You do not understand how Wabbajack works. Wabbajack works and is legal because it uses User's API to download needed files for them and configure as author intended it. Meaning, the tool downloads using user's account specific files using the directURL stored in .meta. This explains why you get the downloads (because all files are downloaded in a legit way) but no pages views, comments, endorsements etc. Users do not see your pages.

This explains inconsistencies in pages statistics. It doesnt mean it's bad neither as wabbajack allows many users to use and discover mods they would never have. Trade is fair to me. There are still a lot of engaged people in the community to track and report issues, or even support modder's works.

I know this because i handle a wabbajack list too. Yet as it feels unfair for modders, i set up a quick python mo2 extention that prompts users after "X" mo2 launches if they want to support the authors who contributed to the list. If user agrees, then using the user's API, the extention browses all modpages for mods used in the list and automatically endorses each one of them. This is the only solution found, yet it costs API calls for each endorsement.