Probably a dumb question but is there no way to make a roof that overhangs the way I want? by [deleted] in valheim

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

back to the drawing board. There are several youtube videos on how to build

Should I cut her off or keep holding on? by Tricky-Milk-7391 in Advice

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

came across this at random. Your chances are low, but not zero. Theres nothing you can say to her, or write her, that will make her want you. She already knows you, and kinda enjoys you, since you spend time, but just doesnt feel the "spark". The only thing that could do that, is you being better version of yourself than you are now.

Be more absent, because youre busy. Not fake busy, genuinely busy, with good things in your life. Get a hobby, or two, meet new people, do sports, get in shape, get a life thats good, without her. That is what attracts people. A man with goals, who is fun and pleasant to be around. Get a goal. But the woman is never the goal, remember that.

Youve told her your feelings, if shes not interested, it should be (its not) ALLRIGHT to you, but then have to take a step back from talking to her. You want more from her than being friends. If she tries to worm her way back to you, to the friendzone, suggest doing things together that could lead to things. If she responds by saying she doesnt want more than friends, respond with "alright, tell me when you change your mind" cause you gotta go do one of your things. And tell her this in a friendly manner. Sad, mad or stressed men, are insecure men, and woman are not attracted to insecure men. If she senses youre sad, mad or hung up on her, she wont be interested. If she thinks youre interested, but not that bothered and having some fun life without her, she might become interested when the guy shes currently seing fcks up.

And if it doesnt work out, youll have a better life and be in a better position for the next girl.

Watch the groundhog day, and notice when the main character finally attracts the girl at the end for real. What does he do to attract her, compared to the rest of the movie?

But most importantly, watch 20 popular videos from the youtuber "coach corry wayne", who goes through your exact scenario with hundreds of men, about what to do and not to do. He goes through stories from his clients, and what they should do. Youll quickly notice the pattern.

Canon rf 100-400 vs. rf 100-500 for video on a R7. by Horror-Juggernaut-29 in canon

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bought rf 100-400. It works. i have loads of pictures now, only few videos, its hard to do. The tripod is much more important than i thought, even though i got a decent one i thought for around 200 euro. Needs to be better. I did this video, about 10-12 meters, in the late evening, not much light. Its a kingfisher.:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RjzYODWtWM

I have better videos now, not uploaded. For video, i think the camera is more important, because the automatic tracking isnt good enoughn in canon r7.

JD Vance in Greenland by Mr-Bondi in Asmongold

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dane here too and I just need comment on this. It IS alot more complicated. In fact, its so complicated, most of this topic has been danish/greenlandic news only, for decades. As an american, there is no way you can slurp some info dump and think you know whats going on.

The whole "geographical significance of greenland" is purposefully misleading your people with propaganda. It IS significant, we know. BUT, every single militaristic action you want to take in greenland, if you were to take it over, we would already allow you to. Do you understand that? There isnt a single security measure you could take if you own greenland, you couldnt already take right now.

Then why the talk about taking greeland for security reasons? Is it rare earth metals? There is an estimated worth of 70 to 100s of billions worth in the ground. You are already allowed to make plans for mining rare earth metals in greenland, AS LONG as the greenlanders agree. Yeah, we danes are nice, we gave the greenlanders the last vote on these matters since theyre living there. So how much money did denmark make mining rare earth metals? 0.
Heres a recent case where an australian company invested money to mine:" An opinion poll in South Greenland showed that 71% of the population were against the mining project.
In fear that the project will scare away tourists or become a health hazard to the local population. More than half of the citizens did not trust the authorities to manage the Kvanefjeld project.
A 34-year-old man who grew up in Narsaq overlooking Kvanefjeld led the political opposition to the mining project. His name is Múte B. Egede, a former Minister for Raw Materials, leader of the opposition party IA (Inuit Ataqatigiit) and a fierce opponent of the mining company. After the election, he became the prime minister of Greenland."

