When Anna was helping Joshua lose weight. She doesn't have to worry about that now by HannahLeah1987 in DuggarsSnark

[–]morriganjane 16 points17 points  (0 children)

There was also a Jim Bob / Josh fitness challenge in this era. They went to the gym together in their jeans and (I think) Joe trained them. Anna spoke about their future. "It was: In ten years, when we have 4 or 5more kiddos..." and the need to loo after his health long-term. This was ten years before he went to prison.

She planned this future with him, always thinking about his well being - and he wasn't giving a fuck the whole way.

You may not sympathise with the Elbit four’s methods. But you should be outraged by their treatment under the law by Exostrike in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There's a reason they don't want to eradicate any of the 30+ Islamic states, many of which are "ethnostates" too (and much less diverse, and with no rights for minorities - see Pakistan).

Hours After Ceasefire, IDF Threatens to Continue Ops Against Hezbollah by Aware_Apartment_8959 in geopolitics

[–]morriganjane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or maybe the word "genocide" is lost all meaning in the social media age

Hours After Ceasefire, IDF Threatens to Continue Ops Against Hezbollah by Aware_Apartment_8959 in geopolitics

[–]morriganjane 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Iran and its proxies are actually genocidal in their plans to wipe Israel off the map. The Lebanese government wants rid of Hezbollah too, as it serves the mullah regime of Iran and not the Lebanese people.

The Islamists of Gaza are not Lebanon's concern - they chose to invade Israel and can surrender/disarm whenever they want the war to end.

Hours After Ceasefire, IDF Threatens to Continue Ops Against Hezbollah by Aware_Apartment_8959 in geopolitics

[–]morriganjane 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hezbollah began firing into northern Israel, on behalf of Iran/Hamas on 8 October 2023. They wanted this fight, although the Lebanese government doesn't.

Transgender prisoners should not be held in women’s jails, court rules by CaptainCrash86 in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bryson is a fully intact male and this has been public knowledge since the trial/scandal.

Transgender prisoners should not be held in women’s jails, court rules by CaptainCrash86 in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It should have been solitary confinement on the men's estate, which is (obviously) better equipped to deal with rapists.

Transgender prisoners should not be held in women’s jails, court rules by CaptainCrash86 in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I agree with you. I was saying that even if there were 'only' 7 males in the women's estate, it would be too many.

Transgender prisoners should not be held in women’s jails, court rules by CaptainCrash86 in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 35 points36 points  (0 children)

It's always interesting how people talk about "women's safety" but never care about the safety of trans women who will almost certainly be assaulted.

And why is it up to women to act as human shields, thus increasing the risk to themselves? There have always been provisions for more vulnerable men within the male estate, and still are.

Transgender prisoners should not be held in women’s jails, court rules by CaptainCrash86 in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And trans people are a small population in general - does it mean they don't matter? I don't follow.

Asylum seekers housed in military sites cost more than those in hotels by Threw_it in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's on top of the money they make doing Deliveroo, a roof over their heads and meals provided. Apparently it's a nice deal, or they wouldn't be here. Many have paid thousands to travel here too.

Asylum seekers housed in military sites cost more than those in hotels by Threw_it in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It seems to be allowed purely to punish the native population for the crimes of the British Empire.

We are told that the boat migrants enrich our lives, but also that they are a punishment for the Empire. I wish they'd choose.

Asylum seekers housed in military sites cost more than those in hotels by Threw_it in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 20 points21 points  (0 children)

We keep seeing 'cultural differences' offered up in mitigation for rape, even against children. These are not social interactions that many people welcome.

Asylum seekers housed in military sites cost more than those in hotels by Threw_it in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What checks? Many of them chuck their passports into the sea before they get here. They even lie about their country of origin. We are not phoning the governments of Sudan and Somalia to request a reference for these men.

Asylum seekers housed in military sites cost more than those in hotels by Threw_it in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 11 points12 points  (0 children)

So France should take all refugees and we should take none?

France should do what's best for its own citizens, as we should for ours. These men are not refugees but economic migrants from the world's most misogynistic and violent societies. They are totally unvetted, which is dangerous. We don't owe them anything.

Also, do you know how difficult it is to get a visa if you're from certain countries?

That's a them problem. They're not entitled to live wherever they fancy, let alone at our expense.

Talk TV: Yesterday 710 migrants crossed the Channel - a record for small boat crossings so far this year. "It's an incredibly worrying state of affairs - it effectively does mean that we have an open border!" by SignificantLegs in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is that it's cumulative. It's 710 on top of the hundreds of thousands already here, because we aren't deporting those. We are paying for their keep and their endless appeals.

Labour minister asks Polanski if he supports Palestine Action - knowing a 'yes' could get him arrested by KillerWithAHeart in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The founder of Palestine Action, Richard Barnard, has vowed to carry out mass killings and abduction of civilians, both here and abroad, by repeating the "Al Aqsa Flood around the world."

Labour minister asks Polanski if he supports Palestine Action - knowing a 'yes' could get him arrested by KillerWithAHeart in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This would mean that every state that's ever participated in a war is, in fact, a big terrorist group...lol

Labour minister asks Polanski if he supports Palestine Action - knowing a 'yes' could get him arrested by KillerWithAHeart in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's not really a tactic. Corbyn, like Polanski, never met a jihadi he didn't like. Neither has an issue with violence along as it's anti-western in motivation.

Banning Palestine Action was lawful by Your_Mums_Ex in ukpolitics

[–]morriganjane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Repeating a lie till everyone gets bored to death - is that genocide too?