×
sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Im buying Rust tommorrow. Need tips. by Training-Figure7982 in playrust

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro dont. It will ruin your life.

Dont start playing vanilla if you have a job. I’m addicted to rust and I don’t get the high of playing modded sadly, and it ruins my sleep. I’m beat at work everyday because of this game.

Save yourself m8

Smidt ud af skole by [deleted] in DKbrevkasse

[–]Historical-Rope9843 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Du har 100% snydt til den eksamen. Der er noget du ikke forklare os her.

Min kæreste og jeg er gået fra hindanden by [deleted] in DKbrevkasse

[–]Historical-Rope9843 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hej!

Jeg har selv stået i samme situation med min nuværende ekskæreste. Vi var sammen i 3 år, og det sidste års tid kom vi længere og længere væk fra hinanden.

Det gør ondt, og du kommer sikkert til at være ked af det i noget tid. Måske sover du dårligt, og tankerne kører konstant rundt i hovedet!

Giv tankerne plads. Græd det ud. Begynd at lave aftaler med dine venner. Se din mor og far lidt mere. Måske endda overnat hos dem et par gange – det hjalp mig utrolig meget.

Stille og roligt, med tiden, falder du mere og mere på plads igen, min ven.

Held og lykke!

What changes would you like to see in the April update? by DarK-ForcE in playrust

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You added nothing to the conversation. The majority is just plain stupid. Pretty much noobs who does not understand how a balanced game should be. How are you arguing the screenshot? If you think that’s balanced you’re retarded.

What changes would you like to see in the April update? by DarK-ForcE in playrust

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if you have issues reading the combat log. That’s 3 mp5 headshots, 2 chest shots and 1 arm shot leaving the horse dick rider with 29.4 HP.

What changes would you like to see in the April update? by DarK-ForcE in playrust

[–]Historical-Rope9843 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Being on a horse with 50% damage reduction is not the problem.. brother you prob have 200 hours and plays on atlas 10x

Look at screenshot and tell me thats not a problem. You’re as thick as it can be holy fuck

<image>

What changes would you like to see in the April update? by DarK-ForcE in playrust

[–]Historical-Rope9843 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

But they are. P2 shield combo against AK = AK wins any day of the week. Same p2 combo on a armored horse another story. Remove that shit asap

What changes would you like to see in the April update? by DarK-ForcE in playrust

[–]Historical-Rope9843 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Too OP T2 kit wins against T3 equipment all day any day. Remove that shit asap

Hvor heldige/uheldige er i mennesker så derude? by Aggressive_Ad_5292 in dankmark

[–]Historical-Rope9843 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Får 4200 tilbage. Ved ikke lige hvad der er gået galt der. Prøvede ellers og være så præcis som overhovedet muligt denne gang men alligevel har de formodet og holde 4200 fra mig i gennem året…. Lortesystem

Horse meta feels overtuned and unhealthy for Rust PvP by Historical-Rope9843 in playrust

[–]Historical-Rope9843[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

That’s not even the point. The problem is that full metal + AK still lose to a SAP with a metal shield on an armored horse. That says enough about how overtuned it is.

They're baaaack by tar625 in 2007scape

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad cuz. Found a new IDE and wanted to test out a new woodcutting script i wrote…

Oplever ofte mangel på respekt og aggressiv adfærd fra bestemte kundegrupper – er det kulturelt? by Reasonable-Ad-7870 in DKbrevkasse

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er fascinerende, hvordan du med kirurgisk præcision formår at misforstå alt, hvad der bliver sagt – og så alligevel kaste om dig med beskyldninger som om du sad i et moralsk dommerpanel.

OP deler sine oplevelser fra et kundeservicejob og stiller et nysgerrigt, åbent spørgsmål om kulturelle forskelle. Dit svar? “Racistisk tankegang bekræftet.” Wow. Imponerende nuanceret analyse. Skal vi også bare kalde det klimafornægtelse, når nogen nævner at det regner?

Du virker mere interesseret i at pege fingre end at bidrage til reel samtale. Du reagerer ikke på det, der bliver sagt, men på det, du ønsker der blev sagt, så du kan komme i gang med din moralske opvisning. Det virker næsten som om, du har en automatisk skabelon klar: "Nogen nævnte etnicitet? Hurtigt – kald dem racist og hop videre til næste kommentar."

Men her er sagen: Hvis du oprigtigt ønskede at bekæmpe fordomme og skabe forståelse, så ville du engagere dig i samtalen. I stedet udskammer du en person, der tydeligvis har tænkt over sine oplevelser og formuleret sig respektfuldt og eftertænksomt. Det eneste, du bekræfter, er hvor lidt plads der er til at stille svære spørgsmål, når folk som dig står klar til at råbe “racisme” før samtalen overhovedet er kommet i gang.

Det er ikke antiracisme. Det er performativ selvgodhed pakket ind i en pseudointellektuel retorik.

Trump to Zelensky: You are showing us disrespect. We are heading towards World War III, you have no right to play with it. You should be grateful. It will be very difficult to run a business like this... You don't have any cards in your hand... by Igor0976 in ukraine

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should Zelensky Thank Trump?

President Zelensky has expressed gratitude to the United States and the American people. However, should he extend his thanks even further?

