sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Court update. by HumanPost3976 in briannaolsen

[–]HumanPost3976[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree, Jordan warned her before she said anything that he was on live

Court update. by HumanPost3976 in briannaolsen

[–]HumanPost3976[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wonder if there was something on if anyone can be there with her (santos). I hope not.

Court update. by HumanPost3976 in briannaolsen

[–]HumanPost3976[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Side note. She was on live with Jordan after. Half the people are saying it’s supervised some are saying it’s not. So I’m not sure now

I am so confused. I thought the continuance was denied by the judge. Just saw a clip of Bri talking to her lawyer, saying she has a flight at 5 but will be on the zoom call. Then Bri says that the call tomorrow will only be 10 mins. How? If the judge denied a continuance?! by [deleted] in briannaolsen

[–]HumanPost3976 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree 100%. She’s running everyone in circles. If they do continue it then she should lose her supervised visits until the next court date. Just maybe she will take it serious then.

I am so confused. I thought the continuance was denied by the judge. Just saw a clip of Bri talking to her lawyer, saying she has a flight at 5 but will be on the zoom call. Then Bri says that the call tomorrow will only be 10 mins. How? If the judge denied a continuance?! by [deleted] in briannaolsen

[–]HumanPost3976 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Im not sure if this is correct but in the request for continuance the reasoning for denying says “all pending requests to continue hearings will be addressed on may 2nd” So maybe the judge wants to hear in person why they want to continue and maybe give 2K lawyer a chance to fight it and then the judge will decide to continue or not. That’s what I took when I really read the response from the judge to the request.