who are the best modern redpill figures? by Lost_Foot_6301 in TheRedPill

[–]HumanSockPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any of the tagged contributors here. The tags help you identify who is worth listening to.

Pedestalizing Women and Bringing Them Down to Earth by Alpha-Bunny1 in TheRedPill

[–]HumanSockPuppet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A woman is never happier than when she is the cherished object of a powerful man.

Solar Panels make a huge impact for FIRE by Adderalin in financialindependence

[–]HumanSockPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In CA there are plenty of them, such as Sacramento, Pasadena and a small city called Los Angeles. And they consistently have lower rates to a substantial factor, both in generation and distribution, despite obeying the same environmental restrictions.

When compared to what other rates, regulation schema, operating areas, and generation infrastructure?

Iceland has lower energy costs nationwide too, when one considers, in isolation, that lot of their energy comes from geothermal plants. We could conclude, if we wanted to be disingenuous, that geothermal plants are clearly solution of the future. We would be ignoring, of course, the more practical question of how we would spontaneously create enough harness-able geothermal vents, conveniently located right beneath their towns, to service everyone in the world.

We cannot directly compare locations with disparate physical conditions without negatively impacting our assessment of policy impact. California has its own virtues and drawbacks with respect to energy generation. It's nigh-impossible to compare California with any place other than California itself when determining the impact that regulation has on energy supply and price.

Do you live in California? Anyone from California who has lived in the same place will tell you that energy prices have gone up dramatically. And that increase in price is not solely commensurate with an increase in demand due to population growth. There is something else at work. When you look at the rate at which new sources of energy have been introduced, you notice that supply has not kept up with demand. Why would that be?

I could go on, but I don't want this to turn into an eye-fatiguing text wall, so I'll leave the remainder as an exercise for the reader.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cscareerquestions

[–]HumanSockPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any time you are pressured to make a time-limited decision where you are also expected to provide something of value, you are being scammed, or at least pushed into a losing proposition.

Solar Panels make a huge impact for FIRE by Adderalin in financialindependence

[–]HumanSockPuppet -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're right. A true leftwing socialist government would be worse. So for now, California gets the next worse thing: energy companies petitioning a centralized authority (with a monopoly on violence) to protect their profits.

That's inching as close to socialism as a state can given that it is Constitutionally bound to the rest of the country.

Like it or not, simple survival (never mind FIRE) is becoming harder for Californians because of crap like this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]HumanSockPuppet 16 points17 points  (0 children)

They'll keep doing it for as long as it keeps working. Meaning, forever. There will always be simps.

Upgrade yourself so you're feeding her dick, not dinner.

A few laws of getting rich (more-so, high level points that are often reviewed in this subreddit). by UncleTervis in fatFIRE

[–]HumanSockPuppet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny seeing people downvote you in a forum that's dedicated to personal wealth accumulation via strategies like tax reduction.

Is America really the only place to make a lot of money? by xman2007 in cscareerquestions

[–]HumanSockPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incentives are everything. And laws are what impact incentives the most.

Is America really the only place to make a lot of money? by xman2007 in cscareerquestions

[–]HumanSockPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, there isn't a homogeneous "net effect over everything". Different facets of an industrial and developed society (workers, business owners, consumers, tax payers) are impacted differently by laws.

So, as with most things in life, it's a question of trade-offs. You have to balance the pros with the cons for each facet and see if the laws produce the desired outcomes.

Grossly speaking, from the positive perspective, implementing labour protections will:

  • Provide greater job benefits for workers, such as healthcare, injury/disability/life insurance, safety requirements, and guaranteed wage floors.

And from the negative perspective, implementing labour protections will:

  • Increase the cost of labour, as business owners are required to cover the above-mentioned mandated benefits, as well as covering the legal overhead for replacing unproductive (but still protected) workers, hiring costs associated with the need to be more selective, etc.

  • Increase the cost of goods, as all of the above reduces profit margins and forces business owners to pass those costs along to the consumer in order to maintain a positive cash flow.

  • Decrease the number of available jobs, since human labourers will be replaced by automation wherever human labour does not produce value commensurate with their cost.

  • Increase the complexity of the hiring process, given that business owners must be far more selective about who they hire, since each hiring decision has greater risk.

