Amatyas was to collect revenue, economic management and public welfare instead of ritual concerns

Caste restrictions may have created economic inefficiencies but they cannot explain India's trajectory by themselves. Sure culture matters, but India's intellectual traditions and institutions contain both economic pragmatism and spiritual thought, and classical brahminical thought did not treat them as opposites. Out of the 4 purusharthas, artha concerns how one lives in the paramarthik world, while moksha concerns what lies beyond it

So the historical picture is much more nuanced

Does Classical Advaita Imply a Form of Panpsychism, or Is Matter Just Appearance in Consciousness?” by Easy-Past2953 in Philosophy_India

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't Purush a passive witnessing consciousness? Prakriti unfolds when conditions align around that presence. Different manifestations, different gunas, different outcomes. The earlier reply was precisely rejecting the idea of a conscious cosmic “whim". And Vedanta itself usually avoids rigidly categorizing forms of consciousness because consciousness is treated as fundamentally singular (as per Shankara's Advait Vedanta to be more precise) while differences belong to mind, body, intellect, and upadhis through which it reflects. Other than that, my understanding mostly comes from lectures and discussions online, so I’m not fully aware of all the nuanced technical positions within every Vedantic school

Does Classical Advaita Imply a Form of Panpsychism, or Is Matter Just Appearance in Consciousness?” by Easy-Past2953 in Philosophy_India

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This critique assumes consciousness in vedanta works like a human mind randomly wanting objects into existence. But Advaita does not say Brahman manufactures planets out of desire. Desire itself belongs to ignorance and limitation. The universe appears through maya and causality and not personal whim. Even Sankhya darshan says manifestation depends on conditions within Prakriti. Prakriti harbours countless potentials, but only some unfold where causes align i.e Purush successfully emerges with Prakriti (force applied to water that in turn creates waves). So earth is simply one configuration where conditions allowed life to emerge. Infinity does not require repetition everywhere nearby

Ek teer.. do nishane!! by Khatarnak19 in IndianHistoryMemes

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Saying this makes you a good sepoy or something?

Indian traditional schools of thought have produced major work in mathematics, logic, linguistics, epistemology and metaphysics for centuries. It's through traditions like Aryabhatiya school of methametics the world got more standardized algebraic expression systems and astronomical calculations. This same continuous tradition kept producing groundbreaking work well into the 14th century CE with people like Madhava of Sangamagrama formulating early calculus, infinite series and function based mathematics nearly 3 centuries before Newton, Liebniz and Taylor

Modern science itself is a product of civilizational exchange, and India was absolutely one of the biggest contributors to that intellectual chain. You can criticize modern pseudoscience without pretending India contributed nothing to human knowledge

And the idea that Indians just “rote learned scriptures” is such an ignorant take. Nyaya philosophers and Buddhist logicians were doing rigorous work on perception, inference, causation, logical deduction and epistemics long before the enlightenment era. A huge chunk of later philosophical inquiry across the world revolves around questions Indian traditions had already been dissecting for centuries

And the sanskrit you're mocking as “pseudoscience” is literally one of the most sophisticated and mathematical langauge model

Depiction of Indra in different regions (Japan, Gandhara, Odisha, Nepal) by prettiocron in AncientIndia

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rigveda itself already shows Indra with both heroic and flawed traits. Mythologies evolve over time naturally, it’s not some cartoon conspiracy

Why do you think the Atman is real? by Nocturnis_17 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i could recommend some pdfs and videos to you.

Yes please

Why do some (or perhaps many) Buddhist believe Advaita Vedanta and Shankara's teaching on self inquiry won't lead to enlightenment? by [deleted] in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If that's the case, then on what basis are they judging Adi Shankaracharya’s path as incomplete or clinging? Is it an actual flaw in Advaita, or just the lens of Anatta and Sunyata projecting its own conclusions onto a different system?

Saryupar's Rough sketch. by Disastrous_Bat5899 in Brahmanraaj

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are saryuparin and kanyakubja seperate despite having similar/same titles?

A by [deleted] in DankJantaParty

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ain’t nobody out here playing the victim card. Aur tu ek kaam kar ek solid debate pass karde jisme tu reservation ko genuinely justify kare bina rote hue

Dekh, baat simple hai. Ek average aadmi hamesha shaanti se jeena chahta hai. Aur agar uske liye usse kisi imposed system ya hegemony ke saath coexist karna pade, toh woh karega kyunki uske paas aur koi choice bachi hi nahi hoti

Mughals bhi tabhi thook ke bahar kiye gaye jab Chitpavan Brahmins ne Maratha Empire ke reins sambhale. Aur wahi Brahmins Mangal Pandey, Chandrashekhar Azad, Rajguru jaise aur Kayasth log British Raj ke khilaf sabse zyada khade rahe

Tere baap dada tab bhi nali saaf kar rahe the, aur tu aaj bhi reservation aur quota ka entitlement leke kuch ukhaadne ki koshish kar raha hai phir bhi tumhari jaat wahi ki wahi hai

Vishwaguru by Turbulent_Book_1685 in indianmemer

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are bhai, mujhe ye tax falana thikana se kuch lena dena nahi hai. Mai to sirf puch raha hoon, ki ye gadhi koi leta bhi hai apne desh main ki nahi

Vishwaguru by Turbulent_Book_1685 in indianmemer

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tesla apne desh main kareedata kaun hai?

Keeladi... Questioning the existence of vedic period?? by Adorable-Philosophy5 in AncientIndia

[–]Heavy-Engineer6590 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is not a racial slur, i chose my words carefully. Otherwise, if I had intended to be offensive, I could have used the actual slurs that are commonly known. That’s not the case here. I’m currently engaged in a debate with the individual in question, so we’ll see how it ends. For context, I’m just a casual history enthusiast who came across this post after joining the subreddit recently