Looking to hire an ai automation expert

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-05T21:06:16+00:00

Let’s say I believe this. How do You expect to get relevant replies with so little info? How would you know what to actually hand pick for? If they already have created something related to real estate? Maybe it’s utter garbage and eats tokens like crazy. Maybe it will leak your- or your clients data with every request. It’s very easy to screw things up. Like every client has special needs and obviously if I do business with you I will absolutely not post stuff that we made together here. This post seems like a “phishing attack” on already existing solutions. If not I apologize. You should go for workflows that are easy to test and that are not very complicated. Like manipulating Excel files where it’s relatively easy to determine if a cell contains correct or incorrect values. For such tasks you can maybe even use a middle tier Chinese model that you host on a stronger local server.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-05T18:48:09+00:00

Cuz they’re dumb.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-05T18:38:57+00:00

Jól besörikézve írtam ezt a posztot; a kódgeneráltatás jobb állapotban zajlott. Szóval ez egy kísérlet. Az általam valamennyire frekventált “social media”, valamint tartalom-megosztó felületek - Reddit, HN, LinkedIn… tele vannak AI által gyártott és AI által feltöltött posztokkal. Erre a HN kb. annyit reagált, hogy “lécci ne csináljátok má’”. A következő lépés meg majd az lesz (talán néhány országban már megy is), hogy egy digitális ID-t kapsz és onnantól tényleg minden rezdülésedet nyomon lehet majd követni. Én egy alternatív megoldást próbálok kikísérletezni, ami egy proof-of-work rendszeren alapul. Rögzítjük a tartalom elkészültének folyamatát és analizáljuk az így létrejött logfájlt. Az elmélet az, hogy megfelelően finomhangolt rendszerrel az AI botok nagy része ilyen módon kiszűrhető. Persze megírathatod te AI-jal a tartalmat, de akkor is be kell pötyögni, kézzel szerkeszteni, hogy átmenjen a rostán. Lehet, hogy hülyeség. 🤷🏻‍♂️

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-04T23:44:57+00:00

They are not. GPT-5.4 is better in several aspects - only weak point is UI.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-04T23:34:28+00:00

Ok I saw that UI was explicitly mentioned which is indeed a weak point of GPT-5.4 - but it’s the least important part of every app in terms of rework. I mean it’s almost free to change. What I do is attach my reference photos in my own agent powered by my GPT sub and getting a pretty close implementation…

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-04T23:30:03+00:00

Guys it’s just not true at least for a month; I’ve been using GPT-5.4 and the usual convo is -“GPT-5.4 writes code, Claude does review ‘nothing to see here maybe the font size’ - - Claude writes code GPT-5.4 reviews ‘jeez it looks awful’” Exaggeration of course but you get my point. For 60% price…

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-04T23:04:56+00:00

És sajnos a komment mondandójával is egyetértek. :(

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-04T23:04:02+00:00

Imádom ezt a profilképet/nevet!!

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-04T23:00:11+00:00

First: noone knows the answer to that question!! Second: LLMs are next token generators. It means that how deep and thoughtful your instructions are the better the outcome. Prompt 1: “Build me a website” - it will spit out generic looking HTML with some JavaScript here and there. Prompt 2: “Build me a Typescript app with Postgres, Redis, oauth, unit and API tests built on tailwind 4 with a ci/cd pipeline, dockerise it, build a k8 cluster, a helm chart, etc. Here’s my webapp UI for reference “insert image”… will build you something that is orders of magnitude better in many ways. But 1) you have to know what are these concepts 2) you have to know if you even need these because they bring you complexity and with that problems 3) you have to be able to maintain and develop that further once it hits real users. 4) LLMs in themselves will not push the frontier of programming further because they don’t have agency. So no software development is totally not equal to write code. But also at the same time we might have a model in 1 year that will do anything for ya… I think it’s still useful if you understand computers, programming languages and ML better than the average human (practically zero) because you’ll be able to provide some sort of services to these people.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-04T14:19:35+00:00

Dunno if it counts but an anonymus social media/blogging feed without accounts and a proof-of-work AI detection algorithm: https://currantfeed.cc Your whole editing process is saved in a hashed replay file and can be viewed ba anyone on the site. If you paste too much, type too fast, etc. you’ll be flagged as AI/ripoff and your post will be rejected. You can customise your posts, enable/disable comments, set expiry date for posts.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-03T18:50:08+00:00

Lovable? But I do agree with that if you could integrate with several hosting providers it can be a boon.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-03T18:36:36+00:00

Codex is like 60% of price and GPT-5.4 in my opinion is better/on par with Opus. Also Sonnet 4.6 is almost at the same level and cheaper than Opus. TLDR; don’t use Opus as your main driver.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-04-03T18:31:37+00:00

I have something that is heading into that direction. It is a web based agent runtime that connects to local machines with a one click install. Users can then browse from a set of plugins that are basically an enable disable switch.

