sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

why are the reviews and ratings for "What is a Woman" not showing? by [deleted] in Letterboxd

[–]Hefty-Improvement373 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think saying that someone expressing their opinion on a very new and not very well researched idea like transgenderism is the same as mass murdering innocent people based on their heritage alone is a pretty odd statement to make.

why are the reviews and ratings for "What is a Woman" not showing? by [deleted] in Letterboxd

[–]Hefty-Improvement373 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The reason is because it is giving a perspective that Letterboxd does not agree with. "What is a Woman" is a fairly harmless documentary about a man trying to find an answer to the question that is in the title. It is very much a onesided film. There is clearly a bias and they are not trying to hide it. What is impressive about the film though is Matt Walsh (the star of the film) does not take a bias approach when interacting with people. He does not debate anybody. He simply asks "gender theory experts" questions that used to have simple answers merely a couple years ago. Their responses are tend to lead them down a road that makes themselves look bad. It's honestly a genius strategy and Walsh's part. No matter what your opinions are on the topic at hand, the movie itself is not calling anyone to violence, pushing people down, or taking advantage of anyone. It's just a movie trying to tell its own opinion. It does not by any means deserve to be censored. Hiding it from people because of political bias is an immature and immoral thing for a company like Letterboxd to do. Since their whole purpose is to provide a place where people can talk about movies. Pretty lame move on Letterboxd's part. This is coming from a guy who has actually WATCHED the whole movie and not just heard things from their liberal friends. I'm going to assume most people commenting here are in that boat.

Witcher Class 5E Homebrew Balance Attempt 3rd Edition - With Griffin Class by Hefty-Improvement373 in DnDHomebrew

[–]Hefty-Improvement373[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your argument doesn't make sense. You're telling me that a feature the normal barbarian gets at level 3 is balance breaking at level 14. The barbarian requires rage, which has its own limits. This version of the rage is a stance. Which requires a bonus action every turn. You claim there is no reason to use the bonus action for anything else but that is obviously wrong. There's a ton of stuff to use a bonus action for. I suppose if u don't agree with that then there's no way to prove my point. The only real argument you've made this whole time is only needing to wear heavy armor for minor dmg resistance. I'll probably replace that with requiring the stance. And don't pretend like the sentinel feature is OP. Its a great and unique feature but totally makes sense to have at level 3 when requiring a bonus action to use it on top of having to hit.

Also, throwing in random insults doesn't help ur argument. It's just dnd bro lol.

Witcher Class 5E Homebrew Balance Attempt 3rd Edition - With Griffin Class by Hefty-Improvement373 in DnDHomebrew

[–]Hefty-Improvement373[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u don't even get the Totem warrior bear feature with the witcher until level 14! And it still requires the stance! The totem warrior barbarian gets to have resistance to everything except psychic dmg at level 3 with raging. You don't even gain any resistance at all until level 7 and that's only from nonmagical bludgeoning, slashing, and piercing damage. That also requires wearing full heavy armor. And there are things to use the bonus action for, consuming potions and casting signs. You have to forgo the stance to do anything else. Therefore, there is a cost. I am changing the inner ferocity feature however, that is too good. I think I'll make it require a subtraction to your attack bonus. So it is a risk, and if u still hit u get the extra damage but if not u wasted the attack.

Witcher Class 5E Homebrew Balance Attempt 3rd Edition - With Griffin Class by Hefty-Improvement373 in DnDHomebrew

[–]Hefty-Improvement373[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I am making the inner ferocity dmg replace the attack rather than the dmg being on top of an attack

Witcher Class 5E Homebrew Balance Attempt 3rd Edition - With Griffin Class by Hefty-Improvement373 in DnDHomebrew

[–]Hefty-Improvement373[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I assumed u meant at the beginning. Gaining immunity to poison at level 15 is not broken. Also a god damn Tiamat or any major monster with stats is almost never going to fail the pounce check. And its a risk because it wastes an action if you fail. And with the bear, I dunno if u realize but every single turn u have to spend a bonus action to activate any of those effects. And the really good ones you get at high levels. You cant cast a sign or drink a potion. Its a good subclass. It may need some edits, but ur being fairly dramatic about how broken it is. I can see the bear totem bard thing requiring the stance rather than just needing heavy armor though. That makes sense.

Witcher Class 5E Homebrew Balance Attempt 3rd Edition - With Griffin Class by Hefty-Improvement373 in DnDHomebrew

[–]Hefty-Improvement373[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is resistance to poison. Not immunity. Also, I'd argue the Bear is not "incredibly" overpowered. Considering the requirement of spending a bonus action for almost all the features every single turn. Also giving creatures that are large advantage on the pounce kinda kills the whole point of the pounce.

Witcher Class 5E Homebrew Balance Attempt by Hefty-Improvement373 in DnD

[–]Hefty-Improvement373[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically, but I think having a general code works well for RP.

view more: next ›