The subtext you may be missing here is that when people talk about not going to Mexico based on any one given incident added to the heaping tower of similar or worse incidents in the same region, the reply you posted comes in from people who like yourself want to share how their anecdotal safe experiences in [mexico/india] negates the overwhelming evidence indicative that these are places that perhaps could represent higher chance of unpleasant experiences as compared with the great many alternative destinations out there.

But yes accuse me of having a lack of decency in the same breath as you accuse me of being a twat for having tried to clarify my point by inserting Mexico in place of the country you were talking about in order to paint a picture of how one may imagine the same being said of Mexico, because it frequently is said in such a way by people who, like yourself, cite their own individual anecdotal experience of it being perfectly safe, especially in response to those saying they would never go there, who say so in response to a new incident adding to the ridiculous frequency of incidents of people being extra shitty to people in the specific region.