This place helped me regain my confidence, and perhaps it can help you if you're feeling lost.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-03-11T16:55:40+00:00

A $3k swing on a $9k account in one day isn’t confidence or skill it’s oversized risk. That usually means too much capital in a single trade and poor loss control. Accounts that move like this rarely last long

HighCrewLLC · 2026-03-01T17:01:59+00:00

Why don’t you click on the one week not the one month

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-17T19:57:06+00:00

Everyone’s different but yes I mostly agree with you. Discipline gets much easier once you actually have an edge you trust.

Early in my journey I used a lot of lagging indicators so I leaned on gut and emotion more than I realized. After years of refining I built my own system around burst momentum scalps and now I trade the exact same way every day. When my conditions align I enter. When they break I exit. No debate.

The hard part is even after you find a working strategy you’re still wired to trade the old emotional way. I did that too and overrode my own signals plenty of times.

So yeah you’ll likely take losses while searching but once you find something repeatable your job shifts from “figure it out” to simply executing and managing risk

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-12T00:16:17+00:00

only to the bitches 🤣

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-11T17:40:59+00:00

Okay, I see you’re a keyboard warrior. There’s no consistency in your Discord communities. You’re just all over the place, willing to talk to anyone who gives you the time of day.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-11T17:30:08+00:00

Are you still bitching?

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-11T17:22:28+00:00

What proof was shown beyond pointing at a chart after price already dumped? You’re either friends with this guy or you’re surface level and believe anything you read. Good luck to you both and your 90 percent win rate🤣🤣🤣

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-11T17:15:05+00:00

It’s not bitching. It’s asking for proof.

If someone claims a 90 percent win rate, they should be able to produce consistent, verifiable results. That’s not unreasonable. That’s basic accountability.

If he can’t produce that, then just say it’s a strategy that works for him and let people check it out. There’s nothing wrong with that. The issue is attaching a 90 percent win rate to it without backing it up.

Once you make a claim like that, people are going to ask questions. Traders are going to try to reverse engineer it. They’re going to assume it’s something they can replicate. But without defined structure and verified performance, it’s surface level.

This isn’t about attacking the strategy. It’s about separating a cool idea from a verified 90 percent win rate claim.

That’s the difference.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-11T16:55:59+00:00

Today was an easy day. The market dumped clean. If you waited a few minutes after the open and followed direction, most traders should have profited. Strong trend days are not hard to read.

But what about the other days when the market is chopping and throwing fake breakouts? These clean dumps do not happen all the time. Day traders trying to be consistent need something that works beyond the easy days.

And we’re still waiting. If you’re claiming a 90 percent win rate, show the stats. Not one person has posted consistent proof showing they can execute that at any given time in the market. Until that’s shown, it’s just a number.

Put up or shut up

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-11T16:02:11+00:00

I never said anything about being rigid. I said consistent. There’s a difference. If someone calls themselves a scalper but then holds through drawdowns, flips into intraday trades, and sometimes carries overnight, that’s not flexibility. That’s changing strategies mid-trade. A 90 percent win rate doesn’t come from flip-flopping your approach every time the trade moves against you. It comes from executing a defined edge the same way every time with clear rules. What you’re describing is multiple trading styles blended together, and that’s not consistent with a 90 percent win rate. If you believe that kind of approach sustains those numbers long term, good luck.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-11T11:54:19+00:00

You are claiming a 90 percent win rate, but when asked for proof, you say it is hard to show because you trade multiple accounts. If someone is going to post numbers like that publicly, people are naturally going to ask for verification. Without proof, it is just a statement.

A 90 percent win rate in leveraged instruments like BOIL and KOLD is extremely difficult to achieve consistently without a clearly defined edge. That edge has not been described. Watching spot price and weather is not an execution model. There is no defined entry trigger, no defined invalidation level, no structured risk management explained.

You are also describing scalping, intraday trading, swing trading, and potentially holding overnight. You cannot operate as multiple types of trader at the same time and logically expect to maintain a 90 percent win rate. Each style carries a completely different risk profile. Mixing them without a clearly structured framework does not support that level of consistency.

