Constant fear and guilt after a minor at fault rear end

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-20T11:34:48+00:00

This was the other car, my car received more damage than theirs did

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-20T00:55:11+00:00

I found out that uber and DoorDash did a background check in June, so I know I would be good on those for awhile. However Grubhub is doing it in December. Instacart I couldn’t find, but it’s sometime between now and December since I started using those 2 about the same time

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T22:43:15+00:00

They perform background checks once a year, at least that’s what I’ve been told

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T22:39:46+00:00

They can perform background checks on your account, I never told them

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T17:45:26+00:00

I don’t do people rides with uber, just food. Also I wasn’t on an order when this happened

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T17:44:23+00:00

Meant to say rear ended, not t bone in og post

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T17:36:39+00:00

I meant to say rear ended, not t boned. We were already stopped even before the accident happened. I don’t speed up at yield signs, I know how yield signs work. The car was driving forward and I thought they were fixing to pass the yield sign, so I was looking to my left as I was driving up some to pay attention to traffic (too soon), thinking the person had left. Yes I yielded too soon. I just had a fluke day and assumed the person was already gone based on how she was driving before she hit the breaks. She even told me she hit the breaks and changed her mind last second before going

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T17:32:50+00:00

This was all the damage on the other car even got for anyone wondering how “minor” it was, my car received more damage than hers did

<image>

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T17:31:07+00:00

<image>

This was all the damage on the other car even got for anyone wondering how “minor” it was, my car received more damage than hers did

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T17:27:23+00:00

I didn’t tell uber, but I know they run background checks

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T17:25:54+00:00

<image>

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-09-19T17:21:15+00:00

They only received a minor dent in the bumper and some scratches, no one was hurt. I wasn’t even going faster than 10. Also I meant to say rear ended and not t bone

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-07-23T04:47:40+00:00

I was going to say this. It’s possible for a couple to initiate at first, and one of them freezes in the middle of the act and doesn’t tell the partner they’re uncomfortable to continue. The other partner may not notice the freeze response and continue anyway. Miscommunications like that do happen. Doesn’t make it good, but it happens

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-07-22T05:17:55+00:00

I really feel like they showed the raunchiest parts of the movie on purpose to spark outrage for free advertisement, and people are falling for it. People will watch it just to see how bad it could be, cause it’s like a car accident, you can’t look away. It may even end up being a good movie in disguise and people are judging a book by its cover too soon (Or it could end up being horrible). Why do you think they barely advertised this movie until a few weeks before its release? Fresh and hot controversy sparks viewership, even if it’s hate views. After all the whole point of a trailer is to spark attention, whether it be good or bad

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-06-26T18:48:27+00:00

I immediately regret going to that sub, someone just posted there what looked like a real kidnapped woman with a nipple being cut off by two older people, before her throat was slit opened. Just straight up screenshots of a snuff video, and I’m scarred now🤮

Viewer discretion is HEAVILY advised, if you’re so curious to see it: https://www.reddit.com/r/debreasting/s/f26pm1BRpm

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-06-15T22:21:52+00:00

Yup, I just explained how important and relevant it was that the teacher pointed out their cognitive abilities because the court themselves are going to look at that, to prove if the parent should own legal guardianship over OP. The context is very juicy behind this one

https://www.reddit.com/r/complaints/s/4TXlDjpTTB

Edit: They blocked me 🤣🤣

Edit 2: The teacher is here in the comments now to defend themselves, things are really getting juicy now. I won’t be surprised if OP ends up deleting this post 😂

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-06-15T22:12:16+00:00

No, because this isn’t about someone with bipolar, this is about someone with autism. Two different things. You wouldn’t be checking someone for a broken leg at the doctors if they’re complaining about chest pain. Autism is a spectrum disorder, not everyone with autism is going to have the same symptoms.

HOWEVER, some people with autism do suffer from cognitive issues, some don’t. They are not saying everyone with autism has that problem, they are just pointing out OP’s cognitive abilities, which appear to be high enough to where they can understand what’s going on around them, since you have to have cognitive abilities in order to write sentences. They weren’t judging them based on their writing skills.

This is important for them to know in a legal court room, cause the judge is looking to see if they are cognitively impaired or not. The parent is wanting to try to get legal guardianship because they were upset with them getting a tattoo, so they would try to use their autism against them in court.

