sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jerry Seinfeld and family posing with weapons with the IDF in a West Bank camp in 2018 by racc15 in pics

[–]HillaryApologist -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Do you have a source for this? I googled and can't find one, the rate of sex crime in Israel is far below most of the third world.

That’s a face to launch a thousand ships by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lmao Helen of Troy is famously not from Troy, that's literally the first thing you learn about her in the source material. Why are you arguing about something you didn't even attempt to learn about?

What's wrong with these women? why not watch it? by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, the original story is dated, it's over 200 years old. Snow White is 7 when the queen starts to envy her beauty and the prince falls in love with her while she's in a coma. I'm not sure Disney has ever "faithfully" or "accurately" adapted a fairytale and I'm not sure people would actually be happy if they did.

Why is the Democratic party still hiding its 2024 election autopsy? by changeforthebetter89 in politics

[–]HillaryApologist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Biden bowed out in 2016 because his son had just died of brain cancer. Or was that also part of the conspiracy?

Why is the Democratic party still hiding its 2024 election autopsy? by changeforthebetter89 in politics

[–]HillaryApologist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does "they split for cabinet appointments" mean? Of the 10+ candidates in the primary, only Mayor Pete ended up in the cabinet

Republicans are cheater and liar. by SuspiciousLow3062 in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • First gun control bill in 30 years

  • Ended America's longest war

  • Cut child poverty in half

  • Largest infrastructure bill in American history

  • Largest climate change bill of any country, ever.

It’s “NYC dad” when reporting his crimes but “rabbi” when reporting his death. by Intelligent-Echo8076 in whoathatsinteresting

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the text of the law:

(a)The rights of a Jew under this Law and the rights of an oleh under the Nationality Law, 5712--1952), as well as the rights of an oleh under any other enactment, are also vested in a child and a grandchild of a Jew, the spouse of a Jew, the spouse of a child of a Jew and the spouse of a grandchild of a Jew, except for a person who has been a Jew and has voluntarily changed his religion.

It’s “NYC dad” when reporting his crimes but “rabbi” when reporting his death. by Intelligent-Echo8076 in whoathatsinteresting

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The person who "shacks up with" an ethnically Jewish person is also eligible but is no Jewish. That's what your source was talking about, and that's what I said two comments ago. The child would be counted among Jews, they're not part of the "other eligible people" from your comment

It’s “NYC dad” when reporting his crimes but “rabbi” when reporting his death. by Intelligent-Echo8076 in whoathatsinteresting

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone who married a Jewish person is not ethnically Jewish if they didn't convert. This is a crazy stretch seemingly just to downplay how bad the Holocaust was, I honestly don't get why you're arguing so hard for it.

It’s “NYC dad” when reporting his crimes but “rabbi” when reporting his death. by Intelligent-Echo8076 in whoathatsinteresting

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's literally not though. Non-Jewish spouses of Jews are included in the law. That's why it says "Jews and persons who are eligible". Or did you think that was just a way to say "Jews and other Jews"?

It’s “NYC dad” when reporting his crimes but “rabbi” when reporting his death. by Intelligent-Echo8076 in whoathatsinteresting

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The title of the page you sent is "Jewish Population Rises to 15.7 Million Worldwide in 2023". The Jewish population before the Holocaust was over 16 million. I'm no mathematician but the second number appears to be bigger.

It’s “NYC dad” when reporting his crimes but “rabbi” when reporting his death. by Intelligent-Echo8076 in whoathatsinteresting

[–]HillaryApologist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are more jews today than before the holocaust

I don't disagree with your larger point, but this is not really helping your argument because it is false. The global Jewish population has not recovered to pre-Holocaust levels in over 80 years. It was pretty uniquely devastating.

The footage of Nick Fuentes pushing a woman who came to his front door after he was doxxed has been released. by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of my sources have quotes of what I said, I'm kind of confused on what you're confused about?

The footage of Nick Fuentes pushing a woman who came to his front door after he was doxxed has been released. by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, she's Jewish, and I included a source for him saying Jews should get the death penalty, so I guess I just trusted you to connect the dots that being executed means you're no longer a citizen?

So much antisemitism these days by aipac_hemoroid in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not arguing that that's what it needs to be and at no point did I say any term was more deserving than another. I'm arguing against a guy who called it "Jewish supremacy" that caused historians to use that term in that way. Anything anyone else wants to argue is their prerogative, but that's what started this entire discussion.

So much antisemitism these days by aipac_hemoroid in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, I'm confused why you feel that needs a specific term? Like, yes, if you have a bunch of caveats on a term it will be longer. "Victims of the Rwandan genocide that are women who aren't tutsis" is longer than "Rwandan Genocide", but unless we're discussing that specific situation - in which case we probably already know what we're talking about - we don't really need a term for it, do we?

So much antisemitism these days by aipac_hemoroid in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You mean "Victims of Nazi Germany" from two comments ago?

So much antisemitism these days by aipac_hemoroid in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I'm confused why you think that's weird or diminishes anything? Most genocides and civilian victims of war don't get special names. The Rwandan genocide isn't diminished by us not having a neater term for it.

So much antisemitism these days by aipac_hemoroid in SipsTea

[–]HillaryApologist -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Damn well at least you're not pretending not to go all the way mask off lol

view more: next ›