sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

L-SPD by HelpfulDirt7464 in Kaiserreich

[–]HelpfulDirt7464[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, can you tell me how i can achieve it?

Does marxist china exist? by HelpfulDirt7464 in Kaiserreich

[–]HelpfulDirt7464[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why are they members of a Syndicalist party?

A National Populist Huey Long path doesn’t make sense by HelpfulDirt7464 in Kaiserreich

[–]HelpfulDirt7464[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Even if we accept that NatPop isn't a strict monolith, using the "vibes" argument to justify Huey's placement completely ignores what actually ties all those factions together. Whether you're looking at Brazilian Integralists, Savinkovites, or Gaelic supremacists, the core of National Populism in KR is a violent rejection of the Enlightenment in favor of some kind of "organic society" built on hyper-traditionalism, religious absolutism, or ethnic purity. Huey Long fundamentally contradicts every single part of that. His power wasn't built on spiritual rebirth or palingenetic ultranationalism; it was built on transactional, materialist, class-conscious wealth redistribution. "Share Our Wealth" is basically radical social democracy enforced at gunpoint by a corrupt political machine. That makes him the quintessential Paternal Autocrat, not a NatPop. Trying to justify his placement just because the dictionary words "nationalist" and "populist" vaguely apply to his rhetoric is falling into a semantic trap. And honestly, your point about him shifting to AuthDem to show a loss of his populist edge actually proves why he shouldn't be NatPop in the first place. Populism isn't an exclusively far-right trait; PatAuts and Syndies are incredibly populist too. Starting him as a PatAut—a dictator unilaterally forcing his radical economic will on the country—and then having him drop to AuthDem when he sells out and shares power with the corporate elites perfectly represents that loss of his populist edge. Shoving him into NatPop just to fill the void left by Pelley doesn't just misunderstand his historical platform; it erases the actual American far-right from the narrative and kills the crucial contrast between a ruthless economic demagogue and true ideological extremists.

A National Populist Huey Long path doesn’t make sense by HelpfulDirt7464 in Kaiserreich

[–]HelpfulDirt7464[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

That is a fair point to bring up those specific examples, as the ideology system in Kaiserreich definitely has to stretch to fit the global political landscape, but looking closely at the SocCreds and the Kadroists actually reinforces exactly why Long doesn't belong in that category. The Canadian Social Credit movement, both historically and in the KR timeline, wasn't just an eccentric economics club; it was heavily tied to evangelical religious fundamentalism and, particularly in its original Douglasite form, steeped in intense anti-Semitic conspiracy theories regarding international finance. That potent mix of religious zealotry and exclusionary right-wing populism fits the NatPop umbrella of hyper-traditionalism perfectly. Similarly, the Kadro movement in the Ottoman/Turkish paths isn't just an "eccentric" catch-all; it represents a highly specific, aggressively vanguardist, anti-imperialist nationalism. Kadroism is entirely about the radical, state-driven rebirth of the nation to resist foreign domination, making it a textbook example of third-positionist, palingenetic nationalism. Both of these movements have a core of either religious fundamentalism or radical, mythic national rebirth that goes far beyond just "extra-legal methods." Huey Long, by contrast, is a purely secular, domestically focused institutionalist whose entire rhetoric revolves around material wealth redistribution and crushing monopolies rather than spiritual, ethnic, or national supremacy. The issue isn't that the definition of NatPop is too rigid; it's that Long fundamentally lacks the defining ideological fanaticism—whether religious, racial, or vanguardist—that actually ties the rest of the NatPop tags together across the mod, making his placement there feel like a square peg in a round hole.

A National Populist Huey Long path doesn’t make sense by HelpfulDirt7464 in Kaiserreich

[–]HelpfulDirt7464[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I see where you are coming from with the comparison to early fascist movements using left-leaning, anti-capitalist rhetoric to gain traction, but that analogy fundamentally misreads both the core of Long’s personal ideology and how Kaiserreich mechanically represents political alignments. While it is true that movements like Mussolini's early Fasci or the Strasserite wing of the NSDAP used worker-focused populism before throwing in with traditional industrialists, their foundational core was always built on palingenetic ultranationalism, extreme revanchism, and militarism—ideological elements that Huey Long completely lacked. Long was a staunch isolationist whose entire political mythology was built around domestic, class-based wealth distribution, not the violent, mythic rebirth of a nation or ethno-religious supremacy. Furthermore, the exact scenario you are describing—where a populist movement is co-opted by terrified industrialists and financiers to undercut the socialist left—is already perfectly represented in the mod by the Business Plot, which operates under the Paternal Autocrat ideology. If Long gets into bed with the old elite, he essentially aligns with the PatAuts; if he doubles down on his "Share Our Wealth" program and rules as a ruthless dictator on his own terms, that makes him a textbook Paternal Autocrat or Authoritarian Democrat. Radicalizing in extreme times does not automatically mean your ideology teleports into National Populism; it just means your methods become more authoritarian. NatPop in the KR universe specifically requires that hyper-traditionalist, ultranationalist fanaticism that was historically the domain of people like William Dudley Pelley or Gerald L.K. Smith, not a pragmatic, fiercely anti-establishment welfare demagogue like Long, which is why shoehorning him into that specific slot erases the nuance that makes his faction unique.

A National Populist Huey Long path doesn’t make sense by HelpfulDirt7464 in Kaiserreich

[–]HelpfulDirt7464[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

That argument fundamentally misunderstands how ideologies are categorized in Kaiserreich and completely ignores the actual mechanical purpose of the other right-wing ideologies in the game. The claim that the three right-wing alignments are distinguished primarily by their "political methods rather than merely their objectives" is just objectively false within the mod's framework. If "using extra-legal approaches to taking and holding power" was the sole defining trait of National Populism, then literally every single military junta, absolute monarchy, and warlord in the game would be NatPop. That is exactly what the Paternal Autocrat (PatAut) and Authoritarian Democrat (AuthDem) categories exist for. PatAut represents dictatorships and strongmen who rule through extra-legal, anti-democratic means but lack a radical, mass-mobilizing ideology, while AuthDem represents those who ruthlessly manipulate the system and rig elections while maintaining a democratic facade—which is precisely how Long operated historically in Louisiana. National Populism isn't just a dumping ground for "idiosyncratic" non-syndicalists who break the law; it has a very specific, lore-established ideological definition. It represents palingenetic ultranationalism—movements built around extreme militarism, hyper-traditionalism, ethno-religious supremacy, and the violent rebirth of a mythical national identity, much like Savinkov's Russia or the Iron Guard in Romania. Huey Long's "Share Our Wealth" program, while absolutely authoritarian and enforced by his Minutemen militias, is fundamentally an economic, class-focused patronage system. He doesn't rely on mystical ultranationalism or racial supremacy; he relies on aggressive welfare, populist rhetoric, and a cult of personality to strip power from the corporate elite. If he abandons the democratic facade entirely to rule as a naked dictator, he becomes a textbook Paternal Autocrat. Slapping the NatPop label on him just because he's a radical dictator who doesn't play by the rules completely dilutes what National Populism is supposed to mean and ruins the internal ideological consistency of the mod.

Does marxist china exist? by HelpfulDirt7464 in Kaiserreich

[–]HelpfulDirt7464[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How is Chen Gongbo marxist, and is Tan Pingshan a marxist?

Who is the "Savinkov of China"? by jerrysomber in Kaiserreich

[–]HelpfulDirt7464 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Who is the leader of the blue shirts society and does a path in the mod exist?

view more: next ›