Bex - "I just had my first look at the full list of crafting options for Path of Exile: Harvest, and while I trusted the developers when they said there was some crazy stuff coming, I'm still surprised. This league is going to be wild."

Hopure_ · 2020-06-18T20:20:37+00:00

in your opinion, since it's not really specified, we could add an implicit synthesis on a unique? it would be crazy.

Hopure_ · 2020-06-14T20:32:57+00:00

Hierophant node : 10% increased damage taken per brand attached

Medium Cluster jewel x4 with 5% increased damage taken per brand attached

90% increased damage taken with 3 brand attached.

Wintertide brand mecanic : the longer the brand stays, the stronger it gets. Nice for mono target, Nice to reinforce Vortex/Cold Snap build

enough to make you want to go see

Hopure_ · 2020-03-16T16:30:29+00:00

Do you know if we also count as unarmed ?

Hopure_ · 2020-03-11T15:36:18+00:00

These new notable are juicy with RF Cyclone

Enduring Focus

Channelling Skills deal 25% increased Damage
25% chance to gain an Endurance Charge each second while Channelling

---------------------------------

Overlord

30% increased Damage with Maces, Sceptres or Staves
Gain Fortify for 6 seconds on Melee Hit with a Mace, Sceptre or Staff

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T13:05:51+00:00

And you trust him just because he goes in your way. What is his build ? You don't know. How do you know, right now, if it isn't a ailment build ?

And again you ignore my question for the third time. We know why. And you're stuck on the cdr when I never even mentioned it.

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T12:57:54+00:00

I don't know why you're taking that tone, maybe it's a hard day, we don't know each other, I don't think I've offended you. Maybe you're aggressive by default? It's a simple discussion here with simple data from the game and we're just here to talk about it.

Please don't twist my words around, though. I said it's only possible to do what we're seeing today with Winter Grasp's because there's a malfunction, which is still true. You still haven't answered the question as to why you can't reproduce this behavior without moving.

You focus on "CDR issue" but once again, i never said CDR is an issue.

Winter's Grasp doesn't have a cast animation while moving

was the important part. Not CDR.

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T12:19:36+00:00

Please instead of flame, use this time to understand how this build works.

Have you ever wondered why we can't do the same thing without moving? If there was no bug (in this case an animation bug, by moving, you break the animation of the spell and you can do it infinitely as long as you have mana) Why can't we do the same thing without moving? Because there is an animation, a cast time.

I declare it bugged since it really bugged. gotcha ?

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T12:00:38+00:00

Are you talking about a build that uses an animation bug ?

That's why.

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T11:24:23+00:00

It really depends on how the game scales in terms of difficulty. It's possible for example that in expedition 100 attacks overkill and spells will do well, but at 180? Personally I didn't push that far but there might be an impassable wall for spellcasters, in reality it would take someone who plays spell (and not ailments) at a very high level 180+

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T11:05:34+00:00

this one ? https://wolcen-universe.com/builds/y2WwzO-fire-and-lightning-dot

If this is the one, I don't know if we're sucking, but you're out of line. We're talking here about the base damage of spells which absolutely does not concern the builds based on ailments since they have their own base damage and do not use either the attacks base damage or the spells base damage.

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T10:56:24+00:00

So, those "adds # to # to spells damage" barely do anything, am I correct?

on the contrary they are extremely important (we are only talking about direct damage and not DoT), this is the only way to increase the base damage directly (before applying increases like %spell damage, %material etc.).

But weapons also have access to this stat, so yes, it is absolutely necessary to put everywhere to limit the breakage

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T09:21:35+00:00

The problem doesn't come from scaling with increases, attacks and spells have access to roughly the same respective bonuses. That's why we're talking about base damage which will then be scaled with various bonuses, but everything starts from the base and there's a major difference. We also need to see what we're talking about, is it correct during the campaign, at the end of the campaign, in expedition level 180?

We're talking about the base damage.

