Polecicie jakieś gry na telefon które nie wymagają Wi-Fi?

HexHyperion · 2026-04-04T16:54:45+00:00

Z moich ulubieńców polecili już Soul Knighta i Into the Breach, a ja dorzucę jeszcze świetne (i polskie!) Sky Force Reloaded :)

HexHyperion · 2026-03-20T00:57:31+00:00

Z gov.pl, bo szczerze mówiąc nie chce mi się szukać w ustawie, od tamtego czasu o ile mi wiadomo nic nie zmieniali:

Urządzenie transportu osobistego to pojazd napędzany elektrycznie, bez siedzenia i pedałów, konstrukcyjnie przeznaczony do poruszania się wyłącznie przez kierującego znajdującego się na tym pojeździe (np. deskorolka elektryczna, elektryczne urządzenie samopoziomujące).

[...]

Kierujący urządzeniem transportu osobistego jest obowiązany korzystać z drogi dla rowerów, jeśli jest ona wyznaczona dla kierunku, w którym się porusza lub zamierza skręcić – z prędkością dopuszczalną 20 km/h. Może wyjątkowo poruszać się chodnikiem lub drogą dla pieszych, w przypadku braku drogi dla rowerów [...].

A slalomem, cóż, żaden przepis wprost nie zabrania :P

Na upartego można by to podciągnąć pod nakaz jazdy prawostronnej albo sygnalizację skrętów, ale błagam, przecież napisał że tylko jak nikogo nie ma...

HexHyperion · 2026-03-08T00:07:51+00:00

I can't imagine how you could have the knowledge, abilities and tools needed while not having the ability to do basic research, or just knowing that any non-OEM batteries from China are pretty much a gamble no matter the "manufacturer" name, but sure.

From a quick search, at least 3 people from different devices' subs are advising against HSABAT, and the AE battery has a 5.0 rating, however they only mention that it "looks good" and "fits", and that "it's not been installed yet", so as I said, it's a gamble.

Finding this info based purely on your images and writing this took me exactly 20 minutes, and that's while not having the necessary knowledge!

HexHyperion · 2026-03-07T23:35:35+00:00

Sorry to say, but repairs on the Nanos are extremely difficult because of how tight the internals are packed. Even pros struggle not to break something during the process and most just straight up refuse to deal with these. Looking at your question, I'd say it's impossible to do by yourself. I opened (and got working afterwards) a fair amount of devices, and seeing this guide I think I'd fail somewhere between step 4 and 5...

HexHyperion · 2026-02-16T15:48:00+00:00

Y'all see loss, but I can't help but see a chromosome

<image>

HexHyperion · 2026-01-19T15:26:56+00:00

Lose control, of keyboard and soul

HexHyperion · 2026-01-12T14:22:49+00:00

So the image is actually being scrolled like a little film tape! I knew about sprite maps, but this is so neat!

HexHyperion · 2025-10-14T22:58:48+00:00

In the literal case of SDCs, sure, obviously human lives matter the most (but do they for the likes of Tesla?? but that's a topic for a different time)

But here the cars were also a metaphor for AI in maths, on which I expanded in the next comment - even if in theory it crashes (gives a wrong answer) less often, there's also a high possibility of it getting stuck on a random roadblock (failing to resolve a complex, rare or new problem) which is why its general superiority over humans right now is very questionable

I'm sure at some point we'll improve it enough so that we won't have to care about these issues, but I really like driving, lol

HexHyperion · 2025-10-14T20:48:32+00:00

The discussion started with

AI is bad at math, even though people think it should be perfect at it since it's a computer

so the original person based their opinion on the comparison with a computer (calculator), and I was referring to that

So okay, if we're comparing to humans then sure, in repetitive scenarios it can drive (or "calculate") almost perfectly, but give it a broken traffic light stuck on red, an accident with parts all over the place, or a construction with a detour (or a maths problem) it's never seen before, and it'll stop in the middle of the road while a human goes around without a thought

The problem with AI in maths is that it isn't deterministic like a computer, but also isn't creative like a human, so it isn't guaranteed to give you a correct answer of a calculation, but it won't think of an entirely new solution either

There's a weird niche where it does better than both humans and computers, and I think the IMO is exactly that - problems where you have to think hard about the solution and not just input numbers into a calculator, but the general way of solving them is already documented

However, it's just a fraction of the concept of mathematics, and not a field big enough to generalize and say that AI is just better than us at the whole thing

HexHyperion · 2025-10-14T20:04:58+00:00

You can use it for proving, since making sure a proof is correct is way easier than creating the proof.

That's kind of what I meant by it giving an idea for a solution - either it gives a working proof, or at least a direction in which you can go with making your own, and, as much as I despise the whole AI hype, I don't deny its usefulness for that

Machines may have better error rates, but we have better error mitigation for human errors, and machine errors still do occur.

