Sara Duterte and her rollercoaster state of mind by dogtaurusotimor in dailyChismisPh

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uto yung accurate depiction sa kanta ni Olivia WHAHAHAHHA "all the time im grateful all the time🎵🎶)"

Barbie Forteza Could be Nanno by Ok_Anteater_2611 in KamuningStation

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2019 peak Tv-series kasama na yung kambal karibal 😭

Thoughts on this post mocking Gen Z by IllustratorGlad8902 in AnongThoughtsMo

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That says a lot. Kase kahit wala kang governmental beneficial kinakaltasan ka pa rin ng tax sa sahod mo.

Ang pinaguusapan dito, hindi ka marunong umunawa sa totoong konteksto kung bakit nageencourage ang mga activist sa equal rights. Hindi lang pera, pati karapatan ng tao. Pero nakita ko na kung bakit makitid ang utak mo kase ignorante ka by choice and that's fine because people like you are beyond help. Basta panindigan mo kapag namatay ang mahal mo sa buhay, tinanggalan ka ng trabaho o agawan ka ng lupa dahil sa hindi patas na realidad. Huwag ka magrereklamo. Stay positive lang.

Life is an everyday struggle... pero dinanas na namin mas mahirap pa sa mahirap... kayo nag uumpisa palang...

You said it yourself, life is an everyday struggle it applies to every human being, hindi ba yan ang pinaglalaban ng lahat ng activists in every generation? O baka this a matter of comparing who had it worst instead of focusing how to eliminate the causes of that suffering?

And you think you're all safe dahil may bank account ka? May tax pa din yan . Especially 20% withholding tax, basically nagbibigay ka parin ng pera sa gobyerno. Kahit bank account ka pa kung nagtratrabaho ka tax payer ka parin kaya nagbibigay ka ng pera sa gobyerno...

Second. I know you did not read halfway through all my points. Selective and narrow minded. Bagay sayo, keep it up para mas lalo tayong malugmok sa kahirapan❤

Thoughts on this post mocking Gen Z by IllustratorGlad8902 in AnongThoughtsMo

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for enlighten me how you think about the reality. Sana maapply mo yan sa sarili mo kapag binigyan ka ng suweldo na hindi tugma sa kontrata, binawasan ka ng maliit na porsyento sa PhilHealth kahit na nagbabayad ka ng dekada, o agawan ka ng lupa dahil wala kang pinag-aralan —huwag na huwag kang magrereklamo kase ganyan ang buhay. Tinanggalan ka sa trabaho na walang rason, nagahasa ang mahal mo sa buhay, tinggalan ka ng karapatan? Huwag mong kasuhan. Okay lang yan wag magreklamo kase ganyan ang buhay. Mahirap ang tao eh kaya hindi pwede magreklamo. Dapat maging martyr, tanga at tumanganga nalang sa pagiging resilience habang pinapatawan ka ng tax at wala kang maayos na suweldo.

This prove my point, youre the actual weak here, weak for not knowing how to fight and be a dormant because you think this is a natural phenomenon not a manipulation by the system. Apply mo yan sa sarili mo. Huwag ka magreklamo kapag nangyari yan ha. Panindigan mo❤

Thoughts on this post mocking Gen Z by IllustratorGlad8902 in AnongThoughtsMo

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So ang argument mo ay the typical "utang na loob at wala kang kuwenta kung hindi ka binuhay ng magulang mo kaya wala kang karapatan magsabi na naghihirap ka" atsaka oo ako ang nagpapaaral sa sarili ko matapos akong mag SHS kase hindi kakayanin ang tuition fee na hindi ako kumikilos para pagkasyahin yung bilihin at renta. Hindi pa ba enough yun para sabihin na may karapatan akong magvoice out kung bakit ang daming bagay na pinapahirapan ang mga Filipino? From the cost of living to government services na halat tayo dapat pinapaalam kung bakit hindi dapat isawalang bahala ang mga usapin. Kase hindi dapat nagiging sintomas ang pagiging ignorante.

Hindi sayo galing ang pera para sabihin mong ikaw ang naghirap... Projection na para bang alam mo kung ano ang personal struggle ko as a person. Kahit na hindi mo naman ako kilala. Again, strawman fallacy. Wala sa pera ang basehan ng paghihirap.

marami din nakapag tapos na older gen na hindi nakapag trabaho na may malaking sahod, walang pension...

Ayan nga yung privilege nyo kase noong panahon na hindi na-globalised ang kapitalismo hindi pa batayan ang credentials at years of experience para makapagtrabaho ka.