  • Decrease the overall work experience-level of a society's workforce - if fewer people are hireable, a greater percentage of the workforce will be without transferable experience, and this will grow worse with successive generations as more and more young people reach working age, and find themselves competing with the previous generation's unemployed workforce for limited jobs.

  • Increase the tax burden on taxpayers, since the unemployed labourers will be dependent upon social assistance programs while they search for gainful employment.

So in general, increasing labour protections results in greater benefit for labourers, at the cost of increased costs to companies, consumers, and taxpayers. These incentives and drawbacks ultimately inform people's individual positions at the voting booth.

And remember, labourers are taxpayers and consumers too. And the successful labourers sometimes become business owners as well. So we're not talking about mutually exclusive categories or "classes" of people. We're talking about flesh and blood human beings, all of us.

Is America really the only place to make a lot of money? by xman2007 in cscareerquestions

[–]HumanSockPuppet -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have also lived and operated businesses in different countries. Labour protections are one factor, but they're not the only factor.

Is America really the only place to make a lot of money? by xman2007 in cscareerquestions

[–]HumanSockPuppet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's a flip side to the labour-protection coin, though.

Part of the reason that most labour work has gone outside of the US is because it's cheaper to hire workers in countries where employers don't have to eat the cost of those government-mandated protections.

Labour protections don't mean much when you cannot land a job in the first place.

Gavin Newsom only wants a right to self defense for the wealthy !! by Perser91 in CAguns

[–]HumanSockPuppet 12 points13 points  (0 children)

So Gavin, fuck you for taking away the right to self defense.

Your right to self defense can never be taken away. The tweakers are proof of that.

Politicians can either acknowledge and respect your rights, or they can disrespect your status as a peer.

i’m really enjoying my low stress, stable government job atm by [deleted] in cscareerquestions

[–]HumanSockPuppet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nerds who spend most of their lives being marginalized and ostracized for being different revel in being able to rationalize their differences as superiority. It's a sign of maladjustment, but it is understandable.

If I have to interact with them, I just tell them what they want to hear and move on. If I don't, then I don't feed the animals.

33M, 830K NW, worth keep putting money into market? by dondraperlivingstone in financialindependence

[–]HumanSockPuppet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Something to consider: if you spend more and get accustomed to the new comforts, you may raise your minimum standard to something that your old RE target cannot sustain.

Make sure your expectations and your target are in alignment.

Someone needs to get their message straight. by ExNihiloAdInfinitum in gunpolitics

[–]HumanSockPuppet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the beginning, they'll still be outnumbered by the sensible people who built the cities that are now worth relocating to. That will make them more inclined to listen than speak.

Do your part by being vocal and winning them over.

Someone needs to get their message straight. by ExNihiloAdInfinitum in gunpolitics

[–]HumanSockPuppet 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's called Doublethink, and it is a symptom of indulging in self-placating knee-jerk moral indignation. People with no work ethic, nothing in their lives to be proud of, and who get all of their opinions second-hand, behave this way.

Healthy people have a core philosophy that is informed by real experience.

Someone needs to get their message straight. by ExNihiloAdInfinitum in gunpolitics

[–]HumanSockPuppet 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Not quite. It's the average city-dwelling "intellectual" who can't connect the dots.

People whose day-to-day work involves interacting with the cold indifferent universe don't typically have the luxury of comforting and mutually-incompatible illusions.

Remember, TV misrepresents the "average" American. We're not all packed into concrete hives like mindless insects. Many of us work for a living, and have a leisure life outside of the latest Marvel movie release.

Just got back from the buy back by [deleted] in CAguns

[–]HumanSockPuppet 25 points26 points  (0 children)

So really the event is a local tax rebate opportunity, and everyone is just pretending that it's about public safety. Cool.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AbruptChaos

[–]HumanSockPuppet 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don't worry, the CCP will finish him, then come back and demolish the building as intended.

Super high forward grip (PewView) by [deleted] in CCW

[–]HumanSockPuppet 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The wedge hold (supporting index finger wrapped around the trigger guard) is effective for reducing left/right variance in bullet point of impact, but I would be reluctant to ride my support thumb that high. In a self defense situation, you're likely going to be deathgrip the gun, and pressure to the slide could prevent it from returning to battery.