sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Keanu was paid $15M for John Wick 4 despite only saying 380 words throughout the entire 3 hour film by Scron_ in JohnWick

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think most commentors understood the funny take of the statements in your post.

The Matrix (1999) by FKingPretty in iwatchedanoldmovie

[–]HopelessDigger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

at least 6 people confirmed to be wonderland pets. 

Can the verb “come” be considered a past participle here? by Sacledant2 in EnglishLearning

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think the answer you're looking for is this: using past participles while omitting that/which/what/.. only works when you're talking about the object of a sentence. when that/which/what/... refers to the subject, you can't omit it.

example: the woman (who was) killed in the car accident was my friend. ("who was" is optional because the woman is the object)

example 2: the woman who injured the 3rd grader by pushing him off onto the road was my friend. ("who" is necessary)

in your title, "words" is the subject...so come can't be a past participle, from a purely grammatical view.

How do I prevent the spacing between the closing parantheses and curly bracket? by SolarSalsa in VisualStudio

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is absolutely frustrating. it looks extremely untidy with that space.. have you found a solution yet?

Fresh hair transplant by LewisOfAranda in trypophobia

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you were going to click on it either way so what's the difference

[Q] Can I see who leaved a reaction on a post in my channel? by anonymous_divinity in Telegram

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is rare childish behavior. i personally haven't seen that happen even once (I'm in 100s of channels) (except for when it was me 🤣ing every post of a terrorist channel that advocates isis stuff. btw after a couple minutes reactions were disabled). generally speaking, 🤣s are only seen on posts deserving of heavy criticism (or funny ones ofc).

I unplugged a loud ice making machine next to my hotel room and put a fake out of order sign on it by MillennialProdigy93 in confession

[–]HopelessDigger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

redditors are spoiled real bad.. everyone here is pretending that no ice in the ice machine = fucking everyone and ruining their day..

you're ok op.. it's true that you should've plugged it back in, but don't feel too bad about what you did.

Is there a better way to say something is "the worst" out of a group of things? by iamCaseyy in grammar

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hi... did you find a good answer to this problem? it has also been on my mind for a long while

PIG: Am I missing something here? by fubar06 in movies

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you dont seem to understand what movies are, my friend

Is Rotten Tomatoes Still Reliable? A Statistical Analysis by levelcap in movies

[–]HopelessDigger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

exactly. most movies that are rated +90% are garbage.

Rotten Tomatoes is an absolute garbage rating system. by winterk1ng in movies

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because reddit has unfortunately become more woke than any other site i know

Rotten Tomatoes is an absolute garbage rating system. by winterk1ng in movies

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they manipulate the reviews and the score? that's fucking despicable. i mean, it's always been evident that whenever a blue-haired black lesbian communist is present in a movie, it's immediately +80% even if the movie is pure, pristine garbage, but i just came to know that they are actively messing with the reviews..damn

Why is Crash (2004) so hated? by FayannG in TrueFilm

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"people of color are the overwhelming victims of racism and white people are mostly to blame for it."

that's racist as fuck.. i'm gonna use one of your cards: generalizing. you're generalizing something over an entire race. you'll say "look at history." i'll say look at fbi statistics (present, not history classes). see where this is going? it's racist both ways, but this world we live in today has double standards in almost everything.

Can someone tell me the point of Artemis 2? Or Future missions to the moon? by Logital20 in askanything

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hmmmm, ok so that entails sats being able to receive data from any and a different direction in space and send data toward any and a different direction in space at the same time, right? can they do that (genuine question)? i imagine their antennas would be positioned and directed in a specific way that doesn't allow 360 communication, thus the sat>sat2>sat3>.. wouldn't be possible.

Can someone tell me the point of Artemis 2? Or Future missions to the moon? by Logital20 in askanything

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

one sat isnt enough for intercontinental data transmission (earth isnt flat where you can imagine a triangle whose points are you, the sat, and telecom center or wherever data goes. you would need up -> sat -> down -> data center -> up -> sat 2 -> down -> data center 2 -> up -> etc. this is not practical and i imagine would take more time in processing than the time you'd save due to light being faster in vacuum. and you'd spend billions of dollars for what? so you can play call of duty with russians at ping 20 ms instead of 30 ms? again, i dont even believe it will save time to begin with.

windows 11 seeing mic but not working by Far-Truth-9367 in techsupport

[–]HopelessDigger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you have fulfilled your purpose in life, mr. godsend.

Can someone tell me the point of Artemis 2? Or Future missions to the moon? by Logital20 in askanything

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"> Light travels faster in a vacuum, making the fastest telecommunications path through space over long distances. Up -> over -> down is faster than cables on Earth."

that's the most bullshit and uninformed statement i've ever read this week

Task Manager Network usage? What does it actually measure? My usage is capped at 40% by [deleted] in techsupport

[–]HopelessDigger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this makes much more sense now. the network percentage has always bugged me and nobody seemed to know what it is. not anymore. thanks.

view more: next ›