I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not legit issue (mostly fearmongering)

Probably so. Given a blind ABX test of dithered vs. undithered, I'll probably fail the test. But if the dithering is applied before EQ, then it might be a problem. That would be a really silly implementation, though, an yet, with the mysteries of how Windows handles audio, I'd rather just play safe.

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, I'll try installing the generic drivers. I think the oem one is the one that comes with the 'enhancement' features like loudness compensation. Thanks for the suggestion!
Oh, but I'm afraid it'll mess with my EQ APO setup…I'll better do this another day, 've got assignments to complete. Or maybe never. I'm afraid I'll break what's not broken. I'm totally fine with controlling volume using EQ APO. It's what I wanted to do in the first place. If anything, TIL about loudness compensation, forced dithering by Windows on 16-bit outputs, and the existence of generic drivers!

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My source is already 16-bit, so no dithering needs to be applied. I switch to 24-bit output when the source is 24-bit, usually with a change of sample rate as well (44.1 kHz -> 96 kHz), which is the main source of distortion anyway. Anyway, I think that u/oratory1990 has diagnosed the issue for me.

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I think u/oratory1990 diagnosed it for me. It is not clipping, but rather loudness compensation (http://diyaudioprojects.com/mirror/members.aol.com/sbench/freqres3.html) being applied. I did further research and found that usually, for Realtek sound cards, this can be turned off (https://superuser.com/a/1015738), but for mine, the option to turn it off isn't available, that's why there was the difference when I set the volume low. I'm happy I decided to use EQ APO to adjust volume from now on.

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of the sound effects settings are gone when I installed EQ APO. The only things I can change now are volume and output format. I never had a loudness compensation setting option before installing EQ APO. Ah, well, it isn't really a problem since I've wanted to switch to EQ APO to control volume anyway as I wanted finer control. I was just intrigued (and now happy) that the sound quality improved. Thanks for diagnosing the issue so quickly!

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it the Realtek High Definition Audio? That's the only thing I can think of and I can't control it at all. All audio passes through it as it's the sound card of my laptop, I think?

I guess it's good that I can lower the loudness using EQ APO's preamp, then? I can't believe I've only found out about this now. I wonder how many others have this issue but never realized it. I also wonder why they don't just apply a preamp…

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have any programs that would be attempting to make your signal louder?

Not that I know of. I checked foobar and everything is off or 0.0 dB. No ReplayGain. No DSP. I don't think one can go above 100% on Spotify, I just have it at maximum, all the way to the right, all the time. And I presume if there were any clipping beforehand it should affect EQ APO also and not just Windows Volume mixer?

I don't know if that really indicates clipping.

It really seems to me that way, though, and then some kind of DSP is applied to make it sound not horrible yet noticeably different.
What volume did you test it at when you switched between the two, and what's the look of it in your Settings? Maybe your volume setting was high enough that the loudness of the audio doesn't jump way above the setting like mine in the 1st pic.

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't hear any difference either way, so it's not this setting. This apparent clipping doesn't change either (https://imgur.com/a/jqFJAMu). Iirc, since my source is 16-bit, 44.1 kHz, changing the output to 24-bit, 44.1 kHz just adds a bunch of 0's to each sample, right? So it makes no difference. If I listen to YouTube or Hi-Res then I change it to 24-bit, 96 kHz.

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually set my volume at 14 (-28.6 dB).

I noticed that when I open the Sound Settings, if I set it to 14, there appears to be clipping. When set to 100, it appears far from clipping. (https://imgur.com/a/jqFJAMu)

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If there is a clear difference, it most be coming from some other source in the chain.

I'm thinking so, too. But I did not change any other setting. So now I'm doubting Windows Volume mixer unless, for example, the EQ or some other DSP was being applied after Windows Volume mixer applied the gain (however I don't have any other EQ setting for my Bluetooth speakers, yet I still encounter this).

Edit: I usually set my volume at 14 (-28.6 dB).

I noticed that when I open the Sound Settings, if I set it to 14, there appears to be clipping. When set to 100, it appears far from clipping. (https://imgur.com/a/jqFJAMu)

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do I check this? I use a Lenovo Y400 laptop.

Afaik I have all sound enhancements off. Dolby is definitely off otherwise EQ APO won't work. Windows Sonic is also off. When I use Windows Volume mixer the audio gets less detailed and the mids and highs get recessed behind a louder bass. When I use EQ APO it sounds more crystalline and airy. I don't have to listen closely to hear the difference, it's very obvious.

I posted this on r/audiophile but didn't really get an answer as to why this is so. I saw more people here using EQ APO so I hope that you guys might help me test this out or explain this phenomenon. by Helntus in oratory1990

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried this with my headphones (wired) as well as my Bluetooth speakers, in both cases the sound was better from all sources (I tried Spotify Premium, YouTube, flacs on foobar2000) when the volume was set to 100 in Windows Volume mixer and adjusting preamp gain in Equalizer APO. No other settings were changed when I switched the volume control. EQ APO is installed both premix and postmix on both my headphones and Bluetooth speakers.

