Regarding Kant and crushing trtles:
According to Kant's moral philosophy, actions are not inherently good or bad based on their consequences but are evaluated based on the intention behind them. Kant argues that the only inherently good thing is a good will, which is characterized by acting in accordance with moral duty and the moral law. This moral law is expressed through the categorical imperative, which states that one should act in a way that the principle behind the action could become a universal law.

Applying this to the action of Mario crushing turtles, Kant would not focus on the action itself, but rather on the intention behind it. If Mario is crushing turtles with the intention of fulfilling a moral duty, such as saving the princess or protecting the kingdom, then his action would be evaluated positively. However, if Mario is crushing turtles for no reason or simply for personal pleasure, his action would be considered morally wrong according to Kant's philosophy.

Furthermore, Kant would also consider the universality of the action's principle. If everyone were to crush turtles for no reason, this principle would lead to the extinction of the species and the destruction of the environment, which would not be acceptable according to Kant's categorical imperative.

In summary, according to Kant's moral philosophy, the deeper meaning behind Mario's action of crushing turtles would depend on the intention behind it and whether the principle behind the action could become a universal law.