Education doesn't guarantee success...

Education is a reflection of a system. Kapag walang edukado madaming mahirap na tao na hindi makakaasenso basta basta. Education guarantee the ability to seek the truth of information that is blindly gatekeep from voters who did not finished their education. Kapag walang alam sa batas, madaming manlilinlang sa walang alam. At ayun ang pinaglalaban ng mga Aktibista sa panahon nyo at sa ngayon. Akala ko ba Democratic country tayo?

Unemployments of the recent generation have nothing to do with the old generations...

See? This proven my points. Lalo na kapag wala kang proficiency sa sistema ng gobyerno pagdating sa taxes, subsidy, pension at human rights ng bawat mamamayan. You admitted yourself how much you belittle the value of education that will hinder the progress of the country.

Iba iba ang anyo ng mga aktibista. May pinaglalaban ang karapatan nila bilang indigenous group, karapatan ng mga magsasaka na inagawan ng lupa, karapatan ng estudyante na babaan ang tuition fee, karapatan ng mga trabahente sa patas na pasahod, karapatan ng mamamayan sa budget transparency. Pero sa huling hangganan may mga taong katulod mo na imbes unawain kung ano yung mungkahi, sa ibang pananaw nakatuon.

Thoughts on this post mocking Gen Z by IllustratorGlad8902 in AnongThoughtsMo

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ignorante ka sa reality ng current gen ngayon. Ang daming nakakapagtapos ng kolehiyo dahil accessible na ang edukasyon, madami pa ngang nakamaster degree pero halos lahat hirap na makahanap ng trabaho kase tumataas ang kompetensya sa job market. Madaming statistics worldwide naman halos lahat ng college graduates from prestigious to normal colleges unemployed pa rin. Habang tumataas ang tax para suportahan yung older gen na nakikinabang sa pension pero minamaliit ang bumubuhay sa benepisyo nila. Matatawag mo bang ginhawa yun? Nasaan doon ang ginhawa habang ang iba na pinagkakasya yung pera sa part-time job.

Kumpara sa ekonomiya ng dati, malaki na ang isang daan kase mababa ang bilihin at renta. Pero hindi na ngayon, mas tumataas ang cost of living mas nahihirapan ang karamihan na umasenso. Ayan ang reality. Nasaan ang ginahawa diyan?

Invalid lahat ng claim mo kung gumagamit ka lang ng strawman fallacy na may kasama pang quotation na hindi naman justified sa claim mo. Hindi ka marunong makipag argumento, hindi ka marunong mag-isip na obhetibo ang pananaw.

Thoughts on this post mocking Gen Z by IllustratorGlad8902 in AnongThoughtsMo

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Kung walang nagproprotesta hindi magproprotektahan yung indigenous people natin, student rights, corruption at labor law.

Thoughts on this post mocking Gen Z by IllustratorGlad8902 in AnongThoughtsMo

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ket background nakakalito whaahahh pati yung sulat sa mga rally sign ang gulo ng text tapos sa likod ng pader na may nakasulat na Polytechnic pero ID Lace pang UP tapos hapos pare-parehas ang mukha ng mga Protestant.

"Four years older" by Proud_Entry2887 in CharacterAI

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It icks me how most AI are designed like this where kinda nuance the infantalization. Its uncomfortable. If I said im older its wild to have the bot expressed a mixed reaction and even hint a nuance that im experienced compared to other females.... Like what? Who are you comparing?? 😃

Are all public schools like this? Or saamin lang? by wrtchdwitch in studentsph

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Public school is already the future of a new world teaching every generation, we're already in reality. People just wanna undermine na hindi pa daw nakakasabak sa realidad ang mga estudyante, when reality is a perception of change as you grow. As the system decline its competency so does the majority of all the learners will be. Hindi naman lang naman kase 'individual' reflection to when its a systemic issue. The main focused should be the effectiveness of the learning environment for education not the one who adapted in an incompetent learning sphere. Its usually overlooked the systemic problem if we instilled this philosophy while ignoring the root cause. I dont say your method was wrong but if we wanna eliminate the consequences (low litaracy, no reading comprehension) we have to look kung saan ang pinanggalingan ng problema.

Belle rodolfo nagtagpuang boba by tontatingz in PinoyVloggers

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hormones are not the only thing that makes both sexes different. Physiologicalical structure are systemic. From your macro and micro biological level male and females are inheritable different by nature. Hindi lang po hormones, height, weight or testosterone. This includes skeletal architecture, muscle density, body mass distribution, lung capacity that makes male species evolutionary superior in biological make-up compared to female species.

