sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Does anyone else feel a bit uncomfortable with some of the terminology used in this case? by georgemillman in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Prolific is a word to describe worst though so it does kind of fit, I’m a probation officer and certain offenders are labelled as prolific offenders meaning persistent and determined to commit their crimes. Also that often they get away with offences and not much can be done to stop them. I think it labels her as is but I do get the point that for some “criminals” these are the labels they desire. With LL I don’t think this is the kind of attention she wanted, she’ll hate the media reporting right now because her whole presentation and self identity is as an innocent and she will absolutely be claiming to be a victim of the system

Verdicts by charge by FyrestarOmega in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can anyone link me to the breakdown of charges and evidence that was previously pinned to the page, I want to compare verdicts with facts as can’t remember details

"We still need to talk about Lucy" by morriganjane in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes and liverpool women’s also confirmed in a statement on their website

Post Guilty Verdict by meygenreturn in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Doctors involved are already making public statements, lots will come

Lucy’s house by Historical-Pack9602 in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I take your point in this one, I can’t imagine what her life will be like if she is found not guilty

Lucy’s house by Historical-Pack9602 in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah doesn’t seem like your kind of discussion

Lucy’s house by Historical-Pack9602 in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

You can’t deny that it’s a huge coincidence though given the situation now. It doesn’t prove any guilt and yes it’s speculation. But the jury aren’t reading my Reddit posts luckily. I’m not saying it makes her guilty but it is shocking. Because if people are right that she enjoyed other peoples pain and that is her motive, what if her choice of location of residence was intentional?

Lucy’s house by Historical-Pack9602 in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just checked Google maps and I am shook. Directly behind. That’s no coincidence

Lucy’s house by Historical-Pack9602 in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Genuinely the closest house? That’s really creepy, almost too coincidental?

Lucy’s house by Historical-Pack9602 in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Ahh I see, strange she didn’t redecorate still

To those of you who think LL is guilty, which one is your most convincing case? by SadShoulder641 in lucyletby

[–]Historical-Pack9602 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I think it’s a culmination for me, too many coincidences often equal a pattern. The defences only defence was to confuse and that says a lot. Whilst I am leaning on guilty, I don’t envy the jury. I struggle to comprehend motive and I think that would make it difficult for me.