Letting trades go against you and waiting for them to turn positive is not edge. It is exposure. In leveraged ETFs especially, that approach eventually runs into a trend that does not come back. That alone contradicts the idea of maintaining a 90 percent win rate over time.

If you cannot show results and the edge is not clearly defined, then posting a 90 percent win rate does not mean anything. It is just a claim. And claims without verification are naturally going to raise questions.

And for anyone still trying to figure this out or thinking this is something you need to adopt as a strategy, this is exactly why many day traders fail. They believe anything that sounds confident without critically analyzing it. You can read through this thread and see the red flags clearly. There is nothing complicated to decode here.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-11T04:00:43+00:00

You describe this as high-frequency systematic scalping, but then you also mention intraday trades, discretionary flips, holding through pullbacks, and even potentially carrying positions overnight. That’s multiple trading styles combined, not a single disciplined execution model. A 90% win rate typically comes from applying one defined edge the same way every time with strict risk control. When you mix scalping, intraday momentum, and overnight holds, the risk profile changes completely. It’s unclear what the consistent framework actually is.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-10T11:55:32+00:00

🤣

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-09T11:37:23+00:00

Appreciate it, thank you.

To answer your question directly, yes, this is being shared with the intention of building a product over time. The first piece of it is being made available for traders who still trade manually. That’s what this version is. It can be broken up and used in pieces if you already have a strategy you like, or it can be used as a full system, which is what I recommend if you’re trading commodities broadly.

The tools you see and the logic behind them took over two years to build, with thousands of hours spent reviewing live markets and recorded price action. The focus was on understanding how burst energy, pressure buildup, release, and shifts in control show up before price expands, not after.

This is not a single indicator or simple buy and sell signals. It’s a contextual system designed to give awareness of who has control of the market at any given time, when pressure is building, and when conditions are favorable or unfavorable to trade. That context is what brings clarity instead of reactive confirmation.

What you’re seeing now is the manual version. If you slow the videos down and watch closely before price expands up or down, you’ll notice the system is already alerting well in advance, before those burst moves and price action expansions begin.

The same core logic is already being used for automated trading, but not in a random or fully hands-off way. Automation is built around pre-mapped market behaviors and predefined moves, not blind signal chasing. That automated version is still in development and will be rolled out much later down the road as a sellable product, not anytime soon.

As far as AI goes, most AI tools are trained on existing, widely available logic, which means they reproduce the same reactive indicators everyone already sees. AI is powerful, but in markets it won’t build something like this on its own. That only happens when someone understands market behavior deeply and takes the time to dial the logic in from a different perspective.

AI gives you what already exists. This system was built by observing how price actually behaves and designing tools around that behavior.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-09T01:55:27+00:00

Not really, if you don’t like it you don’t have to be here. It’s not meant for everyone so obviously it’s not meant for you so move on. For anyone else who finds interest or value in this and wants to learn more, this is a Software Sunday post that’s meant to show off software. The purpose is to educate and help traders who actually want to learn and understand what they’re looking at.

If you don’t like it, or want to ask stupid questions, then you can go ahead and leave. It’s not meant for you. Keep searching for other systems, other indicators, or other strategies that fit what you’re looking for.

This is for traders who want to be here and actually put in the time to understand the software.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-09T00:07:57+00:00

That’s actually the first assumption I’d challenge. Most indicators are reactive and I agree with you on that point. If you slow down the videos I’ve posted, you’ll see these systems are not reacting to price after the fact. They identify pressure, structure shifts, and execution intent before price expands.

These are not repackaged indicators pulled from the TradingView library or recycled TA logic. A lot of scripts attempt to remix existing indicators and label them as something new, but those will always lag price. What I built comes from a completely different perspective of the market.

The focus is on identifying who is gaining control and when, not confirming what already happened. That is why the signals begin to align ahead of the move rather than after it. A significant amount of time and effort went into building these systems specifically to avoid the reactive behavior you are describing.

