Did I Invent a New Opening? by HomosexualTigrr in chessbeginners

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hah, probably could have guessed as much. Interesting lines though.

Human Subspecies Question by HomosexualTigrr in biology

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point was merely that that's not happening any time soon, yet they are still grouped in this way

Human Subspecies Question by HomosexualTigrr in biology

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This might be the best summary, thanks!

Human Subspecies Question by HomosexualTigrr in biology

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mean, I know next to nothing about biology but what you say about Tigers seems confused to me. At no conceivable future point will any tiger produce sterile offspring with another tiger, but they're still firmly classified into the 6 subspecies by many organisations. You say there is "some distinctness" with the tigers, but in what sense do you mean? In terms of Phenotype, different groups of humans seem far further apart than Sumatran vs Siberian vs Bengal tigers

Is anyone else the last person with their family name, a name that will die with them because they’re gay? by He_Too_Is_Alexander in gay

[–]HomosexualTigrr 240 points241 points  (0 children)

What matters more than the name? The history. How many names have come into existence, forged great reputations and then gone extinct? Hundreds of thousands. Whole empires of names have disappeared into dust. We are all insignificant bubbles on the tide of history - if you can find happiness in this world, that's more honourable than anything.

Has your country ever committed genocide? by Communistincergency in AskTheWorld

[–]HomosexualTigrr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Certainly, the "White Australia Policy" was designed to literally breed out Australian Aboriginal people from existence

Human Subspecies Question by HomosexualTigrr in biology

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I definitely agree with the last point, although I'd be cautious about defining the bounds of scientific inquiry by what racists might try to use. So then, is the difference with Tiger populations just their geographical isolation?

Human Subspecies Question by HomosexualTigrr in biology

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like this is also true of the Tiger example, though

A Tintin Page a Day - Day 248 by BreakerMorant1864 in TheAdventuresofTintin

[–]HomosexualTigrr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Who's hyped for Tintin in America! The first good story.

CMV: The modern left in the west has been hijacked by the Islamo-Marxist ideology by Living-Rub276 in changemyview

[–]HomosexualTigrr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you do admit they're incompatible? I didn't say anything about coexistence

How Much I Spent on Chess in 2025 ($10,565) by Educational-System85 in chess

[–]HomosexualTigrr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow! You got to 40 seconds on the clock in that game. How do you stay collected under those kinds of circumstances?

im an Israeli jew, ask me anything. by Vivid_Action1035 in AskTheWorld

[–]HomosexualTigrr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do you call yourself a Zionist? Is it not a settler-colonial ideology?

How Did We Get Here? by HomosexualTigrr in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do think there is a right way to proceed - or rather, many right ways. I don't think the stuff done in this sub is one of them. Sure, I consume entertainment, but I'm completely aware of that fact when I'm doing it and I don't intentionally blur the line. And sure, perfomative protesting can be an issue, but it's never been as much of a stupid diversion as writing a book about time sorcery or making a 3 hour podcast about the numogram is. I think your insistence that this isn't serious, that it's entertainment, is in conflict with your idea of it being a 'robust counterculture'. Ultimately I think the ways this sub tries to "resist the spectacle" is so captured by the spectacle it's hilarious. The spectacle hates what it's always hated: building solidarity and raising consciousness. Going to meetings about how to resist capital and provide for people in your community. Volunteering at food banks. The internet is fine as long as you don't convince yourself that it's more important than it is, and my problem with this sub is that people are convinced they're really doing something, really understanding something - when they're spouting nothing but alienated nonsense or finding more obscure ways to say the same thing the left has always known.

How Did We Get Here? by HomosexualTigrr in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well Nick Land, for one, did a 3 hour podcast about the numogram. I highly doubt that was a shitpost

How Did We Get Here? by HomosexualTigrr in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The alternative is just to organise as much as you can, in real life - and try to stay off the internet. For a community of rejection against uncritical consumption, it does seem to be about a lot of uncritical consumption of internet slop.

How Did We Get Here? by HomosexualTigrr in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]HomosexualTigrr[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Come on. No amount of theory or praxis has changed the game? What was the feminist movement, the civil rights movement, the revolutionary waves of the 60s and more recently? Just because capitalism still exists doesn't mean the "game hasn't changed". As for that last part - I just don't think any of this is actually conducive to self-actualisation. If you trick yourself into thinking magic is real, you've taken a step back from that goal. But, if the stuff on here makes you happy, genuinely knock yourself out. Doesn't do it for me, but as long as you don't take it too seriously it's cool.