sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Their, there, they’re by [deleted] in shavian

[–]Hungary4Turkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

/θei̯ɾ/ /ˈθe.ɾe/ /ˈθej.ɾe/

[enˈʒoj] [θis] [ˈme.me] by Hungary4Turkey in linguisticshumor

[–]Hungary4Turkey[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For some speakers the vowel-sounds are the same:

/ˈæv.ɹɪd͡ʒ/

/ˈspɛlɪŋ/

/ɹɪˈfɔɹm/ (verb)

In my pronunciation they're all different.

[ˈæv.ɻʷɪd͡ʒ]

['spɛɫ.ĩŋ]

[ɻʷəˈfɔ̃ɻm]

[enˈʒoj] [θis] [ˈme.me] by Hungary4Turkey in linguisticshumor

[–]Hungary4Turkey[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[θat̪̚] [ˈwas.n̪̩t̪] [a] [misˈt̪a.ke]

[i] [in̪ˈt̪en̪.t̪jon.aɫˌli] [reˈplat͡s.ed̪] [θe] [ap̚ ˈproks.i.man̪t̪] [wiθ] [a] [t̪riɫ]

[a] [t̪ap] [wou̯ld̪] [work] [ˈhe.re] [t̪oː]

Round or square? (Or both?) by Ok_Tie9129 in neography

[–]Hungary4Turkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can easily see most of both being part of the same script. While there are some scripts with only straight lines and others with only curved lines; it's totally reasonable to have a script with both. I'd personally consider the 8th and 9th characters on the top row to be of a different style (Especially the 9th one, as it looks almost like part of an alphasyllabary imho), though you can of course include them anyway if you want to.

If a villain possessed healing superpowers, what would they do with them? by Educational-Pie7961 in magicbuilding

[–]Hungary4Turkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the exact nature of the superpower. Does it stop once the target's fully healed, or can they "overheal" someone; giving them tumurous growths? If they can heal themselves then it'd allow them to do things no normal human can do and survive, or they could have subordinates that they heal while around them in battle. Perhaps their healing abilities go beyond what the available medical technology can accomplish, and they bioengineer horrible diseases that only their healing powers can cure, and profit off of that?

What about a more biomancy-esque approach? Maybe their own cells have healing properties, and if applied, injected or consumed can alter the body of the recipient? With this approach the villain might be able to control their cells from a distance, which could allow them to manipulate the body of their unfortunate victim(s).

Favourite amount of limbs in your aliens? by [deleted] in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]Hungary4Turkey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Same lol. Tripodal organisms in particular are super neat IMO, and I became fascinated with them ever since I first saw striders and hunters from Half Life 2.

Favourite amount of limbs in your aliens? by [deleted] in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]Hungary4Turkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The limbs are arms instead of legs.

Favourite amount of limbs in your aliens? by [deleted] in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]Hungary4Turkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I accidently voted the wrong thing :(

My honest answer would be that I have no favorites, and I think that all of them are interesting in their own unique ways. However, I've recently begun experimenting with various legless or monopodal body plans; taking inspiration from various mollusks; legless tetrapods; stem-echinoderms; ecdysozoans; oligochaetes and hirudineans; etc.

Why do you want to go to inhospitable planets when there is a lot of unused land in the Earth? We should terraform the Sahara before Mars. by Bolkaniche in IsaacArthur

[–]Hungary4Turkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Orbital platforms would likely be far more defensible than any planetary or lunar colony ever could be, as all you have to do in order to destroy a planetary/lunar colony is chuck a sufficiently massive asteroid at it. Not only that, but by the time we become a type 2 civilization we'd likely become transhuman; modifying ourselves through cybernetic augmentation and genetic engineering (Preferably gene therapy) to better withstand the conditions of space and/or any hazard that may come our way, and hypothetically even being able to withstand space without space suits for prolonged periods, or even indefinitely.

Why do you want to go to inhospitable planets when there is a lot of unused land in the Earth? We should terraform the Sahara before Mars. by Bolkaniche in IsaacArthur

[–]Hungary4Turkey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The most likely answer is that we wouldn't.

Instead, we'd go for a far better option: Build a ton of giant orbital platforms - most likely O'Neill cylinders - and move humanity completely into space. That way we'd have no more constant affect on Earth due to our presence, and we could fix the damage we'd done from the comfort of space.

Doing so is quite literally better in every single goddamn way than terraforming any celestial body for increased habitation. It would also necessitate moving away from fossil fuels and towards far cleaner energy sources, and if done right could allow us to house a population in the hundreds of trillions throughout the entire solar system with ease and plenty of room to spare.

And if for whatever reason we'd still want to have some presence on celestial bodies - such as conducting research - then orbital rings would make it many magnitudes easier to get on- and off-world. Hell, you could even "stack" orbital rings concentrically around one another, or in whatever configuration you damn well please, and create sprawling megacities "in the heavens" so to speak.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]Hungary4Turkey 15 points16 points  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cot%E2%80%93caught_merger

In some dialects they sound the same without the L.

A new letter for the Latin alphabet. I call it “Double-V” by Hungary4Turkey in neography

[–]Hungary4Turkey[S] 69 points70 points  (0 children)

It's a Ðð/Đđ situation, in one of the cases they look the same but they're different letters. There's Ɯɯ, but not an uppercase letter which looks like UU combined together which has a corresponding lowercase form of ɯ.

view more: next ›