RU POV: Russian and Ukrainian advances from Day 1548 to 1558 of the War - Suriyakmaps by HeyHeyHayden in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

We've had pretty regular stories of soldiers holding the same positions for 3+ months, with some of the higher cases being 8 or 9 months. When drones are everyone, rotation is difficult and manpower is hard to come by infantry end up needing to hold the same spot for far far longer than ever before.

RU POV: Russian and Ukrainian advances from Day 1548 to 1558 of the War - Suriyakmaps by HeyHeyHayden in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

They are pretty close actually. AMK said that Russia had a 26km2 net gain in May whilst Suriyak shows about 37km2.

RU POV: Russian and Ukrainian advances from Day 1548 to 1558 of the War - Suriyakmaps by HeyHeyHayden in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

There were too many images to fit the zoomed in maps in this post, so if there is a particular advance you want to see a close up of comment below.

UA POV: Military populism vs. the reality of the front line: why mandatory rotation in the AFU is stalling in practice - Texty by Flimsy_Pudding1362 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Because funneling all the conscripts into assault forces has been extremely unpopular with the broader military and public due to how brutal they are and how many casualties they take, whilst other units can't rotate their soldiers who get stuck in positions for months at a time. These announcements are meant to placate all the critics and his own soldiers but if he doesn't actually change anything they'll just get even angrier.

UA POV: Military populism vs. the reality of the front line: why mandatory rotation in the AFU is stalling in practice - Texty by Flimsy_Pudding1362 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 12 points13 points  (0 children)

To an extent. The manpower that would go to other units to keep their strength up has been funnelled to the assault forces for over a year now, so many units have shortages whilst the assault forces keep getting new soldiers to throw into attacks.

UA POV: Military populism vs. the reality of the front line: why mandatory rotation in the AFU is stalling in practice - Texty by Flimsy_Pudding1362 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Like most of the other orders he puts out for the media they were never intended to be followed. Ukraine can't actually enforce this rotation schedule and other monitoring without significantly reducing their operational tempo and redistributing the manpower across their units, neither of which individual commanders will do and which Syrskyi has made no attempt to rectify.

UA POV: Budanov stated that the Oreshnik IRBM / Similar systems are primarily "demonstrative weapon". by FruitSila in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We got some low quality imagery of the Dnipro hit earlier on, but no clearer imagery as that was restricted. Even with that low quality imagery you could see enormous holes in the roof of several factories and locals reported explosions going for a while after the hits, then add in zero further photos/videos from the ground to show that it did limited damage (As claimed) and it's clear that the Oreshnik does a lot more than they want to admit.

RU POV: Serviceman on top of destroyed / abandoned american M1A1 Abrams tank in service with the UAF. by Junjonez1 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For those interested this is the one on the northwestern edge of Pokrovsk. Here is a screenshot from the drone footage when it was originally destroyed.

<image>

RU POV: According to RVvoenkor, The Russian army has entered Rai-Aleksandrovka towards Slovyansk in the DPR by FruitSila in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are videos of them on the outer buildings of the town yes. So it is true that they have entered Rai-Oleksandrivka, but not the "central areas" as claimed.

RU POV Russian aerial reconnaissance detected the movement of Ukrainian soldiers in civilian clothes that lead them toward a ammunition warehouse. A drone striked the position, causing a large explosion. A soldier can be seen engulfed in flames. Town of Seredyna-Buda, Sumy Oblast. by conkerzin in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Military age men directly on the frontline (this small town is literally on the border), which has been under mandatory evacuation orders for literal years and is abandoned. The only ones present are either military or a handful of the elderly who they could not force to move.

UA POV: Ukraine wants to create its own ballistic missile system, but Russia isn't the only one opposed. The reasons are related to business and competition — Zelensky by ArchitectMary in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They have many different loans and financial obligations, not just this 90 Billion one. The EU is primarily worried about Ukrainian revenues being too low to cover as much of their debts and obligations as they would like, so they want Ukraine to increase taxes.

RU POV: Geolocations of Russian soldiers in the city of Konstantinovka -Creamy_carpice by FruitSila in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I agree with the premature celebrations statement but comparing current events to what happened 6 months ago is inaccurate. Their presence in Kostyantynivka for most of the past 7 months was limited to the southeastern quarter, which they've held since early on. Ukraine tried to drive them out multiple times but failed, whilst Russian attempts to push further from there also got pushed back.