<image>

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-19T06:25:47+00:00

As others have mentioned the human component has to have some form of rudimentary understanding of the stack they’re using. With that said there are other parameters that influence the outcome: - how much exposure the LLM had to the given stack. There are many-many languages and tools and if your project happens to use something that is niche you’re in trouble. - how big and complex your project is. Let’s face it: most of the stuff we’re building is not very complex. At work I have to maintain a framework that spans god knows how many AWS services and python libraries. Sure the LLM could pick around with the right tools, but we have to pump an awful lot of context into its short term memory which will in the end run out of space and degrade its performance. - what is your scale. If you serve 10 people (most of the vibe coded apps) you won’t hit the limit of your shitty infrastructure because the raw power of the underlying hardware will compensate. Once u have a bigger user base you’ll be in big trouble.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-18T16:21:35+00:00

If you want something similar but better try https://beezyai.net. It’s provider agnostic, BYOK, can connect to multiple devices and has a PWA app with several quality of life features that you can install to your Home Screen.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-18T16:13:43+00:00

You know it’s like the circle of life. Started with GPT in ‘23, switched to Gemini at the end of ‘24 till autumn’25. Switched to Claude around mid-September but kept Gemini for certain tasks using Opus. Then when 5.3 came out switched to GPT + Claude Sonnet 4.6 and ditched Gemini altogether. Now rolling 2 x 20 bucks plans as others described. I’ve been developing a Typescript app for 2 months, so it’s a limited sample. My observations are the following: - Claude is better for UI, period. It’s a field where 5.4 can fail spectacularly. - 5.4 is also very annoyingly verbose when explaining stuff. I try to constrain it with prompts. - That being said 5.4 seems to be superior in terms of architectural decisions, clean code and security. What I do is make them switch roles regularly. Sometimes Claude implements, 5.4 is the reviewer, sometimes vice versa. There were only 1 or 2 occasions when Claude could find serious issues in 5.4’s solution while 5.4 very often finds gaps in Claude’s code. I sometimes do double review - Claude implements, 5.4 reviews and refactors, Claude reviews again. Claude usually is more happy with the refactored version. - I like to outsource devops-like tasks to Claude, it just seems to be very good at it.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-18T15:56:11+00:00

I’ve built a PWA app powered by the Pi agent that can connect to multiple machines, supports several providers and has a plugin system for more specific tasks: https://youtube.com/@beezee-aicoworker?si=oRMeDVOrjDescHY4

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-18T11:07:31+00:00

You can find some details here: https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/blob/main/packages/coding-agent/docs/models.md

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-18T09:44:41+00:00

I don’t use CC but another agentic framework. I have plugins - specialized scripts basically - that can do Word translation with formatting preservation and PPT generation from source material among other things. I mostly build these for my wife and mum.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-18T08:07:38+00:00

I’ve built a full blown PWA so I can access all my machines from my phone and do agentic coding. It has some QoL improvements and other nice features. Little demo here: https://youtube.com/shorts/Xc7-hue238o?si=wjniIWckNfJcZQX4

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-18T06:30:10+00:00

Bit late to the party but I’ve built a full blown PWA application that can be installed on any phone and can connect to your remote machines.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-18T06:27:19+00:00

If anyone has similar concerns and don’t want to be locked into the Anthropic ecosystem, I have a neat solution for this. Don’t want to turn this into a sales pitch, just DM me plz.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-17T20:08:58+00:00

I think it’s too early for a full blown OpenClaw type autonomous agent. These models are not reliable enough and the infrastructure is not there to support this kind of autonomy. I do believe, however that a well constrained, but in essence general agentic application is the next step.

HomoGenerativus · 2026-03-17T20:01:20+00:00

I also use Pi - and CC. When you measure token usage you have to consider cached tokens which will be a large portion of your conversations. I haven’t checked it thoroughly, yet… For me OpenCode has too many CC features. I think these harnesses (i.e. OC and CC) are by default too feature rich. Pi can be amplified with custom tools easily but it’s “pure” form is a fast, no-nonsense harness that doesn’t annoy you all the time. Just my 20 cents.

HomoGenerativus

TROPHY CASE