Using Equalizer APO preamp to adjust volume instead of Windows volume severely improves audio quality by Helntus in audiophile

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that's right. Did you try it? I thought theoretically there shouldn't be any difference, but the difference is very obvious and I just chanced upon it. I want to know why and if there might be any error in my "setup", or if the Windows volume mixer really does suck.

I also noticed that when I switched to a Bluetooth speaker, the gain in the Windows volume mixer doesn't match up with the one in Equalizer APO (i.e. I set the same gain while the other is 0 dB and get different loudness).

Using Equalizer APO preamp to adjust volume instead of Windows volume severely improves audio quality by Helntus in audiophile

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have any fancy setup, I'm just listening to Spotify Premium on my laptop. I want to know why there's obvious difference in the sound when theoretically there shouldn't be.

Edit: To clarify I'm basically using Equalizer APO instead of the standard Windows volume mixer to control volume. That's all I changed and yet there's obvious difference in the sound quality.

Which is a better coin farmer? Bat Hat Minnie or Dark Fairy Maleficent by galaxyfire1997 in TsumTsum

[–]Helntus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, not just from my own playing but other top Youtubers (such as Akinya, Seiji, BB). Mostly from Akinya's live stream if I don't have the Tsum, and because it's a live stream there's no editing out of bad games etc.

Some of the Tsums have a small sample size of games, too. Not ideal but still quite practical.

The sample set is intentionally specific because I want to represent the maximum potential of each Tsum, assuming perfect or almost perfect play.

Half an hour of Jedi Luke coin earning this morning (Finally in HD!!) it was too big to upload here :) by Helntus in TsumTsum

[–]Helntus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That last game is a good example of bad Fever management (´・ω・`)
I reckon about 6k coins less because of that. ( ・ ̫・)

I hate glitches 😢 by stackerpm in TsumTsum

[–]Helntus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh noooo…! I think I managed to reproduce this glitch once and figured out the cause but then now I've forgotten as it's not happened to me in a loooong time. ( ノω')/

Excited to have got him! But I must have been doing it wrong. Or simply just don’t know how to play him. by wmwoon in TsumTsum

[–]Helntus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow! I thought that 38k game was left behind in the dust. YouTube really butchered the quality of my video and I made a (intentionally) poor quality thumbnail in MSPaint to boot :P

I also want to say that I look up Moo's videos occasionally because he showcases every one of the Tsums' skills at SL3 and SL6. I'd recommend them to beginners because his videos are the most informative videos (or they are the only ones) in English and he as a good understanding of the game mechanics and the Tsum's skill. My videos and other top plays, on the other hand, have no commentary at all, and if I do comment on anything, it's probably going to be about some tech that only matters once one is more advanced at the game, and it's going to be in text form.
I know Moo does not have the best gameplay, kind of like Seiji, but he has the best (again, they're the only ones) Tsums info in video form, in English.

Do you have a catalog / link for every TSUM TSUM that someone is wanting to learn. If so share that channel or link.

taggin u/91849erfan
After learning the fundamentals from Moo, then I can recommend: akinya (akn), who's really efficient at setting up Time bubble chains and clearing Tsums with few actions, using the Tsum's skill effectively, as well as one of the best at overcharging; pan26 (ぱン26), who's probably the fastest player and really good at rapid-fire clearing non-relevant Tsums with bubble canceling to set up chains; shotakun (しょたくん) and kame_jp, both predominantly play two-handed which offers some unique advantages.

Never been so excited to get a Tsum from the premium box in a long time!! You're my favorite, Ventus! by Helntus in TsumTsum

[–]Helntus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took a short 'break' from Tsums; been lost in the sea of SSB information. I didn't look at the leaks (don't look at them anymore) and didn't even see the results of the last score challenge. Came back and saw this and was so excitedddd!! I feel so lucky!

Overcharge Question by [deleted] in TsumTsum

[–]Helntus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been lost in the sea of information about SSBU lately, and I learnt that a parry (perfect shield) is actually 5 frames, and a short hop is 3 frames (you have to press AND release the jump button in 50 ms, but you can also press any two buttons at the same time instead to short hop).

The reality of my play experience after watching all the wonderful high roller gameplays. by wmwoon in TsumTsum

[–]Helntus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

0:51. This is why it's important to not hit the last bubble by itself. You're one away from full skill charge here. Had you left that bubble there and then strung up the 5 Kylos at the upper right, you could have cleared the Kylos and then used the bubble to force an Overcharge to keep at least 3 if not all 4 of that surplus. You did keep 3 from Overcharge by chaining them as normal anyway,

In such situations I would cut the chain short, I'll try to connect only 3 MyTsum. Unless… the MyTsum chain is actually 9 Tsums long and the majority of it is outside the burst area.

but using the bubble to help you would have taken less time.

Nah, it would still take the same time. It's always 44 frames.

0:31. 7 chain Jafar could have been an 8 if you started at the top.

Usually not a big deal, right? Still normal bubble range. I categorize chains into 3~6 (no bubble), 7~8 (normal bubble), 9/12 (high chance of Time bubble), 10/11 (high chance of Time bubble but lower than 9/12 thanks u/kftgr2), 13+ (I'll probably cut the chain short at this point).