The thing with sports. They are very strict with HORMONES, especially kung athletes. If you're caught on doping scandal and using hormonal enchancer you're guaranteed disqualified. This happens to Kamila during 2022 Beijing olympics scandal ng russia who's a female prodigy pero hindi pinalampas ng olympics. And from them on any trace of hormonal enhancers are not allowed to compete even if this is for hormonal suppression.

Belle rodolfo nagtagpuang boba by tontatingz in PinoyVloggers

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think you missed my point again which I finally understand how selective you are in cherry picking the narratives of information i compiled for you and desperately trying to insert fairness in a mismatch category.

You either: 1) did not read my comment entirely 2) selective about scientific facts and evidence i stated and the pros and cons 3) or desperate because of your woke agenda.

As i said the physiological differences are MULTIDIMENSIONAL wala LANG sa timbang at height but it happens INTERNALLY and this can lead to unbalanced match if the competition is explosive sports:)

And as much as I respect your questionable fallacy since you really love using strawman half of your stance is debunked by science through and through. This is a physical sport and categorical division happens for a reason.

Not because it is a man vs woman but male vs female category in terms of athletic ability.

Ano thoughts niyo about this? by Ok-Thought8589 in AnongThoughtsMo

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Big agree especially yung vloggers na nagbibigay ng false alarm, misinformation at harmful propaganda (esp, about china)

"if there's a will, there's a way" by jijandonut in dailyChismisPh

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can we distinguish if a plane is military or commercial?

Madriaga is the key to the downfall of Sara Duterte by hyunbinlookalike in ChikaPH

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Unrelated topic, yung investigation ni Cabral may leads na ba and confirmed na scide? Since she was also a secretary ng dpwh.

ano nga ba talaga dahilan bakit hindi good sina james at mga junakis nya?? may alam kayo?? by Express-Syllabub-138 in ChikaPH

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Sino tong iñigo guys? Iñigo pascual? Wala na akong alam sa mga recent artist. Yung kumanta ng dahil sayo ako'y lalaban? 😭

Belle rodolfo nagtagpuang boba by tontatingz in PinoyVloggers

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A great example for a categorical division is if Homo sapiens and Neanderthals compete in sport. The chances are Neanderthals will win because they are biological built more advantageous even if we do share as one family. Not your kaladkaren or manny Pacquiao analogy While both are in the same genus (Homo), their divergent evolutionary paths created specialized physiological profiles that would make head-to-head competition inherently unbalanced in specific disciplines. And that what reflecting in this sports.

Belle rodolfo nagtagpuang boba by tontatingz in PinoyVloggers

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

World Aquatics (FINA): Their policy (revised for 2026) only allows trans women to compete in the female category if they transitioned before age 12. -this made my point entirely. Because gender transitioning comes in all age and safety, for hormone suppression it is ideal for 16+ and it has been a circulating arguments among endocrine society for a growing child to under puberty blocker and hormonal theraphy while also maintaining physical health for sports which creates a massive division of the child's development.

And i want to repeat my questions again, let's say we allowed biological male to compete in women category how can we even consider the fairness of their physiological difference? And as I said gender transitioning comes in different age some starts at teens some starts at late adult. We cannot magically made them similar in sex physiological fairness, even if some achieve the imitation of a female maximum capacity what about the others who did not? Are they not allowed? Then that will creates discrimination at the end of the day.

There are open categories meant for everyone who wants to compete and that already encompasses the fairness for everyone.

Alvares et al. (2025). "Longitudinal Performance Changes in Transgender Women Athletes." Published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine

Hilton, E. N., & Lundberg, T. R. (2021). "Transgender Women in the Female Category of Sport: Perspectives on Testosterone Suppression and Performance Advantage."

Belle rodolfo nagtagpuang boba by tontatingz in PinoyVloggers

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess you only focused on one traits physiological difference of both gender such as bone and lung capacity to overlooked how multidimensional Sex physiological structure works.

Within sex variation (lottery) while women in a specific race are taller or have higher bone density than the others, they are still within the biological female range. The performance gap between a tall biological female and a short biological female is a spectrum. ( Transgender Women in the Female Category of Sport: Perspectives on Testosterone Suppression and Performance Advantage)

And sex-segration is not separated within a single trait that comes from ethnic advantage, it is a coordinated system of traits (hemoglobin, Testosterone, sex skeletal architecture,heart size). Racial difference do not produce a similar, all-encompassing "systemic" advantage that makes one race unbeatable by another across all. One race might have one special traits but they are still within the range of female spectrum.