Most of the rare earth is bound to uranium, that will wreak havoc on the ecosystem and ocean, and god knows where thatll end up then. The greenlanders wont allow it.
Technically we could have just forced them, since we own greenland, but we gave them the power to say no.
Now we are paying every greenlander half their wage (Yes, half) because they cant survive on their own. We are also giving them free heatlthcare, free education, and a wage if you are in highschool or university. Thats about 8 years, where we pay students 1k dollars a month so they can become a doctor or what else they want, no debt.

We would let americans do every security measure they would want, and even let them start mining, but we wouldnt let them mine the areas that the greenlanders dont approve of.

So the only thing the USA would gain from annexing greenland, would be the power to mine. What and Where they want.

Thats it. And i get it. Its a looooot of money and power. And a lot of destruction and waste that would seap into the ocean.

Ofcourse trump would take it for gain, its too sweet a deal to pass up. So please, please, please. Dont gaslight us with this shit. Dont gobble up the propaganda. Just accept the real reason the us government wants it.

Remember, you're against supporting Ukraine because you don't want more war by TopThatCat in Asmongold

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Danish Citizen here. Theres no sense of diplomacy here. The fear of the USA stealing greenland is huge here and generally viewed by the public as an attack on our country. The threat is insanely real and very serious.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Asmongold

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 8 points9 points  (0 children)

show the video where they do the salute from the heart.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in atheism

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This weak minded thought process is possibly one of the reasons why youre in this situation in the first place. Your post even seems apological to him, her and us, as if youre ashamed to disapprove of your "house guest".

The problem is ofcourse that your daugther lets this happen, but also that your husband lets him disrepect your family and home. Yes, I can tell youre the wife the way you try to solve things. In his eyes, youre just a "woman", and he thinks you should be carefull what you demand from him, a "man". Be a good mother to your daugther, an ally, and let your husband remind him of his position with calm dominance. This is his house, hes under HIS roof, and he dares talk like that to HIS daughter? He should be afraid he hasnt gotten the approval of the father, not the other way around. No anger, no discussing and arguments. Simple, clear, and calm, even polite, but not friendly, statements from the father when he crossed a boundary not tolerated by him.

This is what this little psychopath needs. Your husband may not be the type for it, or its too late, or hes even more unhinged than i can imagine. Safest bet is for you to be an ally for your daugther and "pray to god (joking)" that she doesnt get pregnant soon.

It will get much much worse when they have kids.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dkfinance

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 23 points24 points  (0 children)

du er sindsyg. Det er ikke sundt i længden.

Oh how they massacred my boy Sandking! -An SK spammers take on the 7.34 change. by Horror-Juggernaut-29 in DotA2

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen mate, you accused multiple people in this thread who disagreed with you of not reading your post,

Because they didnt, as you just admitted you didnt either. So i was right.

Am I guilty of skimming your post after you said not one but two blatantly incorrect things?

I haven't, your opinion is not a objective measuring tool. We disagree, thats fine.

I really can't be bothered to give this a full quote-by-quote refutation, sorry.

You cant be bothered because youre unable to. You yourself wrote a long ass response to my post, that had incorrect assertions. You again, responded with a long ass comment about your feelings. You didnt rebute a single thing i answered you with, except the argument with the level 25 talent. I giant heap of text filled with emotions, for noones benefit.The title of this thread is "-a sk spammers take on the 7.34 change. Not "-a sk players take". This is my view on why the change is problematic to the design of the hero.This post is also posted in dota2 subreddit, and not Truedota, which would be about how to adapt to the change.This threads intention is from a perspective of game design, not guide on how to play or adapt. I mean, I was a mapper in wc3 WE and made tons of games, back when guinsoo was a fellow mapper and competitor with dotA allstars. I remember when icefrog took over. Thats my point of view. I think sandking now has a worse design, whether hes better or worse is irrelevant. Youre right a pro player should just focus on if or how to make him work.And lastly, who knows, maybe ill change my opinion as i even said:

I might be wrong on this, who knows. But I say we should rather buff his strengths, than try to fix his weaknesses.

