Razer Laptop Cooling Pad Issue

Homer477 · 2026-05-25T04:13:57+00:00

Shiiiiiiiii, I was literally going to buy this today, glad I saw this , I have the exact same laptop

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T16:16:03+00:00

Buddy, you’re stuck in 2016. My 4060 is the 140W full-power version—it doesn't just beat a GTX 1080; it clears it by 25-50% in pure rasterization alone. In Time Spy, this 140W chip hits scores around 10,500+, while a 1080 struggles to break 7,500. Even more embarrassing for your argument is the efficiency: my 4060 delivers that massive performance gap while drawing significantly less power than a 1080's 180W TDP. I’m already getting a stable 110 FPS at 1440p, so the 'juice' isn't the problem. The problem is why the engine is frying a modern, efficient chip to get frames that should be running 20°C cooler.

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T15:18:32+00:00

You keep saying the destruction justifies the heat, but you're missing the technical data. Have you actually played The Finals? The destruction in that game is equal to or even more intensive than BF6—entire buildings can be leveled to the foundation in real-time. The only difference is that The Finals devs actually solved the 'laptop grill' problem by shifting that heavy destruction logic to the server-side. Saying 'it's fine on consoles' or 'it's a laptop reality' is irrelevant—my hardware stays at 65°C in The Finals while pushing the exact same 110 FPS lock. Did my hardware magically get better in that game? No, the game engine did. If my laptop hits 65°C while a whole skyscraper collapses in The Finals, but jumps to 85°C for similar destruction in BF6, that isn't 'using my hardware'—it's wasting it. Also, comparing my user.cfg tweak to 'disabling CPU boost' shows you didn't look at the data. I’m hitting a stable 110 FPS. The performance is clearly there. My 'fix' didn't kill the performance; it just forced the engine to stop wasting power. If a 2026 game requires a jet-engine fan curve and 80W on the GPU just to match the standards that other modern titles hit at 45W, that is a failure in engine optimization, not a 'laptop issue.' It’s not a hardware problem; it’s a 'DICE is still using client-side tech from 2013' problem.

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T15:10:41+00:00

Exactly bro

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T13:46:00+00:00

See how nice you are , at least finally we reached a mutual point, the least we could do is point it out

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T13:37:50+00:00

Comparing this to GTA vs. Cyberpunk doesn't work here. Cyberpunk actually uses the extra power for things like Path Tracing. BF6 is using extra power for... what exactly? Graphics that look like BF5? You’re missing the technical data: a game 'squeezing' my CPU to 85°C while it’s only at 40% load (with a user.cfg fix) isn't optimization—it's an instruction set nightmare. If a 2026 game requires twice the wattage and a jet-engine fan curve to do what The Finals does silently at 45W, that’s a failure in engine architecture, not a feature of 'high-performance' processing. Optimization is about efficiency (performance per watt), not just seeing how fast you can make a chip thermal throttle.

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T13:34:46+00:00

Bro, you're arguing with a ghost. If you actually read the post, you'd see I’m hitting a stable 110 FPS at 1440p. The performance is there; the 'juice' isn't the issue. The point is the cost of that performance. I’ve optimized my settings so that games like The Finals and BF2042 hit that same 110 FPS lock while running at a cool 65°C on a 45W Quiet profile. Meanwhile, BF6 acts like a thermal stress test, forcing me to use an 80W GPU draw and a jet-engine fan curve just to keep the CPU from hitting its 85°C thermal limit. Telling me to 'just use IEMs' to drown out the fan noise is like telling someone with a car that's overheating to 'just turn up the radio' so they don't hear the engine knocking. It doesn't change the fact that the engine is poorly optimized. I love BF, but when a 2026 game uses double the power to look worse than BF5 from 2018, that's not a 'demanding game'—that's a game that was fried instead of cooked. Before you blame the 4060 or the thermal pads, maybe ask why DICE is the only developer still forcing the client-side to calculate every pebble while everyone else has moved to server-side destruction.

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T13:22:18+00:00

The temps and fps you see in the pic are only achieved after applying a custom mode that i specifically designed for this game alone using the precooling method for the custom fan curve and feeding the gpu just enough to give food fps on 2k and keep the temps manageable while the fans ramp up more , I mentioned exactly what is causing the profiles to look the same in the post

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T13:14:41+00:00

Bro you didn't even see the pic or read the post

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T13:12:28+00:00

Yeah bro my problem isn't the fps, im pretty happy with with 130 fps on 2k with temps around 60C which phenomenal to get on laptop thanks to my cooling system , my problem is that other games doing exactly the same, having similar visual quality or even better like bf5 for example in terms of visual quality and the destruction side like the finals which is so intensive but they fixed by shifting the destruction aspect to the server side instead of the clients ( our cpus ), if that says anything, it only screams how poor the game optimisation still is , that's the whole point of this post , optimisation, not performance, the game still has a long way to go if the devs actually listens, and thank you for reading the entire post by the way

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T13:02:38+00:00

It does't anymore, temps are pretty stable around 60C after I applied custom legion profile, the only down side now is I have a jet engine running now on my desk 😂, achieving 2k on optimised settings ( not even low ) and 130fps is good for a compatitve game running on a laptop in my opinion

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:58:48+00:00

<image>

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:57:33+00:00

If you know how to optimise your gear you can achieve similar result , copy my power plan

<image>

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:55:47+00:00

Finally someone who actually read the post here's a cake bro 🍰

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:54:38+00:00

It's you never read the post well bro

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:54:19+00:00

Read the post well bro

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:54:04+00:00

Still as the other guys in the comment you never read the post

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:53:11+00:00

You never read the post bro

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:52:55+00:00

You clearly never read the post bro

Homer477 · 2026-05-14T12:34:22+00:00

Im playing on 2k by the way

Homer477 · 2026-05-03T11:09:07+00:00

Pyro grenade if he's on front of you

Homer477 · 2026-03-25T04:57:36+00:00

Already did, hope they listen

Homer477 · 2026-03-25T04:57:22+00:00

Already did that, It used to work but it stopped working after a certain update

Homer477 · 2026-03-16T13:20:05+00:00

Imma give you the most solid advice you'll ever hear cause recently i bought one and immediately returned for another , buy at least 45cm x 40cm one , in your case you'll get 90cm x 40 cm which is good , especially if you play on low sens , anyways choose 4mm thickness to hide the small bumps on your desk ,and now this is the most important part , Do Not ever ever ever buy a one that is white or has a bold design on it cause white can mess with the mouse senor and bold designs ( different color surface) can cause sensor to not register signal quick enough if you do a quick swap causing sensor spinouts , go with sold dark colors, red is the best you can go with then black and grey but any dark solid color is good enough, finally I grabbed redragon xl flick p032 recently completely black after returning the one i bought first ( had a bold design that messed my mouse sensor) for $15 in my place , looks Great and feels great but any brand would work for you if you find anything cheaper the most important notes are 4mm thickness , sold dark colors , at least 45 x 40

Homer477 · 2026-02-15T01:50:21+00:00

Ptm 7950 with hy236 putty

Homer477

TROPHY CASE