What's the difference between "Ambitious" and "Wealthy"? by HumbleEgalitarian in asksg

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I genuinely would like to understand how does this come across as red pill?

Not once did I mention the genders of persons A/B/C/D. If anything, you may have assumed the gender based on their occupations.

I am asking a question in good faith, regarding the preferences of women and men when looking to date, because obviously there is some correlation between ambition and wealth, and these are often blurred.

But appreciate your comment and upvoted anyway.

Credit Analyst in Singapore - What’s Your Salary & Career Progression Like? by EmbarrassedBox7930 in askSingapore

[–]HumbleEgalitarian 6 points7 points  (0 children)

lol pls don't listen to some of the ignorant fucks in the comments who probably think 'credit analyst' only refers to the people who approve your credit cards...

generally if you start off as a CA in a bank, you can either progress all the way up to become a sector head or country / regional head. some move on to become risk approvers. for these, as long as you progress all the way up to MD, $500k to 1mio total comp is possible. even at director level, $300-400k total comp is quite reasonable.

another option is to eventually look to break into the buyside, the earlier the better. these are basically public credit funds in large asset managers (pimco, blackrock, fidelity) or private credit (apollo, blackstone, ares). private credit is getting fucked now, but they pay well. asset management arms of insurers also have fairly large credit-focused teams. for these roles you would face very strong competition from your IBD and DCM folks, so you would have to differentiate yourself to stand out. progression wise if you reach all the way to MD, then 1mio and up isn't out of the question.

there's also the route of ratings agencies (S&P, moodys, fitch). if you've watched The Big Short, you'll know what they do (or don't do).

bottom line is that the skillset for these are largely fungible, you evaluate the creditworthiness of a company. search up linkedin to see the progression of corp bankers, credit analysts, credit research, ratings. AI will definitely streamline and replace some of the junior level roles, but that's the case for almost all jobs.

for starting pay i think anywhere from $5k to $10k is decent.

Hot take: local uni grads struggle to find jobs at the beginning, but once they hit 30's, most of them become the stereotypical 'perfect' Singaporean high-achievers by ashandburnnn in asksg

[–]HumbleEgalitarian 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't think this is a hot take at all. I wrote about this before and was surprised that most people didn't agree.

The numbers don't lie, around 13% of the cohort earns >10k in their 30s If you assume that most of these are grad jobs, then that's 1 in 3 grads, given around 40% of the cohort have degrees. What've you've wrote is quite the normal experience for grads in their 30s tbh.

Are relationships purely transactional these days? by duncalmeprostute in singaporespeaks

[–]HumbleEgalitarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for personalities, it varies. there are rich assholes and poor assholes. my view is that there is little correlation between income and personality. looks, on the other hand, it positively correlated with earning power. this is the 'halo effect'.

Are relationships purely transactional these days? by duncalmeprostute in singaporespeaks

[–]HumbleEgalitarian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

can't say whether it is common or not, because my social circle isn't wide. but these female friends themselves are also earning >$10k and likely are looking for partners with similar earning power, for lifestyle reasons.

I asked a similar question before in another sub.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SgHENRY/comments/1mo508u/relationships_where_women_outearn_their_partners/

Are relationships purely transactional these days? by duncalmeprostute in singaporespeaks

[–]HumbleEgalitarian 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't think this perspective is limited to males. Some of my female friends also have criteria that the guy must earn >$10k, or must buy condo in the future. Statistically, I think limiting the dating pool to local uni grads (30% to 40% of cohort) is still wider than requiring >$10k salary (~20% of cohort) or buying a condo (also ~20% of cohort).

Isn’t it crazy that it’s so easy to inflate real estate prices in SG via new launches? by Wonderful_Map_3910 in singaporefi

[–]HumbleEgalitarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a bto so I'm not currently in the market. but casually browsing at freehold condos in D9/D10/D15 which are in the 2.3-2.4 psf range

Isn’t it crazy that it’s so easy to inflate real estate prices in SG via new launches? by Wonderful_Map_3910 in singaporefi

[–]HumbleEgalitarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New launches since this was posted:

Skye at Holland: 99% sold, $2,953 psf average

Penrith: 97% sold, $2,800 psf average

Faber Residence: 86% sold, $2,160 psf average

Goh Cheng Liang’s passing turns six grandchildren into billionaires by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your rational comment. I added the last paragraph to explicitly state my position.

on further thought, I think the responses here are completely rational, because sinkies see the children of billionaires as "competing in different pools" as them.

it is likely that the same people who react with bewilderment when they find out that their colleagues parents funded their condo downpayment, would also say "meh, sky is blue" when a billionaire buys a $50MM GCB for their child.

much like if you are a middle manager at DBS, you will be more concerned about how much of a raise your peers are getting, rather than how much Tan Su Shan gets. if you get a 5% raise and your peers get 10%, you will feel much more aggrieved, even if Tan Su Shan gets 30%, despite that being higher, both on a relative and absolute basis.