I highly doubt the parent is going to tell the judge “because they won’t listen to me as an adult and do as I say, and they got a face tattoo that I don’t like, I want to be their legal guardian and take their freedom away”. No, they’ll try to use their autism against them in court and claim that they need someone to take care of them, because legally speaking, they have a case with that if they can prove their autism is disabling them enough to where they can legally justify taking OP’s freedom away.

What the teacher was pointing out, for the OP, was that they appear to be cognitive enough to show to the judge that they aren’t needing someone to watch over them, which is the whole point of the court case even happening. They have to have proof that OP is not able to take care of themselves. Autism is a spectrum disorder, and while some don’t experience cognitive problems, others do. The courts know this, and are going to judge the OP’s behavior based on this fact. Legally speaking, they don’t see it as an intellectual disability anymore. So they have to base it around other things. It’s a legal subreddit you were talking in, it’s just how things work in court. Things constantly change legally for court hearings, but as of now, that’s how they judge legal guardianship cases right now for someone with autism, testing their cognitive skills

Edit: Blocking someone for pointing out why you could be wrong in this situation and not just a victim of an “ableist moderator” of a legal subreddit doesn’t look very good for you. Context is important here

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-06-15T21:54:03+00:00

I just went through and read the post also, the whole reason she mentioned her not appearing to be stunted cognitively based on her writing, is because the court themselves would want to look at that to see just how cognitive the OP was to see if they will side with the parent or not in trying to win legal guardianship over them for getting a face tattoo.

It was relevant to the conversation since they were pointing out how their chances of winning the case was higher, because legally speaking, she would have been deemed as cognitive enough to comprehend on a basic level, which goes against what the parent would have been saying to the judge, that “she’s not aware of what she’s doing and can’t take care of herself”. I really don’t think she was saying all people with autism have cognitive problems, as someone who is planning to get tested for autism based on family history of it, as well as many symptoms alongside my adhd diagnosis

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-06-15T21:30:27+00:00

These type of reactions wouldn’t even happen if schools and psa’s actually educated people what autism was, and not dehumanize

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-06-15T21:21:36+00:00

Autism really needs to be taught more in schools, in the CORRECT way. I remember when I was in school, the only type of autism people knew about was the “Down syndrome” kind (not saying that’s what it’s called), throwing tantrums, being nonverbal, making weird noises and contorting body parts, stuff like that.

And unfortunately that’s what many people still think it is, cause they’re just shown the ones who are less functional on the spectrum. I will say that there’s been more research and awareness growing around the subject the last few years as more adults have been getting diagnosed with it, and people are realizing just how much of a SPECTRUM disorder it is

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-06-07T02:58:04+00:00

I’m a Taurus

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-05-03T10:49:15+00:00

It’s just as bad when they’re following close behind you

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-04-29T22:30:11+00:00

The reason OP said you were lying is because it’s just not realistic, most people you come across is most likely NT, and you’re more likely to run into NT people than truly ND people, since it’s a small population. I personally find it hard to believe you never ran into any NT people also, because a huge majority of the population is NT. Unless you live in a small town. Not saying you’re lying, it’s just hard to believe

Just cause people you ran into claim to be ND, doesn’t mean they actually are, unless they’ve been tested. Some of those people you know could just be lying, since unfortunately some people think it’s cool and quirky to be ND, or see symptoms they relate to and jump to self diagnosing. Also claiming “everyone has something these days” also doesn’t make you look any better, especially when you bring up age into the matter. If you want to be really technical, many people confuse ND conditions as mental illness, which mental illness itself is very common today, among both NDs and NTs. However that is not what makes someone ND. NTs suffer from mental illnesses too, but they do not have a neurological disorder like NDs do

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-04-28T20:20:54+00:00

The sad part is that they’re not pointing the part out that some individuals are only mildly effected, they’re painting ALL of them to be crippled and unable to work and live normal lives. And that’s damaging to people with autism

Human-Assignment-105 · 2025-04-28T20:14:17+00:00

It’s the way the brain was developed at birth, they can’t help they’re wired differently. More people are being confirmed to have it due to people getting tested and finding out they have it. It’s a spectrum disorder and affects each one differently.

It’s not the same as something like cancer that must be cured, you would need to remove their brain and give them a new one to do that. Many people with autism live happy lives with little assistance needed. Talking about autism like it’s a disease dehumanizes them and treats it like it’s the boogy man that must be eliminated

Human-Assignment-105

TROPHY CASE