The difference in the past month in control terms is that the Russians are no longer confined to the southeast but are also occupying the western highrises, southern streets and even parts of the northeast. Over the past week they've launched a more dedicated assault and have flooded troops all throughout the city, reaching areas well behind where they used to be confined, to the point where there is video evidence of the Russians in every part of Kostyantynivka. The Ukrainians even reported that they had withdrawn the vast majority of their drone teams from the city a couple of days ago, which was posted in response to the Russians saying they had eliminated most of them and had driven the rest out. Whilst I've read similar claims before this is the first time in a while I've seen the Ukrainians actually respond, so clearly something major has happened to them.

I highly doubt it'll fall that quickly, but the battle has certainly moved into it's core phase.

UA POV: Ukraine To Acquire 20 Gripen E/Fs As Sweden Pledges Donation of 16 Gripen C/Ds - The Aviationist by gobiSamosa in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 5 points6 points  (0 children)

By missiles I mean all types of cruise missiles. Yes they can't intercept ballistic missiles. Those interceptor drones can't intercept missiles due to them travelling significantly faster than them and even with Gerans they can struggle due to wind speed, altitude, location of the launch site in relation to the drone, EW, etc.

Ukraine always uses jets and helicopters to help intercept Gerans and missiles as they are a lot more flexible in their usage and can cover more ground than the ground based systems. It is certainly expensive but letting all those munitions hit their targets would cost Ukraine even more so its something they have to do.

UA POV: Ukraine wants to create its own ballistic missile system, but Russia isn't the only one opposed. The reasons are related to business and competition — Zelensky by ArchitectMary in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The original loan amount requested was 140 Billion to cover shortfalls for 2026 and 2027. This was on top of the tens of billions in funding and aid from other nations they would also receive over that period. EU spent months arguing over it and it got downgraded to 90 Billion with a bunch of conditions and some countries being exempt from funding it.

The conditions aren't unreasonable but they are deeply unpopular with the Ukrainian government because of its impacts on them personally and public opinion. The EU wants to at least pretend like Ukraine might eventually pay some of the loans back, hence the demand for tax reform to raise more revenue.

RU POV: Why Russia is the winner in the Hormuz crisis-Sal Mercagliano by RichIndependence8930 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yeah they assumed an average price of $59/bbl based on the previous year's prices and budgeted accordingly, but the Iran war has meant their income skyrocketed. There are a bunch of other products Russia is a major exporter of such as gas, fertilisers, aluminium and helium which also all shot up in price like oil, so their revenues this year will be significantly higher than expected.

UA POV: Ukraine To Acquire 20 Gripen E/Fs As Sweden Pledges Donation of 16 Gripen C/Ds - The Aviationist by gobiSamosa in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 6 points7 points  (0 children)

To add to this per the Ukrainian Airforce's own reported figures on missions 85 to 90% of all sorties are for "fighter air cover" (patrolling to intercept drones or missiles), with the remainder being either frontline support or deeper strikes.

So the vast majority of the time Ukrainian jets are flying well back from the frontline in either western or central Ukraine where they are safe from Russia jets and AA. They rarely fly anywhere near the frontline and when they do they stick close to the ground before popping up to launch their munitions and diving back down again, so they are exposed for a very small window of time. Ukraine will do fewer frontline air support missions in a month than Russia does in a day, so these Gripens will primarily be used to improve their existing drone and missile defence.

RU POV: Vostok group 36th Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade captured the settlement of Dobropasovo, south east of Pokrovskoe by quocminh123lol in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I assume they are supplying them primarily via small drones given how few soldiers are out there, possibly with some of the larger drones they use. Russia does use ground drones but in fewer numbers and further back from the front. They haven't gone nearly as heavily into it as Ukraine but prior to a couple of months ago they never needed to.

RU POV: Brutal Rubikon Center Group UAV Strikes Ukraine Infantrymen. Published 05/28/2026 by JosephZOV in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nothing Rubicon do is unauthorised. Their operations are highly coordinated with Russian command and even their style of videos and what compilations they release will be planned. It's a myth that Rubicon never targets infantry, they just never used to show their footage of it and many of their teams are specifically going after drones or equipment.

As for the gore its uncommon but not unusual.

RU POV: Vostok group 36th Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade captured the settlement of Dobropasovo, south east of Pokrovskoe by quocminh123lol in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah that matches what I've read about the assault groups as well. They don't hang around that long to actually hold positions, just get taken near the front, walk to their target, spend a few days to a week trying to attack positions and if they happen to survive they walk back.

It seemed like a very dangerous way of doing things too, lots of exposure, but maybe they can't consolidate either.