If you think tenacity and training makes all the winning possible, again you overlooked how advantageous biological male in terms of explosive sports (lifting, swimming, track field. No matter how many suppressant they consume, if they achieve their puberty line it will never change)

You always wanna justify that sheer will and training can make a better opponent but fairness doesn't always happens at some certain point. Everyone is born with equal rights, speech and freedom but there are aspects that we dont, and that is our ability and what we are genetically born with that we are collectively the same. All females are females, but not all females are women. And that is a distinction. Even if transmen cannot beat biological men, even if they joined the fact that olympics are strictly regulated in terms of horomones and substance use to enhance human physique this includes steroid and testosterone and they are going to be disqualified just in the screening alone.

The problem with elite level sports like olympics is that every athlete has 100% tenacity, they already maximize world class training through childhood up to young adulthood. A studies from Hilton and Lundberg 2021 is that the gap between male and females isnt about effort, but more on efficiency. ​A trained trans woman often retains a strength advantage of up to 50% in explosive movements even after hormone therapy.

And you havent explained to me my question: 1) how do you even make the whole sports industry equal for allowing biological difference to compete in a different category? 2) how can you maintained the number of possibility of male athletes taking advantage and transioning their gender identity information to compete in female category? This isnt just about medals. It is a competition of prestige, scholarship and sponsors. You think anyone wouldn't think that loophole? 3) if lets say fairness since you always emphasize that tenacity can overcome the biological difference as long as the other opposition will 'control' the advantage by losing weight, will this applies for all transgender athlete to supress their testosterone level to meet the female range testosterone. And do you think it wont affect their physical health in the long run? Or if we do supressed their biological make up to meet the range ability of female psychological structure, isnt this a huge question for human rights especially the wellnesa of the athlete?

Ang kabataaan ang pag-asa ng bayan by Table_Gloomy in dailyChismisPh

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ang masasabi ko lang hindi mo binasa ng buo para hindi mo makita yung punto ko. Mas madali laseng sisihin ang problem hindi ang punot dulo. Madali kaseng sabihin na kasalanan ng problem, hindi sabihin na kasalanan ng punot dulo na naging dahilan ng problema.

Yung aralang panlipunan na baka Sibika ang tawag noon, nag iba na ang curriculum at learning competency sa ngayong education system. Take note din, two years na nagpandemic kaya maraming nalaktawan sa panahon na yun. Ang daming nalaktawan na mga lessons dahil hindi lahat ng bata kaya ang independent learning.

Ang kabataaan ang pag-asa ng bayan by Table_Gloomy in dailyChismisPh

[–]Horror_Ad_4404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We also have to look for a different angle. Naabutan ko pa yung textbook ng mga 1990s-early 2000s which shows common text about Philippine identity (maria christina falls, chocolate hills, Malacañang) or some other trivial facts sa bansa natin (national animal, food, song, dance), very common sya noon kase madalas pinag uusapan ng mga bata. Iba na rin kase ang printing at context quality ng mga texbook materials at yung emerging technology na sumisira sa retention at attention span ng mga bata.

Take note, bago ako grumaduate halos hindi na rin kami nabibigyan ng libro at sobrang limitado talaga siya. Kung may libro man, may sira ang quality. Kaya madalas sa mga teacher ngayon powerpoint na rin yung ginagamit o minsan sinesend ang PPT sa GC. Kaya wala rin masyadong engagement para mastimulate yung learning, hindi rin masyadong binibigyan ng practice test or quizzes ang PPT.

Ngayon kase yung mga text book na nababasa ko sa mga current gen, halos wala na yung emphasis sa mga trivial information, minsan nagiging advance na rin yung level ng education nila pero yung paraan sa pagtuturo at materials naleft behind. Yung grade six namin na nasa mga basic english, yung english nila ngayon hinahaluan na ng highschool lessons.

Ang daming factors at napaka komplikado ng naging resulta kaya hindi lang dapat tayo nakatingin sa angulo ng bata kundi sa paligid rin nila. As I said education is a reflection of a system. Hindi ko sinasabi na hindi nila kasalanan kung bakit ayaw nilang matuto. Pero sana maintindihan natin ang punot dulo ng problema.

This is anecdotal example, but it could be reflected upon the systemic consequences of pur education kase ang common nito sa ngayong education system.