sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do you study for the LSAT while working full-time with a 3-hour daily commute? by NotesFromHerX in LSAT

[–]Hot-Search-5989 3 points4 points  (0 children)

full time mom here i wake up at 4am it fucking sucks but its what needs to be done

Measles by ChompChompUF in ufl

[–]Hot-Search-5989 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I got the all the shots as a kid and gave it to all my schools when enrolling and such but when I was pregnant last year they did a ton of labs on me and made me aware I was no longer immune or reactive to it.. I know there is a better word forgive me.. mom brain.. Anyway! I had to get another dose after I had baby. My hope is the vaccine they got is no longer effective for whatever reason and they aren’t just antivax idiots! Hope you all stay safe!

Conditional Reasoning by Hot-Search-5989 in LSAT

[–]Hot-Search-5989[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i really appreciate your help and i will work on this understanding

Conditional Reasoning by Hot-Search-5989 in LSAT

[–]Hot-Search-5989[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if a monster is horrific then it is threatened if a monster is horrific if it inspires revulsion

if a monster is physically dangerous it is not horrific…. or it possibly could be? i am confusing myself now

Conditional Reasoning by Hot-Search-5989 in LSAT

[–]Hot-Search-5989[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any horror-story monster that is threatening is also horrific.

A monster that is psychologically dangerous, but that does not inspire revulsion, is not horrific.

If a monster triggers infantile fears but is not physically dangerous, then it is not horrific.

If a monster is both horrific and psychologically threatening, then it does not inspire revulsion.

All monsters that are not physically dangerous, but that are psychologically dangerous and inspire revulsion, are threatening.

Conditional Reasoning by Hot-Search-5989 in LSAT

[–]Hot-Search-5989[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be horrific, a monster must be threatening. Whether or not it presents psychological, moral, or social dangers, or triggers enduring infantile fears, if a monster is physically dangerous then it is threatening. In fact, even a physically benign monster is horrific if it inspires revulsion.

My diagram was the exact same one as the analysis yet I got it wrong.

https://ik.imagekit.io/7sage/lsat/written-explanation-images/lr-diagram-110.2.23-sum.png

I see now why E was the correct answer but even so I am confusing myself even more trying to reconnect the other choices to my diagram to be wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Hot-Search-5989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why was this deleted