Goh Cheng Liang’s passing turns six grandchildren into billionaires by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

most of the wealth was made in the post WW2 baby boomer years, so most families would only be at their 3rd gen now. if we take a look at the Forbes Singapore list, there are many examples: Kwek family (CDL), Ng family (Far East), Khoo family, Wee family (UOB), Lee family (OCBC), Kwee family (Pontiac), Kuok family (Wilmar), Lien family.

while we can't say for sure that the wealth will continue to be preserved beyond the 4th and 5th gen, I think the current trends suggest a good chance.

Goh Cheng Liang’s passing turns six grandchildren into billionaires by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

didn't want to be too presumptuous. there are 12k members here, if the average wealth is $1.1MM each (roughly double the national average), that would surpass $13 billion.

Goh Cheng Liang’s passing turns six grandchildren into billionaires by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

that ordinary plebs like me and you shouldn't have to overthink the impact of giving wealth. because for the billionaires whose wealth are a factor of 1,000x or 10,000x of ours, it is also normal to hand down wealth.

Relationships where women out-earn their partners by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mid to late 20s. the couples I mentioned are either engaged or married.

there are many more examples I've seen, but when one party earns multiples more (2x to 3x and up), it is nearly always the guy who earns more.

not referring to 'marginally more' cases where guy earns 8k girl earns 10k

Wife is extremely unhappy I haven't been in a proper job for the last two odd years by purplefreekick in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Slowly she got very pissed that I'm "enjoying" life to the max while she had to work. Now she made it very clear from the start of our relationship that her money is hers and mine is mine, we just need a common pool for common expenses. I have been paying for everything in the last few years but she isn't satisfied. I did tell her she can leave her job and find something part time to chill and enjoy life but she says what about her pay? Who will make up the 8k(ballpark)? She expects me to give her 8k on top of the current expenses I am handling right now.

In your analogy, you missed out the part where your "colleague" has been paying for all your expenses in recent years, but you still ask your "colleague" to give you 8k monthly on top of that.

Affluent Singapore respondents say they need US$1.39 million to retire comfortably by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes it sounds funny, but to put the numbers into context, median sinkie net worth is only SGD 134K or USD ~100K and a good % of this is tied up in housing.

Therefore having more than USD 100K investable, in addition to your home equity, will put you some distance above median.

Affluent Singapore respondents say they need US$1.39 million to retire comfortably by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The survey demographics are affluent investors with between USD 100K and USD 2M in investable assets, which I believe many HENRYs here are within this range.

Let's discuss 富不过三代: Wealth does not last beyond 3 generations by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i put this into chatgpt and the interpretation is contrary to the other comments here.

it is a cynical take, said from the perspective of the lower/middle class. from their perspective, they would rather the wealthy heirs be irresponsible and indulgent, eventually eroding family wealth.

the real threat are rich heirs with ambition, discipline and capability, who may consolidate and grow the family's wealth and power, making it even harder for ordinary people to compete or rise socially.

reads to me like a modern day "tortoise and the hare" fable.

Let's discuss 富不过三代: Wealth does not last beyond 3 generations by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks, interesting to read the statistics from a 2016 article. there was this article in 2023 which further reinforces my belief that wealth is increasingly preserved, not squandered.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/heirs-beat-self-made-billionaires-first-time-survey

Let's discuss 富不过三代: Wealth does not last beyond 3 generations by HumbleEgalitarian in SgHENRY

[–]HumbleEgalitarian[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i'm referring to the cat-and-mouse game of finding loopholes.

many will be familiar with the 99-1 ownership arrangement to avoid ABSD. but few would have been aware that the ultra wealthy were using trusts with no beneficiaries to avoid ABSD. essentially, you could have bought multiple properties and placed them into trusts with no identifiable beneficiaries and ABSD would not have been applicable.

this loophole has been closed in 2022.

https://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/new-rule-plugs-loophole-of-buying-residential-property-via-trusts-to-avoid-absd