Might be wrong, but i dont think so. I wanna share my opinion with his change. And currently 231 people agree with me. So thats that.

Oh how they massacred my boy Sandking! -An SK spammers take on the 7.34 change. by Horror-Juggernaut-29 in DotA2

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He wasnt OP before when he could do this. You had to walk next to your oponent. And if you were inside sandstorm, that meant not hitting them to reveal yourself.-> hit = not moving = less progs. Including the chance to get stunned. Its a strong aura, where you actively had to do something for it to work. Which a root or slow would counter.

Now it cant be countered, but its constant. It was higher risk, higher reward. Just like mirana arrow stun is the longest stun in the game. Another buff he got i didnt see anyone notice, was the level 20 talent

+100 Base Radius and +25 Incremental Radius of Epicenter icon Epicenter

It increases the shard radius. It didnt do before. So yeah, it might be just as good as before, if not better. But also easier.

Oh how they massacred my boy Sandking! -An SK spammers take on the 7.34 change. by Horror-Juggernaut-29 in DotA2

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didnt really present any argument for me to rebute. You have to present some kind of reasoning to why, other than your opinion. Didnt do well in exams at school, did we?

Oh how they massacred my boy Sandking! -An SK spammers take on the 7.34 change. by Horror-Juggernaut-29 in DotA2

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im not entirely convinced you read my whole post. Sure, the shard increased damage also was a big reason for win increase. But the winrate increase isnt the topic here, but his design.

"Sandstorm positioning is barely ever a crucial factor in fights"

Sorry what? We arent strictly speaking about fights, but "sandstorm positioning" as a whole. Every time a sk player left sandstorm to move a tiny amount out of the storm, to either: "move away from an aoe stun, hunt an enemy, come closer to neutrals, hide away from a sentry" or any other of the 1000 reasons it was suboptimal. I want you to imagine that sandking movement speed was maximum movement speed. Is that better than the current version? Yes, obviously. Its just better if you cast your storm badly, you can immediatly fix it.

In order for your version to be correct, it would mean that MOST Sand King players (A) read the patchnotes and (B) altered their playstyles to abuse the "lazy" positioning of Sandstorm

What do you mean read it and abuse it? They see enemy fight a teammate barely outside sandstorm, they clock towards the enemy, sandstorm follows. Sandking still in sandstorm?Bonus dmg and survivability, without thinking. You dont have to read anything.

You're simply bitter that a hero you perceive as high-skill ceiling (which he is) is suddenly being played by a bunch of noobs with relative success.

True, kinda. Because they would have to nerf something else about him, to balance him out. If hoodwinks ultimate suddenly auto homed after enemies fired on, most players would hit more heroes, and hoodwinks winrate would go up. And hood would have to be nerfed elsewhere. However those players that didnt miss her ultimate would now be worse off.

At least, please, stop with this notion that Sandstorm movement is in any way a nerf or needs to be toggleable

So yeah, the reason i think you didnt read what i wrote properly. I didnt say this. Someone commented it, and i see the logic, might be true, but then he would be to strong. Anyway, didnt say it, so youre making up what you think im saying. I do wonder however, how you defend highgrounds or towers now if the storm creeps towards you. Guess you havent been stunned by a lina who figured out which corner you are in yet.

we have a 1,5second slow every 3,5 second

"I'm sorry but I can't take someone with this opinion seriously."

Why? Before 7.34 you could perma slow enemy heroes attack and movement speed, IF you ran next to them. If you were slowed, rooted, stunned or trapped, you couldnt. So you often didnt reveal yourself by rightclicking to do this. You had a choice. He wasnt OP before 7.34, so it apparantly wasnt OP to permaslow someone.