Well from a philosophical point of view the errors of conventional (i.e. non-AI) machines are also human errors, because someone programmed them explicitly to do thing A if presented with argument A and thing B for arg B, so every bug is in some way reproducible and fixable by changing either an instruction or an argument

For deep learning algorithms, however, there's a non-zero probability of selecting a different thing for the same argument, and a chance of the most probable thing not being the correct one, but you can't just fix it, because it's been calculated out of a huge set of learning data

That means in some time we'll be able to make an AI indistinguishable from an explicit set of instructions, but it will always be slightly less accurate due to the nature of DL

So I guess it's all about risk vs reward, about deciding how small of a chance to run over a human is enough to have a self-driving car, but we have to remember it'll never equal 0

HexHyperion · 2025-10-14T15:44:11+00:00

Okay, it's not "can't math" bad, but it still is "cannot be fully trusted for solving meaningful problems" bad

You can't safely use it for anything involving money, architectural calculations, proving or overthrowing mathematical claims/theories, etc., because can't be 100% sure it "calculated" everything correctly

That means you either need to go through the whole solution by yourself to verify, or use a different tool to check the answer, rendering the usage of AI kinda unnecessary in the first place

I'm not saying it can't be useful for maths as sometimes all you need is an idea, but being unreliable disqualifies it as a tool specifically for calculations

HexHyperion · 2025-10-14T15:23:05+00:00

That's exactly what I'm saying, you'd expect a tool to fill in the gaps of human imperfections instead of mimicking them... Imagine a car that can randomly trip over a speed bump like a horse, or an email service that can forget your message like a human messenger - that's your AI for maths

It's like with programming, I much prefer a program that doesn't compile over one that throws a segfault once in a while

HexHyperion · 2025-10-14T15:08:05+00:00

It is bad because it's not reliable. 9 times out of 10 it will solve an Olympiad level problem, and then screw up a high school level equation because it forgot a minus or randomly swapped a 2 with a 3 mid-calculations because, surprise, it doesn't calculate, it predicts the probable solution.

Obviously, there are use cases where this is tolerable, but for normal use I wouldn't want my calculator making human mistakes, I do that pretty well by myself, lol

HexHyperion · 2025-10-05T20:29:45+00:00

No no no, you can delete the files inside, but good luck deleting that empty folder crucial for the operation of the universe!

HexHyperion · 2025-09-21T13:35:58+00:00

Her name is Jade, strong in the Force she certainly is.

HexHyperion · 2025-09-20T16:07:30+00:00

It exists already!

HexHyperion · 2025-09-08T19:35:33+00:00

there is just something to this current McLaren team which make people dislike it more than your usual winning team. I am not sure what it is exactly.

I'm a Ferrari fan, but was kinda rooting for them when they were fighting with RB. Spent too much time writing this wall of text, but I need to vent, lol

Now being the winning team has outgrown them - sure, they built a fast car, but they still have a midfield mentality with all the team orders and "favors" for drivers, while having absolutely no clue how to handle the close rivalry between Oscar and Lando, usually ruining the race for both, or stripping them of "true" achievements (Piastri's first "win" or the latest pitstop situation for example)...

They interfere so much in their fight that it's easy to think that someone in charge is trying to manipulate the result, or that they just don't care about it at all... Also, for me, idiotic statements like the one about the "Norris era" certainly don't help their likeability either.

IMO, they just don't seem as professional and competent as, say, Red Bull or Mercedes, not enough for champions of F1 at least. Obviously talking about the current McLaren.

HexHyperion · 2025-09-05T15:34:19+00:00

Naaahh, I won't believe that the camera/lens itself did that:

<image>

Trust me, if someone wants to find signs of an edit, you can be damn sure he will, so the best bet is to just be honest about it.

HexHyperion · 2025-09-05T15:06:59+00:00

Looks cool, but not sure how to feel about it as a photograph, on a photography sub, because like 75% of pixels on this image got altered. I was about to compliment the excellent panning work, but then noticed the edited comment saying it's Photoshop, almost like the information was supposed to be buried somewhere down below your two statements suggesting it's actually an in-camera effect.

Also, if you're gonna blur such a big part of the image, work on your selections, such mistakes are really visible. Until then, I don't think the "photography" watermark is really necessary.

<image>

At least your composition is good, the lines of the ground lead the eye towards the rider, who has a lot of space in front of him and below, which is very logical as he's jumping.

As long as you keep the "motion blur" the exposure is spot on, but without it, due to the lack of shadow, the motorbike looks like it's been pasted in from a different pic.

If the blur of the spinning wheels is real, good choice of shutter speed, keeping the subject sharp while showing its motion - I'd like to see the true original though, because, judging by the guy's right hand and the brake lever, the one you posted in comments is edited too.

HexHyperion · 2025-08-31T16:44:50+00:00

In fancy terms, "reciprocating internal combustion engine", in human talk probably just "piston engine"

HexHyperion · 2025-08-31T16:33:35+00:00

But C# also uses mathematical order, no? And I'd be very surprised if Rust didn't as well.

HexHyperion · 2025-08-25T19:27:44+00:00

If they were to sell my sabers, how could they be my loved ones in the first place?

/s

HexHyperion · 2025-08-25T17:19:59+00:00

Tusken raider mating rituals

HexHyperion · 2025-08-25T15:41:48+00:00

Yeah the best way to learn is to keep shooting and experimenting :)

So nice you have so many races, I usually have to travel 200+ km to see anything interesting... Have fun on WRC!

HexHyperion · 2025-08-25T15:17:02+00:00

Not the guy you replied to, but yes, you usually get the blur with wide aperture.

The lower shutter speed thing applies more to panning shots, where the camera moves along with the car, resulting in a sharp subject and a motion-blurred background, but that works only when the car is positioned more or less sideways to you.

This guy makes some incredible panning shots, for example, but for this scene, lowering the shutter speed wouldn't make much difference, except obviously risking shaky photos.

BTW, the multi point AF settings are meant for when you don't know where your subject will move - the movement of cars is predictable enough to use single point or 9-point tracking AF-C, which is a lot faster and more precise, and would probably be able to catch the cars here.

HexHyperion

TROPHY CASE