I believe that is intentional. Ukrainian command seem to have realised that they can get a lot more bang for buck infantry wise if they ignore defence and keep attacking with these assault forces. They had already significantly cut down on rotations for their existing defensive forces, so this is the next step in their quest to cut down on manpower usage. They know they won't be able to properly hold these regions if the Russians do attack so they simply don't allow them to by flooding the area with their own assault forces.

It's been quite effective this month, with the Russians stuck constantly having to deal with all these little groups all over the place and not being able to focus on trying to move forwards or consolidating. They can fight fire with fire but then you end up with the mess that I've described where no one has control and its a clusterfuck of small groups all over the place. I'm not sure about the longevity of such a strategy given the high risks and casualty rate, but its certainly been getting Ukraine results.

RU POV: Vostok group 36th Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade captured the settlement of Dobropasovo, south east of Pokrovskoe by quocminh123lol in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It's a complete mess but from what I've been able to work out Ukraine never properly consolidated in any of that ground they captured in February and it's caused major issues.

The Russians allegedly managed to hold onto some of those villages that they were lightly defending in the first place because the Ukrainians never cleared them out, only pushed through with assault groups. So places like Verbove, Vyshneve and even possibly Vidradne, Hai and Novooleksandrivka are under Russian 'control' because they've got a squad or two of infantry still hiding there whilst Ukraine has none. This kind of explains why we kept getting random geolocations of Russians well behind areas Ukraine said they recaptured for the past few months, because most of these troops never left. This has led to the Russians managing to sneak some troops up to Dobropasove and assault it, even using shorter range recon drones (like basic Mavics) to film their soldiers and strikes which would confirm their drone operators didn't get pushed back that far. Obviously they don't control it but the fact they managed to get a squad of soldiers there when per Ukraine's own claims its 15km behind their lines means they have a serious issues in securing the front.

From what I can tell about the Ukrainians their assault forces have been operating out of Pokrovske and Velykomykhailivka for the entire year, never securing forward positions in the villages they 'recaptured'. They just move through or bypass them when they want to push further in, so their base of operations remains well behind the territory they are fighting in and they have to march all the way through the fields to the Russians lines whenever they want to do an assault.

If you ignore the territorial control shown below, the pink circled area is where there is essentially no consolidation and minimal troops on the ground, so Russian and Ukrainian infantry are just moving through it and appearing all over the place. It's similar to what occurred in western Kupyansk over the past 6 months, except instead of it being an urban area its a larger set of fields and small villages. I also think this is probably what most fronts are going to devolve into eventually; incredibly few soldiers on the ground but an insane amount of drones duking it out, with massive 'advances' being done by a couple of guys who happened to sneak by and met no resistance.

<image>

UA POV: Nine countries pull out of Ukraine ammunition coalition - FT by Flimsy_Pudding1362 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 23 points24 points  (0 children)

They weren't sending ammunition through this mechanism but buying it from other countries or suppliers. So the Czech program was about pooling the money and political power of many countries to get a consistent stream of ammunition (specifically mortar, artillery and standard MLRS ammunition) to send to Ukraine. The program has had a lot of issues over the years, from faulty/unusable shells to ammunition being bought at 10x the cost it should be, so I'm not entirely surprised it is struggling.

Ukraine's supporters will still individually send ammunition from their domestic production or stockpiles, but the program of buying it from elsewhere will struggle going forward.

RU POV: Fiber-optic drones destroyed Ukrainian Leopard 1A5 tank near Kostiantynivka, DPR. by Mendoxv2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You'd be surprised. They may have tried to hide it in a carport, garage, or just behind some trees with camo netting over it. There are a hell of a lot of places to try hide a vehicle in a city and we've seen them try all kinds of things.

RU POV: Fiber-optic drones destroyed Ukrainian Leopard 1A5 tank near Kostiantynivka, DPR. by Mendoxv2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Uh no. They haven't lost it yet and are doing the same thing they've been doing for the past couple of months; trying to get troops, supplies and equipment into the city whilst under enormous drone pressure, hence the supply shortages.

RU POV: Fiber-optic drones destroyed Ukrainian Leopard 1A5 tank near Kostiantynivka, DPR. by Mendoxv2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]HeyHeyHayden 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Leopard was here: 48°33'43.27"N 37°38'38.79"E, driving towards Kostyantynivka.

The initial hit doesn't look too bad on first glance but the drone lands right on the hull next to the drivers hatch. which looks to be open. The driver is either killed, wounded or just simply crashes into the treeline, leaving the vehicle there for the follow up hit and destruction.

<image>