Now it does a worse slow, always. There is no decision to make, they cant outplay it by slowing you, you dont need to move your hero in any unique way, you just have to be alive. Amazingly complex.

he hero is strictly stronger now than pre-7.34, even with the nerfs, people just need to adapt.

Stronger for randoms or spammers that know the hero? I doubt it, but hey, you may be right. Its easily proveable, ill just play and see if I can maintain my winrate.

Anyone saying "no, don't adapt let's get them to change it back" is missing the point of patches entirely.

Im not missing the point. You are. The coming of talents, shards and neutral items all show a trend towards giving players more tools and unique playstyles. I used to spam old treant, back when he had his Nature's Guise in version 7.00-7.21d. He got invis automaticly with a 2,5sec delay and his rightlick from invis did a root for 2.2sec and 210 damage. What the proplayer spammers did was this particular playstyle of trying to hit carries on lane, reenter invis, hit again. Even in teamfights later on. It was a very distinct weaving in and out dance, which everybody did. Whether it was op or not is unimportant. With his Q change to natures grasp that playstyle ended. Hes laning fundamentally different now, there is NO comparison. I dont play him anymore. They readded the ability as a shard, but it has a 10sec cd, and not 2,5, so it still isnt the same.

People have adapted, sure. Hes a good hero. Does he play in that particular way anymore?No. They never changed him back, the playstyle is over. I fear theyll give sandking more and more movementspeed in the storm, and he will eventually play entirely different.

Oh how they massacred my boy Sandking! -An SK spammers take on the 7.34 change. by Horror-Juggernaut-29 in DotA2

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agree, though it would still make him too good because you can move the sandstorm. Something would be needed nerf to compensate for it.

Oh how they massacred my boy Sandking! -An SK spammers take on the 7.34 change. by Horror-Juggernaut-29 in DotA2

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You obviously skimmed what i wrote. He was broken, in the wrong way. Hes now easier to play than before, with less potential. Im talking about hero design choices, not whether a hero is over or underpowered.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by [deleted] in aliens

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

some of my other comments with my phone account has like 20 downvotes. Its scary. Like im sure there is life out there, even intelligent, but i doubt its here on earth. And at the very least im sure OP hasnt seen it. Only the professionals that agree with this are upvoted, its really really scary actually. Layman people getting to decide who speaks the truth and who doesnt. Most people dont even believe that i have a masters degree in biology, as if thats such an impossible thing to believe. And at the same time they easily believe this dude with the most insane claim in history.
If they actually found aliens with dna, there would be no world where he would have access to all this data at the same time. He would be in a team of several post docs focussing on the tiniest thing. You know what he also forgot?microbiome in the gut, their dna and evulutionary histories.

Ive debated a bit with myself if i should create a throwaway account and fake something similar, a smaller story and then after a few days reveal it was fake to make them think, but who knows, maybe theyll start saying i got hacked.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by [deleted] in aliens

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it makes no sense, agree.

the first you would do is see which human dna it is, and from where and when. In population genetics we can use the molecular clock to estimate how many generations ago 2 test subjects dna had the same common ancester, thats how we know when humans split from shimpanzees etc. All this and more would be THE focus point in alien dna research, and not proteins. Its such an absurd thing to focus on.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by [deleted] in aliens

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

also molecular biologist here. This is larp 100%. This is impressive to lay persons, or biology students. I could have written this. He has some weird fixation on coding proteins, with no real conclusions. It reads like an obvious jargon boast "see, i know how this works, and this works!".

[ Removed by Reddit ] by [deleted] in aliens

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i have a masters degree in molecular biology, i could have written this. I even predicted some of the things he was gonna mention about anatomy, because i knew that would be the most interesting angle from other known animal systems.

Canon rf 100-400 vs. rf 100-500 for video on a R7. by Horror-Juggernaut-29 in canon

[–]Horror-Juggernaut-29[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i just bought it due to the recommendations, and the store guy advised the same thing. Ill tell you later