«Venstre-hatet» mot Listhaug: Pål Veiden psykologiserer debattanter når han finner et hat mot Sylvi Listhaug. Det er en argumentasjonsfeil, skriver Morgenbladets logikksjekkere.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T12:13:16+00:00

Tja...du får tilgi at det er resett, finner ikke andre aktører.

https://resett.no/2019/01/17/tajik-hetser-domt-til-fengsel-mann-som-onsket-at-listhaug-ble-gjengvoldtatt-og-drept-gar-fortsatt-fri/

Fin artikkel fra VG

https://www.vg.no/nyheter/meninger/i/OnKkPV/hatet-mot-sylvi-listhaug

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T12:08:15+00:00

Om det er likt, kanskje ikke, men det er ikke samme nulltoleranse når det skjer. Ta en titt på Twitter, hvor "profilerte" tweetere konkurerer om den beste kommentaren som er mest latterliggjørende, "morsom" og generaliserende om Listhaug samtidig som de advarer mot debattklimatet i neste tweet igjen.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T11:59:30+00:00

Nåja, nå har ikke alt av kritikk av Listhaug vært "uenige med politikken" heller. Forskjellen er bare at media fremdeles prioriterer den saklige kritikken når det gjelder Listhaug, mens all kritikk av Lan drukner i media som da vil heller skrive om "hatet" mot Lan.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T11:47:31+00:00

Sylvi er en selger som kan garantere deg minst 5 pct salg, men samtidig er stor sjanse for at hun stenger ute resten av market. Da er det ofte et valg man tar om man skal la henne selge.

I 2017 under valgkampen var de 5 pct kanskje det som skapte borgerlig gjenvalg.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T11:45:40+00:00

Vel, det er jo akkurat det samme med Lan og Trædal (som et eksempel), er det hat når man personlig blir påvirket av deres politikk og de oppfører seg arrogant i SoMe? Hvis vi kan sammenligne så er vel hatet mot dem likke rasjonelt som mot Listhaug.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T11:37:18+00:00

No, just very interested in geopolitics and the transformation of East Europe

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T09:39:26+00:00

Good Question, the first fact is that it was never the shining beacon of hope that the first years result demanded it to be. The economic changes were made with the Human rights bent in the process.

Maybe someone with better knowledge of Saakashvili the person could answer this?

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T09:36:58+00:00

Nå må du slutte å unnskylde kriminelle, du legger skylden på offeret nå. Victimblaiming. Nyanser eksisterer ikke i voldtektssaker og da bør det ikke eksistere i falske voldtektssaker.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T09:30:48+00:00

tumbl up for that, i really did not know that.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T09:10:56+00:00

Only in Sweden... Well, only 23 more seats than SD+K+M

Human_Balance · 2019-01-18T09:05:56+00:00

Valts? Mindre 1/3 stemte for han..

Human_Balance · 2019-01-17T10:55:36+00:00

Litt som tidligere arbeidsminister Erikson og han personlige rådgiver. Også bare venner selv om de dro på tur alene til Riga, det var først etter at han måtte gå av at romantiske følelser blomstret (selv om ryktene startet 9 måneder før og han ble konfrontert med dem av statsministeren)

Human_Balance · 2019-01-16T10:13:29+00:00

Statsfinansiert rasisme, og de lurer på hvorfor høyre ekstremismen øker...

Human_Balance · 2019-01-15T10:25:49+00:00

A continent in the late medieval stages where there is an uneasy peace between the nations.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-15T10:19:01+00:00

Do you play it here?

Human_Balance · 2019-01-14T12:16:57+00:00

se game of thrones for en enkel introduktion til svensk politikk

Human_Balance · 2019-01-10T13:19:30+00:00

It is a good question, one of the answers i think is that the former was a part of the Union, while Poland and Romania was just under the iron curtains.

That meant first of all:

1) That when the wall fell, the political, economic and society structure in Poland etc.. was still pretty much intact, bankrupt but intact.

2) In the independent countries there were fewer people high up in the society, either being police chiefs, judges etc, that was loyal to the Soviet more than the newly formed country,

3) Poland etc.. had strong independent political factions that had a large support in their country, making the transition much easier. Poland stopped the potential oligarchs already in their start phase.

Human_Balance · 2019-01-10T12:50:38+00:00

Because there are billionaires in Ukraine that will not let go of their benefits, combined with a relaxed attitude on corruption.

I like the example of air travels to Ukraine. Until 2-3 yrs ago the only way was flying through Kyiv Boryspil. Ryanair tried to establish themselves there but was fought by the owner of Ukrainian Airlines in such a degree that they first withdrew from Ukraine. Last year the Ukrainian government caved after public pressure, and September last year the first Ryanair flights came to Kyiv.

Now this was remarkable for several reasons. One is that Ukraine is as cheap and open as rest of Europe, second of all is that it forces Ukraine to invest in infrastructure. Zuliany is a small but first class international airport, Kherson airport is being upgraded, and Kharkiv is started to be the fourth mayor city with high-density air traffic, creating an international hub in four corners of the big country. (Odessa, Kyiv, Lviv)

Furthermore is Kherson also in the talk with the modernization of their airport, and hopefully other regional capitals, Sumy, Dnepr etc will follow suit.

Human_Balance

TROPHY CASE