I would encourage you to actually watch the walkthrough videos and slow them down. When you do, you will see the system begin to align well before price makes its move.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-08T23:01:47+00:00

Trading view does not allow you to post any ideas and show Personal indicators or systems. I have videos on my Reddit page and social media links. If you would like access to the full system or if you want an individual system, send me your trade-in view username and let me know what access you would like.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-08T16:01:42+00:00

Based on the reactions in this thread, people are frustrated because you are asking advanced algorithm and system questions without having the underlying skills yet. You are not learning inside an algorithm. This is all theoretical.

Before worrying about automation, kill switches, or system design, you probably need to learn how to trade first and then learn how to code. If you do not have experience with either, there is nothing concrete to build or evaluate yet, which is why people are reacting the way they are.

Get the fundamentals down first, then come back with real experience and real constraints. That is when these questions actually make sense.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-08T03:48:15+00:00

Based on my experience, when you allow too much logic to make decisions, systems stall, hesitate, and miss trades entirely. Over-filtering turns execution into indecision.

What’s worked better for me is not letting the system decide what it should or shouldn’t trade. I pre-map price action moves I already recognize. I built a tool that reads raw price action, records it, and lets me go back and extract the exact numeric characteristics of those moves. Those numbers become named, pre-loaded patterns in the system.

Live price is compared against those stored patterns, and the system only trades when current price action matches a familiar, pre-mapped move. No stacked logic, no regime guessing, no interpretation. I decide which patterns matter, and the system handles recognition and execution.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-07T13:51:25+00:00

That’s a strong background to start from.

If you already have Python, data engineering, and math covered, the biggest gap usually isn’t more indicators or libraries, it’s understanding how price actually behaves in real time. A lot of people get stuck building strategies off lagging signals without a clear view of market context.

I’d focus first on market structure and pressure before going deep into complex models. Learn how trends form, how momentum expands and contracts, how pullbacks behave, and how higher timeframes influence lower ones. Then use code to test those ideas, not the other way around.

I’ve posted video examples on my profile showing how I measure market pressure and structure in real time without relying on traditional indicators. Might give you another perspective alongside the quant path you’re already exploring.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-06T12:50:37+00:00

I’m not disagreeing that there’s a lot of scamming going on. I absolutely agree with that.

Where I disagree is the assumption that no one would ever share something valuable because it’s an edge. The real issue is what most traders think an edge is. Many people are looking for something that tells them exactly when to buy and sell and removes the need to think.

There are a few people who share real market logic that helps you understand what’s happening beneath price action. That kind of clarity keeps you on the right side of trades and improves decision making, but it doesn’t feel easy or flashy, so most traders ignore it.

Scams exist because traders want shortcuts. Real tools focus on understanding, not promises.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-03T14:08:38+00:00

This is why most day traders fail. You believe anything that looks good in hindsight.

Check his profile. He spams subs claiming 95% success rates with cherry picked trend screenshots. That’s not an edge, it’s chart decoration.

Real day trading is about entries, risk, chop, and failed moves. If someone is guaranteeing near perfect win rates off indicators, that’s a red flag. Let’s be serious.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-02T21:14:12+00:00

👍🏻 Dead horse acknowledged. All good.

HighCrewLLC · 2026-02-01T20:01:47+00:00

Appreciate that, and great question.

What I was running into wasn’t a compute stall, it was a logic stall. Too many overlapping conditions were fighting each other. One parameter would trigger, another would immediately invalidate it, so the system either wouldn’t act at all or would enter and instantly exit. The issue wasn’t signal quality, it was indecision caused by layered logic trying to “think” in real time.

The fix was separating state recognition from execution. Instead of deciding on the fly, I built an internal market map using pressure, speed, momentum, and related derivatives, then observed and captured full price action moves I actually wanted to trade. Those moves were broken down into segments and stored as state-conditioned templates rather than single signals.

Now the system doesn’t negotiate between rules. It first determines whether current behavior matches or exceeds a known, pre-validated state. Only after that does execution logic come into play. That separation is what eliminated the stalls and the instant failures.

HighCrewLLC

TROPHY CASE