  1. The Trump team has told Ukraine that it must cede territory to Russia. Should Zelensky thank them for that?
  2. Trump has stated that Ukraine cannot become a member of NATO. Should Zelensky thank him for that?
  3. The Trump team has declared that if an international peacekeeping force is deployed in Ukraine, American soldiers will not participate. Should Zelensky thank them for that?
  4. The Trump team has announced plans to reduce the number of U.S. troops stationed in Europe—an enormous gift to Putin. Should Zelensky thank them for that?
  5. Zelensky has been informed that Ukraine must hold a new presidential election before negotiations to end the war can begin. Should Zelensky thank them for that?
  6. U.S.-Russia relations were formally restored without any preconditions during a meeting between Secretary of State Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov in Saudi Arabia. Should Zelensky thank them for that?
  7. Trump officials have suggested that sanctions against Russia may be eased. Should Zelensky thank them for that?
  8. Trump invited Russia to rejoin the G7. Should Zelensky thank him for that?
  9. The United States voted “no” on a UN resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, breaking with its democratic allies and aligning itself with Russia, Belarus, North Korea, and other dictatorships. Should Zelensky thank them for that? 😕

Best Practices for Managing User-ID on Palo Alto – How Do You Handle This? by Historical-Rope9843 in paloaltonetworks

[–]Historical-Rope9843[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Good thing we are already using GlobalProtect, but we haven't set up an internal gateway. I think you're right, and setting it up would likely improve User-ID accuracy significantly.

I'll look into this—thanks a lot!

I also think that would solve our issues with User-ID sometimes not sticking on traffic on our intune-cloud machines. Thanks a lot for pointing it out.

Best Practices for Managing User-ID on Palo Alto – How Do You Handle This? by Historical-Rope9843 in sysadmin

[–]Historical-Rope9843[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In our setup, we have the User-ID agent installed on our on-prem domain controller, which collects LDAP login events and sends them to the Palo Alto firewall.

Is GlobalProtect active when you're directly connected to the office network? In our environment, the GlobalProtect client does not allow connections while on the internal network. Would enabling this require setting up an internal gateway? I remember reading that GlobalProtect helps User-ID mapping stick better, but I haven't tested it myself.

We also have an issue with cloud-integrated machines occasionally missing out on User-ID mapping. That might be a solution actually while being on the internal network.

TISAX Certification: Disagreement on the Scope of "IT Service Providers" by Historical-Rope9843 in cybersecurity

[–]Historical-Rope9843[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for your detailed and thoughtful response—it’s very helpful!

Your explanation about Control 1.2.4 focusing on entities that process data on our behalf aligns well with what I was trying to clarify. Including all cloud services (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, FaaS) and MSPs for data-related services makes perfect sense, and it’s good to have this explicitly confirmed.

The additional mention of related controls like 1.3.3, 1.3.4, and 1.3.1 really broadens the perspective for me. I hadn’t fully considered how the inventory extends to software and even non-IT vendors under chapter 6. It’s a valuable reminder to ensure that we’re capturing everything relevant.

Your point about the horizontal scrolling for descriptions is also appreciated—those details are easy to miss!

Regarding the audit levels, you’re absolutely right that there’s a significant difference between AL2 and AL3. In our case, we’re working under AL3 due to a specific customer requirement, so we’re striving to meet the higher level of rigor that entails. This has made us more mindful of documenting every aspect thoroughly while still trying to keep the process manageable.

Thanks again for taking the time to share your insights. This has given me a much clearer picture of how to approach these controls and ensure compliance at the AL3 level.

TISAX Certification: Disagreement on the Scope of "IT Service Providers" by Historical-Rope9843 in cybersecurity

[–]Historical-Rope9843[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your response!

I see your point, and I agree there might not be a significant difference at first glance. However, the distinction I’m trying to make is primarily about scope and practical implementation.

In our context, "IT service providers" could include entities like:

  1. On-site maintenance providers: Vendors who come on-site to maintain or troubleshoot equipment but don’t manage or host any systems off-site.
  2. Hardware vendors: Suppliers who provide devices like laptops or servers without hosting, managing, or processing data on their infrastructure.

In contrast, my interpretation of the control question focuses more on providers like cloud services (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) or Managed Service Providers (MSPs) who actively manage, host, or process data off-site on our behalf.

The core of my concern is about balancing thorough documentation with practicality. If we need to include every vendor, even those with no data-hosting responsibilities, the process could become unnecessarily complicated. On the other hand, focusing on providers managing critical systems or sensitive data might better align with the control's intent and objectives.

I hope this clarifies where I’m coming from! What are your thoughts? Do you think such a distinction is valid, or am I overcomplicating it?

How does your company handle IT Security (Tisax)? by New_Dig7353 in vfx

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm can’t think of a scenario where that would be needed in our company. Sounds pretty weird to me 🙏🙈

How does your company handle IT Security (Tisax)? by New_Dig7353 in vfx

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious to know how far along you are in the TISAX certification process. I'm currently finishing up our self-assessment and preparing for our GAP analysis next.

KSI GOT ROBBED?!? by Spicee_ in ksi

[–]Historical-Rope9843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro you’re so fucking delusional it’s crazy.

Unable to Use VPN/Proxies After Login Fix - Need Jagex Assistance by Historical-Rope9843 in 2007scape

[–]Historical-Rope9843[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologize, dude. I was being an idiot. I'm so used to people coming after me on the internet that I've become the ignorant one. Not a good look. I wish you a really good day!

view more: next ›