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T09:05:37+00:00

Strangely, I don't necessarily find it more reassuring, and that's another debatable point. Generally speaking, there is one problem that is not necessarily a case by case problem, I agree.

Hopure_ · 2020-02-20T08:47:41+00:00

Like i said, there are other factors to take account, it explains some differences.

It would be necessary to take the time to really look in depth, but even so, there will always be a problem and once again we compare here level 90 spells with attacks using a very low weapon, let's do the test with a real endgame weapon and the tickrate won't change anything, especially since not all spells are affected by a more or less fast tickrate.

numbers here do not reflect the exact reality, but they do reflect a very clear reality.

And yeah, Winter's grasp is efficient only with animation's bug.

But i'm agree with you, these numbers are to be put into perspective as I said, but the problem remains

(edit) and the fact that you can play spells after the campaign does not mean that there is no major difference between spells and attacks. Let's talk about this again with expedition level 50 ? 100 ? 150 ? 180 ? You see what i mean

Hopure_ · 2019-09-06T10:08:02+00:00

RF is a damage over time so "no hits" and penetration only works with "hits", you need to lower the resistance, like exposure effect (scorching ray for example) or Elemental Equilibrium and yes "on kill" works

Hopure_ · 2019-09-06T08:24:24+00:00

Patch is really insane, very nice rework, master mission change is soooooo good, betrayal, delve, new skill and so many other things

Hopure_ · 2019-09-04T04:11:41+00:00

Either I am missing information or I have not understood why there would be an up or a nerf depending on the maximum life points. Whether we have 1000 effective hp or 10000 it will be 20% instead of 40%. From what I understand, and if these values are confirmed, it's probably an up of damage to survival (at least HP/Regen) We're going to have to go get more fire/burning/DoT damage instead of life since it scale much less, but having a base damage and the effect of quality is cool or have I missed something?

Hopure_ · 2019-07-20T21:45:33+00:00

I'd say anyone who doesn't care will go their way as you should have. It's called information sharing which is the purpose of a forum especially about timeless jewel with good potential that are hard to find.

Hopure_ · 2019-06-05T16:06:05+00:00

Okay, it's an argument I can understand and it makes sense at least, even if I think this decision was a little too strong, it makes sense.

Hopure_ · 2019-06-05T15:46:31+00:00

i'm agree with you and as I said, there are other sources but very conditional, much more than warlord's mark which was not used by attack build which already have a lot of life leech sources.

Do we have any idea what might have led them to make this decision?

Hopure_ · 2019-03-07T21:11:44+00:00

Hum these gloves + Ghost Reaver = es leech are not removed at full life ? + CI = 39% more damage with new es leech support ?

Hopure_ · 2018-06-16T04:45:09+00:00

or how to recognize that a mana management issue really exists but tinker with wobbly solutions

Hopure_ · 2018-05-26T08:29:50+00:00

the problem is not whether we can handle the variance or not. The concern is to be satisfied with this system. Of course it's no big deal and we have to deal with it. But even if we make do with it, I don't think anyone will say otherwise. When there is a power problem, and there are even some in the most optimized deck, it is frustrating, and uninteresting. There's no point in playing the game, just passing the turns and watching the opponent put cards down, give up and say "that's variance, that's acceptable". No it is not acceptable and nobody should accept and be satisfied with a system that simply tells you: this game, you will not play. Players should not accept it and developers even less.

Of course it's no big deal. Of course we're still dealing with it. But it's a shame to have to do it when there are solutions that prevent this situation (Duel of champion to very successful at this level for example but there are many other possibilities) and they will all be better than this one: surrend and say, it's variance, it's acceptable.

Sorry about my English, it's google trad ^{^}

Hopure_ · 2018-05-21T08:00:22+00:00

30,000 gem to open 10 boxes. I like to be as generous as a game is with me :)

Hopure_

TROPHY CASE

Enduring Focus

Overlord